Loading…

Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities

A Presidential directive issued on January 14, 2004 -- called the new Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) -- set out goals for future exploration of the solar system using manned spacecraft. Those goals included returning to the moon no later than 2020. Although sufficient capabilities exist to meet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rehmus, Paul B, Hall, Raymond
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Rehmus, Paul B
Hall, Raymond
description A Presidential directive issued on January 14, 2004 -- called the new Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) -- set out goals for future exploration of the solar system using manned spacecraft. Those goals included returning to the moon no later than 2020. Although sufficient capabilities exist to meet the projected needs of both the U.S. commercial sector and the government for launching unmanned payloads into space through 2020, that is not the case for manned space flight. The proposed return to the moon called for under the VSE and now planned by NASA could require the development of the capacity to launch payloads weighing more than 100 metric tons. No launch vehicles currently exist that can handle payloads weighing more than about 25 metric tons. Thus, NASA's plans for manned space flight beyond low earth orbit (LEO) could require a significant increase in launch capability. How that capability could be provided and at what cost are the focal points of this study. In considering manned lunar missions, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) explored alternatives that would use existing launch vehicles; those that would require minor modifications to the designs of existing launchers (termed close derivatives); as well as those that would call for major modifications to existing vehicle designs to develop essentially new and much more capable launchers. This analysis presents six alternative programs for developing launchers and estimates their costs under the assumption that manned lunar missions will commence in either 2018 or 2020. Topics discussed include Current Launch Capabilities and Projected Worldwide Demand through 2020; Launch Requirements for the VSE; Alternatives for Future NASA Manned Space-Exploration Capabilities; On-Orbit Assembly, Launch Vehicle Reliability, and Overall Probability of Mission Success; Human Safety on Launch Abort; Schematic Depictions of Launch Vehicle Derivatives; and Cost Estimates for Alternative Launch Systems. The original document contains color images.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA456721</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA456721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4567213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDBzzClJLcpLLMksSy1WSMsvUnArLSktSlUI1QvWUwguSExO1fVJLM1LzlBwTixITMrMySzJTC3mYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiamZuZGhsYEpAGE-Snh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Rehmus, Paul B ; Hall, Raymond</creator><creatorcontrib>Rehmus, Paul B ; Hall, Raymond ; CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><description>A Presidential directive issued on January 14, 2004 -- called the new Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) -- set out goals for future exploration of the solar system using manned spacecraft. Those goals included returning to the moon no later than 2020. Although sufficient capabilities exist to meet the projected needs of both the U.S. commercial sector and the government for launching unmanned payloads into space through 2020, that is not the case for manned space flight. The proposed return to the moon called for under the VSE and now planned by NASA could require the development of the capacity to launch payloads weighing more than 100 metric tons. No launch vehicles currently exist that can handle payloads weighing more than about 25 metric tons. Thus, NASA's plans for manned space flight beyond low earth orbit (LEO) could require a significant increase in launch capability. How that capability could be provided and at what cost are the focal points of this study. In considering manned lunar missions, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) explored alternatives that would use existing launch vehicles; those that would require minor modifications to the designs of existing launchers (termed close derivatives); as well as those that would call for major modifications to existing vehicle designs to develop essentially new and much more capable launchers. This analysis presents six alternative programs for developing launchers and estimates their costs under the assumption that manned lunar missions will commence in either 2018 or 2020. Topics discussed include Current Launch Capabilities and Projected Worldwide Demand through 2020; Launch Requirements for the VSE; Alternatives for Future NASA Manned Space-Exploration Capabilities; On-Orbit Assembly, Launch Vehicle Reliability, and Overall Probability of Mission Success; Human Safety on Launch Abort; Schematic Depictions of Launch Vehicle Derivatives; and Cost Estimates for Alternative Launch Systems. The original document contains color images.</description><language>eng</language><subject>ABORT ; Administration and Management ; ASSEMBLY ; Astronautics ; BUDGET OPTIONS ; CONGRESS ; COST ESTIMATES ; Economics and Cost Analysis ; FEDERAL BUDGETS ; HUMAN SAFETY ; LAUNCH CAPABILITIES ; LAUNCH REQUIREMENTS ; LAUNCH VEHICLE ALTERNATIVES ; LAUNCH VEHICLES ; LUNAR EXPLORATION ; MANNED LUNAR MISSIONS ; Manned Spacecraft ; MODIFICATION ; NASA(NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION) ; PAYLOAD ; RELIABILITY ; REQUIREMENTS ; SAFETY ; SPACE MISSIONS ; SPACE TECHNOLOGY ; VSE(VISION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION)</subject><creationdate>2006</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,27544,27545</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA456721$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rehmus, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><title>Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities</title><description>A Presidential directive issued on January 14, 2004 -- called the new Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) -- set out goals for future exploration of the solar system using manned spacecraft. Those goals included returning to the moon no later than 2020. Although sufficient capabilities exist to meet the projected needs of both the U.S. commercial sector and the government for launching unmanned payloads into space through 2020, that is not the case for manned space flight. The proposed return to the moon called for under the VSE and now planned by NASA could require the development of the capacity to launch payloads weighing more than 100 metric tons. No launch vehicles currently exist that can handle payloads weighing more than about 25 metric tons. Thus, NASA's plans for manned space flight beyond low earth orbit (LEO) could require a significant increase in launch capability. How that capability could be provided and at what cost are the focal points of this study. In considering manned lunar missions, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) explored alternatives that would use existing launch vehicles; those that would require minor modifications to the designs of existing launchers (termed close derivatives); as well as those that would call for major modifications to existing vehicle designs to develop essentially new and much more capable launchers. This analysis presents six alternative programs for developing launchers and estimates their costs under the assumption that manned lunar missions will commence in either 2018 or 2020. Topics discussed include Current Launch Capabilities and Projected Worldwide Demand through 2020; Launch Requirements for the VSE; Alternatives for Future NASA Manned Space-Exploration Capabilities; On-Orbit Assembly, Launch Vehicle Reliability, and Overall Probability of Mission Success; Human Safety on Launch Abort; Schematic Depictions of Launch Vehicle Derivatives; and Cost Estimates for Alternative Launch Systems. The original document contains color images.</description><subject>ABORT</subject><subject>Administration and Management</subject><subject>ASSEMBLY</subject><subject>Astronautics</subject><subject>BUDGET OPTIONS</subject><subject>CONGRESS</subject><subject>COST ESTIMATES</subject><subject>Economics and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>FEDERAL BUDGETS</subject><subject>HUMAN SAFETY</subject><subject>LAUNCH CAPABILITIES</subject><subject>LAUNCH REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>LAUNCH VEHICLE ALTERNATIVES</subject><subject>LAUNCH VEHICLES</subject><subject>LUNAR EXPLORATION</subject><subject>MANNED LUNAR MISSIONS</subject><subject>Manned Spacecraft</subject><subject>MODIFICATION</subject><subject>NASA(NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION)</subject><subject>PAYLOAD</subject><subject>RELIABILITY</subject><subject>REQUIREMENTS</subject><subject>SAFETY</subject><subject>SPACE MISSIONS</subject><subject>SPACE TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>VSE(VISION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDBzzClJLcpLLMksSy1WSMsvUnArLSktSlUI1QvWUwguSExO1fVJLM1LzlBwTixITMrMySzJTC3mYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euiklmcnxxSWZeakl8Y4ujiamZuZGhsYEpAGE-Snh</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Rehmus, Paul B</creator><creator>Hall, Raymond</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities</title><author>Rehmus, Paul B ; Hall, Raymond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4567213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>ABORT</topic><topic>Administration and Management</topic><topic>ASSEMBLY</topic><topic>Astronautics</topic><topic>BUDGET OPTIONS</topic><topic>CONGRESS</topic><topic>COST ESTIMATES</topic><topic>Economics and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>FEDERAL BUDGETS</topic><topic>HUMAN SAFETY</topic><topic>LAUNCH CAPABILITIES</topic><topic>LAUNCH REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>LAUNCH VEHICLE ALTERNATIVES</topic><topic>LAUNCH VEHICLES</topic><topic>LUNAR EXPLORATION</topic><topic>MANNED LUNAR MISSIONS</topic><topic>Manned Spacecraft</topic><topic>MODIFICATION</topic><topic>NASA(NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION)</topic><topic>PAYLOAD</topic><topic>RELIABILITY</topic><topic>REQUIREMENTS</topic><topic>SAFETY</topic><topic>SPACE MISSIONS</topic><topic>SPACE TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>VSE(VISION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rehmus, Paul B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rehmus, Paul B</au><au>Hall, Raymond</au><aucorp>CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE (U S CONGRESS) WASHINGTON DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities</btitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><abstract>A Presidential directive issued on January 14, 2004 -- called the new Vision for Space Exploration (VSE) -- set out goals for future exploration of the solar system using manned spacecraft. Those goals included returning to the moon no later than 2020. Although sufficient capabilities exist to meet the projected needs of both the U.S. commercial sector and the government for launching unmanned payloads into space through 2020, that is not the case for manned space flight. The proposed return to the moon called for under the VSE and now planned by NASA could require the development of the capacity to launch payloads weighing more than 100 metric tons. No launch vehicles currently exist that can handle payloads weighing more than about 25 metric tons. Thus, NASA's plans for manned space flight beyond low earth orbit (LEO) could require a significant increase in launch capability. How that capability could be provided and at what cost are the focal points of this study. In considering manned lunar missions, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) explored alternatives that would use existing launch vehicles; those that would require minor modifications to the designs of existing launchers (termed close derivatives); as well as those that would call for major modifications to existing vehicle designs to develop essentially new and much more capable launchers. This analysis presents six alternative programs for developing launchers and estimates their costs under the assumption that manned lunar missions will commence in either 2018 or 2020. Topics discussed include Current Launch Capabilities and Projected Worldwide Demand through 2020; Launch Requirements for the VSE; Alternatives for Future NASA Manned Space-Exploration Capabilities; On-Orbit Assembly, Launch Vehicle Reliability, and Overall Probability of Mission Success; Human Safety on Launch Abort; Schematic Depictions of Launch Vehicle Derivatives; and Cost Estimates for Alternative Launch Systems. The original document contains color images.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA456721
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ABORT
Administration and Management
ASSEMBLY
Astronautics
BUDGET OPTIONS
CONGRESS
COST ESTIMATES
Economics and Cost Analysis
FEDERAL BUDGETS
HUMAN SAFETY
LAUNCH CAPABILITIES
LAUNCH REQUIREMENTS
LAUNCH VEHICLE ALTERNATIVES
LAUNCH VEHICLES
LUNAR EXPLORATION
MANNED LUNAR MISSIONS
Manned Spacecraft
MODIFICATION
NASA(NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION)
PAYLOAD
RELIABILITY
REQUIREMENTS
SAFETY
SPACE MISSIONS
SPACE TECHNOLOGY
VSE(VISION FOR SPACE EXPLORATION)
title Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T04%3A39%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Alternatives%20for%20Future%20U.S.%20Space-Launch%20Capabilities&rft.au=Rehmus,%20Paul%20B&rft.aucorp=CONGRESSIONAL%20BUDGET%20OFFICE%20(U%20S%20CONGRESS)%20WASHINGTON%20DC&rft.date=2006-10&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA456721%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA4567213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true