Loading…
A CBO Study: Alternatives for Boost-Phase Missile Defense
This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study - prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Senate Armed Services Committee - looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept (BPI) system to defend the United States...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Request full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Arthur, David Roy, Robie S Hall, Raymond |
| description | This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study - prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Senate Armed Services Committee - looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept (BPI) system to defend the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The study compares the strengths, weaknesses, and costs of five alternative designs for a BPI system - three surface-based and two space-based - that span a range of performance characteristics. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations. |
| format | report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA426836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA426836</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4268363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLB0VHB28lcILilNqbRScMwpSS3KSyzJLEstVkjLL1Jwys8vLtENyEgsTlXwzSwuzsxJVXBJTUvNK07lYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiZGZhbGZsYEpAHRxiqM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>A CBO Study: Alternatives for Boost-Phase Missile Defense</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Arthur, David ; Roy, Robie S ; Hall, Raymond</creator><creatorcontrib>Arthur, David ; Roy, Robie S ; Hall, Raymond ; CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><description>This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study - prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Senate Armed Services Committee - looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept (BPI) system to defend the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The study compares the strengths, weaknesses, and costs of five alternative designs for a BPI system - three surface-based and two space-based - that span a range of performance characteristics. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ALTERNATIVES ; Antimissile Defense Systems ; BALLISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPT SYSTEMS ; BATTLE MANAGEMENT ; BOOST PHASE ; BPI(BOOST PHASE INTERCEPT) ; COST ESTIMATES ; DETECTORS ; Economics and Cost Analysis ; GROUND BASED ; Guided Missile Traj, Accuracy and Ballistics ; GUIDED MISSILE TRAJECTORIES ; Guided Missiles ; INTERCEPTORS ; INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES ; IRAN ; KILL VEHICLES ; LAYERED DEFENSE ; LIQUID FUELS ; NORTH KOREA ; OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS ; RADAR ; SEA BASED ; SOLID FUELS ; SPACE BASED ; THREATS ; VULNERABILITY</subject><creationdate>2004</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA426836$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arthur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Robie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><title>A CBO Study: Alternatives for Boost-Phase Missile Defense</title><description>This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study - prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Senate Armed Services Committee - looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept (BPI) system to defend the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The study compares the strengths, weaknesses, and costs of five alternative designs for a BPI system - three surface-based and two space-based - that span a range of performance characteristics. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations.</description><subject>ALTERNATIVES</subject><subject>Antimissile Defense Systems</subject><subject>BALLISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPT SYSTEMS</subject><subject>BATTLE MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>BOOST PHASE</subject><subject>BPI(BOOST PHASE INTERCEPT)</subject><subject>COST ESTIMATES</subject><subject>DETECTORS</subject><subject>Economics and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>GROUND BASED</subject><subject>Guided Missile Traj, Accuracy and Ballistics</subject><subject>GUIDED MISSILE TRAJECTORIES</subject><subject>Guided Missiles</subject><subject>INTERCEPTORS</subject><subject>INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES</subject><subject>IRAN</subject><subject>KILL VEHICLES</subject><subject>LAYERED DEFENSE</subject><subject>LIQUID FUELS</subject><subject>NORTH KOREA</subject><subject>OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS</subject><subject>RADAR</subject><subject>SEA BASED</subject><subject>SOLID FUELS</subject><subject>SPACE BASED</subject><subject>THREATS</subject><subject>VULNERABILITY</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLB0VHB28lcILilNqbRScMwpSS3KSyzJLEstVkjLL1Jwys8vLtENyEgsTlXwzSwuzsxJVXBJTUvNK07lYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiZGZhbGZsYEpAHRxiqM</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Arthur, David</creator><creator>Roy, Robie S</creator><creator>Hall, Raymond</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>A CBO Study: Alternatives for Boost-Phase Missile Defense</title><author>Arthur, David ; Roy, Robie S ; Hall, Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4268363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>ALTERNATIVES</topic><topic>Antimissile Defense Systems</topic><topic>BALLISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPT SYSTEMS</topic><topic>BATTLE MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>BOOST PHASE</topic><topic>BPI(BOOST PHASE INTERCEPT)</topic><topic>COST ESTIMATES</topic><topic>DETECTORS</topic><topic>Economics and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>GROUND BASED</topic><topic>Guided Missile Traj, Accuracy and Ballistics</topic><topic>GUIDED MISSILE TRAJECTORIES</topic><topic>Guided Missiles</topic><topic>INTERCEPTORS</topic><topic>INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES</topic><topic>IRAN</topic><topic>KILL VEHICLES</topic><topic>LAYERED DEFENSE</topic><topic>LIQUID FUELS</topic><topic>NORTH KOREA</topic><topic>OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS</topic><topic>RADAR</topic><topic>SEA BASED</topic><topic>SOLID FUELS</topic><topic>SPACE BASED</topic><topic>THREATS</topic><topic>VULNERABILITY</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arthur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Robie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arthur, David</au><au>Roy, Robie S</au><au>Hall, Raymond</au><aucorp>CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>A CBO Study: Alternatives for Boost-Phase Missile Defense</btitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><abstract>This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study - prepared at the request of the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities of the Senate Armed Services Committee - looks at technical, operational, and cost issues related to using a boost-phase intercept (BPI) system to defend the United States against intercontinental ballistic missiles. The study compares the strengths, weaknesses, and costs of five alternative designs for a BPI system - three surface-based and two space-based - that span a range of performance characteristics. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA426836 |
| source | DTIC Technical Reports |
| subjects | ALTERNATIVES Antimissile Defense Systems BALLISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPT SYSTEMS BATTLE MANAGEMENT BOOST PHASE BPI(BOOST PHASE INTERCEPT) COST ESTIMATES DETECTORS Economics and Cost Analysis GROUND BASED Guided Missile Traj, Accuracy and Ballistics GUIDED MISSILE TRAJECTORIES Guided Missiles INTERCEPTORS INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILES IRAN KILL VEHICLES LAYERED DEFENSE LIQUID FUELS NORTH KOREA OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS RADAR SEA BASED SOLID FUELS SPACE BASED THREATS VULNERABILITY |
| title | A CBO Study: Alternatives for Boost-Phase Missile Defense |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T23%3A19%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=A%20CBO%20Study:%20Alternatives%20for%20Boost-Phase%20Missile%20Defense&rft.au=Arthur,%20David&rft.aucorp=CONGRESSIONAL%20BUDGET%20OFFICE%20(U%20S%20CONGRESS)%20WASHINGTON%20DC&rft.date=2004-07&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA426836%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4268363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |