Loading…

US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes

In the recent events of the Arab Spring the United States carefully chose when and where it would take an overt and proactive role in support for the pro democracy movements. However, the current National Security Strategy states clearly that the United States will be proactive and show global leade...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Patrick S
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Anderson, Patrick S
description In the recent events of the Arab Spring the United States carefully chose when and where it would take an overt and proactive role in support for the pro democracy movements. However, the current National Security Strategy states clearly that the United States will be proactive and show global leadership in support of democratic movements as a matter of policy and principle. While the particular sensitivities of the Arab world may call for a subtle approach, the world watches the United States carefully during such events. The charge of US foreign policy being driven by narrow self-interests such as oil and its own security concerns is a familiar charge by its critics. In cases where the US has intervened for humanitarian reasons the result has often been a demonstration of weak resolve to see the intervention through. While motives are by nature enigmatic, the historical consistency of the US promotion of democracy is unequivocal. In the next few years the United States will be challenged to balance its interests for stability and democracy in the new governments of North Africa. To negotiate these challenges the US government must view success in long term structural democratic development.
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA568394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA568394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5683943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDAMDVYILi0oyC8qUUjLL1JwSc3NTy5KTK5UyMxTcCwtycgvyixJLMpMzFMISk3PzE0t5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropJZnJ8cUlmXmpJfGOLo6mZhbGlibGBKQBvhUomw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Anderson, Patrick S</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Patrick S ; NEAR EAST SOUTH ASIA CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><description>In the recent events of the Arab Spring the United States carefully chose when and where it would take an overt and proactive role in support for the pro democracy movements. However, the current National Security Strategy states clearly that the United States will be proactive and show global leadership in support of democratic movements as a matter of policy and principle. While the particular sensitivities of the Arab world may call for a subtle approach, the world watches the United States carefully during such events. The charge of US foreign policy being driven by narrow self-interests such as oil and its own security concerns is a familiar charge by its critics. In cases where the US has intervened for humanitarian reasons the result has often been a demonstration of weak resolve to see the intervention through. While motives are by nature enigmatic, the historical consistency of the US promotion of democracy is unequivocal. In the next few years the United States will be challenged to balance its interests for stability and democracy in the new governments of North Africa. To negotiate these challenges the US government must view success in long term structural democratic development.</description><language>eng</language><subject>AFRICA ; ARABS ; BALANCE ; CONSISTENCY ; DEMOCRACY ; DEMONSTRATIONS ; EGYPT ; FOREIGN POLICY ; GLOBAL ; Government and Political Science ; HISTORY ; INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ; INTERVENTION ; LEADERSHIP ; LIBYA ; SECURITY ; STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES ; UNITED STATES ; ZIMBABWE</subject><creationdate>2012</creationdate><rights>Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA568394$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Patrick S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEAR EAST SOUTH ASIA CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><title>US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes</title><description>In the recent events of the Arab Spring the United States carefully chose when and where it would take an overt and proactive role in support for the pro democracy movements. However, the current National Security Strategy states clearly that the United States will be proactive and show global leadership in support of democratic movements as a matter of policy and principle. While the particular sensitivities of the Arab world may call for a subtle approach, the world watches the United States carefully during such events. The charge of US foreign policy being driven by narrow self-interests such as oil and its own security concerns is a familiar charge by its critics. In cases where the US has intervened for humanitarian reasons the result has often been a demonstration of weak resolve to see the intervention through. While motives are by nature enigmatic, the historical consistency of the US promotion of democracy is unequivocal. In the next few years the United States will be challenged to balance its interests for stability and democracy in the new governments of North Africa. To negotiate these challenges the US government must view success in long term structural democratic development.</description><subject>AFRICA</subject><subject>ARABS</subject><subject>BALANCE</subject><subject>CONSISTENCY</subject><subject>DEMOCRACY</subject><subject>DEMONSTRATIONS</subject><subject>EGYPT</subject><subject>FOREIGN POLICY</subject><subject>GLOBAL</subject><subject>Government and Political Science</subject><subject>HISTORY</subject><subject>INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS</subject><subject>INTERVENTION</subject><subject>LEADERSHIP</subject><subject>LIBYA</subject><subject>SECURITY</subject><subject>STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES</subject><subject>UNITED STATES</subject><subject>ZIMBABWE</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDAMDVYILi0oyC8qUUjLL1JwSc3NTy5KTK5UyMxTcCwtycgvyixJLMpMzFMISk3PzE0t5mFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHropJZnJ8cUlmXmpJfGOLo6mZhbGlibGBKQBvhUomw</recordid><startdate>20120415</startdate><enddate>20120415</enddate><creator>Anderson, Patrick S</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120415</creationdate><title>US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes</title><author>Anderson, Patrick S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5683943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>AFRICA</topic><topic>ARABS</topic><topic>BALANCE</topic><topic>CONSISTENCY</topic><topic>DEMOCRACY</topic><topic>DEMONSTRATIONS</topic><topic>EGYPT</topic><topic>FOREIGN POLICY</topic><topic>GLOBAL</topic><topic>Government and Political Science</topic><topic>HISTORY</topic><topic>INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS</topic><topic>INTERVENTION</topic><topic>LEADERSHIP</topic><topic>LIBYA</topic><topic>SECURITY</topic><topic>STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES</topic><topic>UNITED STATES</topic><topic>ZIMBABWE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Patrick S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NEAR EAST SOUTH ASIA CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES WASHINGTON DC</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Patrick S</au><aucorp>NEAR EAST SOUTH ASIA CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES WASHINGTON DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes</btitle><date>2012-04-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><abstract>In the recent events of the Arab Spring the United States carefully chose when and where it would take an overt and proactive role in support for the pro democracy movements. However, the current National Security Strategy states clearly that the United States will be proactive and show global leadership in support of democratic movements as a matter of policy and principle. While the particular sensitivities of the Arab world may call for a subtle approach, the world watches the United States carefully during such events. The charge of US foreign policy being driven by narrow self-interests such as oil and its own security concerns is a familiar charge by its critics. In cases where the US has intervened for humanitarian reasons the result has often been a demonstration of weak resolve to see the intervention through. While motives are by nature enigmatic, the historical consistency of the US promotion of democracy is unequivocal. In the next few years the United States will be challenged to balance its interests for stability and democracy in the new governments of North Africa. To negotiate these challenges the US government must view success in long term structural democratic development.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA568394
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects AFRICA
ARABS
BALANCE
CONSISTENCY
DEMOCRACY
DEMONSTRATIONS
EGYPT
FOREIGN POLICY
GLOBAL
Government and Political Science
HISTORY
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
INTERVENTION
LEADERSHIP
LIBYA
SECURITY
STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES
UNITED STATES
ZIMBABWE
title US Support for Democracy in Authoritarian Regimes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=US%20Support%20for%20Democracy%20in%20Authoritarian%20Regimes&rft.au=Anderson,%20Patrick%20S&rft.aucorp=NEAR%20EAST%20SOUTH%20ASIA%20CENTER%20FOR%20STRATEGIC%20STUDIES%20WASHINGTON%20DC&rft.date=2012-04-15&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA568394%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA5683943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true