Loading…
Building-Level Functionality Assessment
ASTM International defines building performance as the in-service functioning of a building for a specified use (ASTM E1480-92). The term refers to how effectively, safely, and efficiently a building performs its mission at any time during its life cycle. A building's performance state, which c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Marrano, Lance R Grussing, Michael N |
description | ASTM International defines building performance as the in-service functioning of a building for a specified use (ASTM E1480-92). The term refers to how effectively, safely, and efficiently a building performs its mission at any time during its life cycle. A building's performance state, which changes during time in service, is reflected by two different indicators: the physical condition state and the functionality state. The physical condition state relates to a facility's general physical fitness, independent of its mission, as it deteriorates due to routine aging, excessive or abusive use, or poor maintenance. The functionality state relates to the facility's suitability to function as intended and required for the mission. The functionality state is distinct from, and determined independently from, the physical condition state. Condition-based metrics such as the Condition Index (CI) have been used by the Army for decades, but a companion index of functionality was not developed at the same time. However, to fully describe a building's fitness for changing missions over its entire life cycle, a quantitative and objective Functionality Index (FI) is needed.
The original document contains color images. |
format | report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA443905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA443905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4439053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFB3Ks3MScnMS9f1SS1LzVFwK81LLsnMz0vMySypVHAsLk4tLs5NzSvhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiYmxpYGpsYEpAErSSVe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Building-Level Functionality Assessment</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Marrano, Lance R ; Grussing, Michael N</creator><creatorcontrib>Marrano, Lance R ; Grussing, Michael N ; ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER VICKSBURG MS</creatorcontrib><description>ASTM International defines building performance as the in-service functioning of a building for a specified use (ASTM E1480-92). The term refers to how effectively, safely, and efficiently a building performs its mission at any time during its life cycle. A building's performance state, which changes during time in service, is reflected by two different indicators: the physical condition state and the functionality state. The physical condition state relates to a facility's general physical fitness, independent of its mission, as it deteriorates due to routine aging, excessive or abusive use, or poor maintenance. The functionality state relates to the facility's suitability to function as intended and required for the mission. The functionality state is distinct from, and determined independently from, the physical condition state. Condition-based metrics such as the Condition Index (CI) have been used by the Army for decades, but a companion index of functionality was not developed at the same time. However, to fully describe a building's fitness for changing missions over its entire life cycle, a quantitative and objective Functionality Index (FI) is needed.
The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Administration and Management ; AGING(MATERIALS) ; BUILDINGS ; FACILITY MANAGEMENT ; FACILITY PERFORMANCE ; FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS ; FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT ; FUNCTIONALITY INDEXES ; INDEXES ; INDICATORS ; INFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATION ; LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT ; Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies ; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS ; MILITARY FACILITIES ; MISSION-FOCUSED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT ; MONITORING ; OBSOLESCENCE ; PERFORMANCE(ENGINEERING) ; PHYSICAL CONDITION ; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ; RATINGS ; STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ; Structural Engineering and Building Technology ; STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ; USER NEEDS</subject><creationdate>2006</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27546,27547</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA443905$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marrano, Lance R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grussing, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER VICKSBURG MS</creatorcontrib><title>Building-Level Functionality Assessment</title><description>ASTM International defines building performance as the in-service functioning of a building for a specified use (ASTM E1480-92). The term refers to how effectively, safely, and efficiently a building performs its mission at any time during its life cycle. A building's performance state, which changes during time in service, is reflected by two different indicators: the physical condition state and the functionality state. The physical condition state relates to a facility's general physical fitness, independent of its mission, as it deteriorates due to routine aging, excessive or abusive use, or poor maintenance. The functionality state relates to the facility's suitability to function as intended and required for the mission. The functionality state is distinct from, and determined independently from, the physical condition state. Condition-based metrics such as the Condition Index (CI) have been used by the Army for decades, but a companion index of functionality was not developed at the same time. However, to fully describe a building's fitness for changing missions over its entire life cycle, a quantitative and objective Functionality Index (FI) is needed.
The original document contains color images.</description><subject>Administration and Management</subject><subject>AGING(MATERIALS)</subject><subject>BUILDINGS</subject><subject>FACILITY MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>FACILITY PERFORMANCE</subject><subject>FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS</subject><subject>FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>FUNCTIONALITY INDEXES</subject><subject>INDEXES</subject><subject>INDICATORS</subject><subject>INFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATION</subject><subject>LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS</subject><subject>MILITARY FACILITIES</subject><subject>MISSION-FOCUSED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT</subject><subject>MONITORING</subject><subject>OBSOLESCENCE</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE(ENGINEERING)</subject><subject>PHYSICAL CONDITION</subject><subject>QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS</subject><subject>RATINGS</subject><subject>STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING</subject><subject>Structural Engineering and Building Technology</subject><subject>STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY</subject><subject>USER NEEDS</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFB3Ks3MScnMS9f1SS1LzVFwK81LLsnMz0vMySypVHAsLk4tLs5NzSvhYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiYmxpYGpsYEpAErSSVe</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Marrano, Lance R</creator><creator>Grussing, Michael N</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Building-Level Functionality Assessment</title><author>Marrano, Lance R ; Grussing, Michael N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4439053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Administration and Management</topic><topic>AGING(MATERIALS)</topic><topic>BUILDINGS</topic><topic>FACILITY MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>FACILITY PERFORMANCE</topic><topic>FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS</topic><topic>FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>FUNCTIONALITY INDEXES</topic><topic>INDEXES</topic><topic>INDICATORS</topic><topic>INFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATION</topic><topic>LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS</topic><topic>MILITARY FACILITIES</topic><topic>MISSION-FOCUSED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT</topic><topic>MONITORING</topic><topic>OBSOLESCENCE</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE(ENGINEERING)</topic><topic>PHYSICAL CONDITION</topic><topic>QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS</topic><topic>RATINGS</topic><topic>STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING</topic><topic>Structural Engineering and Building Technology</topic><topic>STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY</topic><topic>USER NEEDS</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marrano, Lance R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grussing, Michael N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER VICKSBURG MS</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marrano, Lance R</au><au>Grussing, Michael N</au><aucorp>ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER VICKSBURG MS</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Building-Level Functionality Assessment</btitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><abstract>ASTM International defines building performance as the in-service functioning of a building for a specified use (ASTM E1480-92). The term refers to how effectively, safely, and efficiently a building performs its mission at any time during its life cycle. A building's performance state, which changes during time in service, is reflected by two different indicators: the physical condition state and the functionality state. The physical condition state relates to a facility's general physical fitness, independent of its mission, as it deteriorates due to routine aging, excessive or abusive use, or poor maintenance. The functionality state relates to the facility's suitability to function as intended and required for the mission. The functionality state is distinct from, and determined independently from, the physical condition state. Condition-based metrics such as the Condition Index (CI) have been used by the Army for decades, but a companion index of functionality was not developed at the same time. However, to fully describe a building's fitness for changing missions over its entire life cycle, a quantitative and objective Functionality Index (FI) is needed.
The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA443905 |
source | DTIC Technical Reports |
subjects | Administration and Management AGING(MATERIALS) BUILDINGS FACILITY MANAGEMENT FACILITY PERFORMANCE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS FUNCTIONALITY ASSESSMENT FUNCTIONALITY INDEXES INDEXES INDICATORS INFRASTRUCTURE DETERIORATION LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS MILITARY FACILITIES MISSION-FOCUSED INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT MONITORING OBSOLESCENCE PERFORMANCE(ENGINEERING) PHYSICAL CONDITION QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS RATINGS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Structural Engineering and Building Technology STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY USER NEEDS |
title | Building-Level Functionality Assessment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A22%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Building-Level%20Functionality%20Assessment&rft.au=Marrano,%20Lance%20R&rft.aucorp=ENGINEER%20RESEARCH%20AND%20DEVELOPMENT%20CENTER%20VICKSBURG%20MS&rft.date=2006-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA443905%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4439053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |