Loading…

Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?

The cosmology of Deleuze and Guattari emphasises the new. I raise the question of whether this emphasis cancels out two other political virtues, solidarity and heterogeneity, and thereby amounts to a fascism of the new. I reply that what Deleuze and Guattari say about cosmological unity and differen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Deleuze & Guattari Studies 2016-02, Vol.10 (1), p.85-99
Main Author: Evans, Fred
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-6142c02c632d0e8511523effca593bbc3e1bfdcb0a596b8048c5e699a94de01e3
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Deleuze & Guattari Studies
container_volume 10
creator Evans, Fred
description The cosmology of Deleuze and Guattari emphasises the new. I raise the question of whether this emphasis cancels out two other political virtues, solidarity and heterogeneity, and thereby amounts to a fascism of the new. I reply that what Deleuze and Guattari say about cosmological unity and difference suggests that they can avoid this negative designation. I support this conclusion by considering their statements on ethics and politics and by translating their cosmological philosophy into the more immediate ethico-political context of the alloplastic stratum. The latter effort is abetted by elaborating the two thinkers' use of the term 'voice', for example, in Deleuze's statement that Being is the 'single and same voice for the whole thousand-voiced multiple ... a single clamour of Being for all beings' or in the two authors' notion of a 'constellation of voices' that makes up the 'molecular' or 'unconscious' collective assemblage of enunciation. This elaboration is pertinent because political ethics is essentially which voices are heard, and which not, or at least their relative levels of audibility in the alloplastic regime. I further clarify this treatment of Deleuze and Guattari's political ethics by linking it to the idea of parrhesia , courageous speech and hearing.
doi_str_mv 10.3366/dls.2016.0213
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_edinb</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_edinburghupress_primary_10_3366_dls_2016_0213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45331862</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45331862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-6142c02c632d0e8511523effca593bbc3e1bfdcb0a596b8048c5e699a94de01e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVo_cFEU-ps59JvIjUVoWiHvS8JJuJTUmbupMg-utNjQdvnmYGnpmBl7FTAROlrL0sappIEHYCUqg9NhKxMZGwid7_6SGSUotDdkS0ArAAqRkxcYs1dl94Qfy5qau28lnNZ-2y8nTFb_g8I1_Rmjclb5fIH_Hj-pgdlFlNePJbx-x1PnuZ3keLp7uH6c0i8lLaNrJCSw_SWyULwMQIYaTCsvSZSVWee4UiLwufQz_bPAGdeIM2TbNUFwgC1ZidDXe3oXnvkFq3arqw6V86aWKbylgp3atoUD40RAFLtw3VOgufToDbpeKK3UKfitul0vvzwa-obcJfLBXEThulRGJl7_TgsKg2eRfelt02INE_578BO9RwCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576927334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><description>The cosmology of Deleuze and Guattari emphasises the new. I raise the question of whether this emphasis cancels out two other political virtues, solidarity and heterogeneity, and thereby amounts to a fascism of the new. I reply that what Deleuze and Guattari say about cosmological unity and difference suggests that they can avoid this negative designation. I support this conclusion by considering their statements on ethics and politics and by translating their cosmological philosophy into the more immediate ethico-political context of the alloplastic stratum. The latter effort is abetted by elaborating the two thinkers' use of the term 'voice', for example, in Deleuze's statement that Being is the 'single and same voice for the whole thousand-voiced multiple ... a single clamour of Being for all beings' or in the two authors' notion of a 'constellation of voices' that makes up the 'molecular' or 'unconscious' collective assemblage of enunciation. This elaboration is pertinent because political ethics is essentially which voices are heard, and which not, or at least their relative levels of audibility in the alloplastic regime. I further clarify this treatment of Deleuze and Guattari's political ethics by linking it to the idea of parrhesia , courageous speech and hearing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-2241</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2398-9777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-1684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-9785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3366/dls.2016.0213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Edinburgh University Press</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Fascism ; Heterogeneity ; Philosophy and Religion ; Political ethics</subject><ispartof>Deleuze &amp; Guattari Studies, 2016-02, Vol.10 (1), p.85-99</ispartof><rights>Edinburgh University Press 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Edinburgh University Press Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-6142c02c632d0e8511523effca593bbc3e1bfdcb0a596b8048c5e699a94de01e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45331862$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45331862$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33849,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?</title><title>Deleuze &amp; Guattari Studies</title><description>The cosmology of Deleuze and Guattari emphasises the new. I raise the question of whether this emphasis cancels out two other political virtues, solidarity and heterogeneity, and thereby amounts to a fascism of the new. I reply that what Deleuze and Guattari say about cosmological unity and difference suggests that they can avoid this negative designation. I support this conclusion by considering their statements on ethics and politics and by translating their cosmological philosophy into the more immediate ethico-political context of the alloplastic stratum. The latter effort is abetted by elaborating the two thinkers' use of the term 'voice', for example, in Deleuze's statement that Being is the 'single and same voice for the whole thousand-voiced multiple ... a single clamour of Being for all beings' or in the two authors' notion of a 'constellation of voices' that makes up the 'molecular' or 'unconscious' collective assemblage of enunciation. This elaboration is pertinent because political ethics is essentially which voices are heard, and which not, or at least their relative levels of audibility in the alloplastic regime. I further clarify this treatment of Deleuze and Guattari's political ethics by linking it to the idea of parrhesia , courageous speech and hearing.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Fascism</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Philosophy and Religion</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><issn>1750-2241</issn><issn>2398-9777</issn><issn>1755-1684</issn><issn>2398-9785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVo_cFEU-ps59JvIjUVoWiHvS8JJuJTUmbupMg-utNjQdvnmYGnpmBl7FTAROlrL0sappIEHYCUqg9NhKxMZGwid7_6SGSUotDdkS0ArAAqRkxcYs1dl94Qfy5qau28lnNZ-2y8nTFb_g8I1_Rmjclb5fIH_Hj-pgdlFlNePJbx-x1PnuZ3keLp7uH6c0i8lLaNrJCSw_SWyULwMQIYaTCsvSZSVWee4UiLwufQz_bPAGdeIM2TbNUFwgC1ZidDXe3oXnvkFq3arqw6V86aWKbylgp3atoUD40RAFLtw3VOgufToDbpeKK3UKfitul0vvzwa-obcJfLBXEThulRGJl7_TgsKg2eRfelt02INE_578BO9RwCw</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><general>Edinburgh University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?</title><author>Evans, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-6142c02c632d0e8511523effca593bbc3e1bfdcb0a596b8048c5e699a94de01e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Fascism</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Philosophy and Religion</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Deleuze &amp; Guattari Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Fred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?</atitle><jtitle>Deleuze &amp; Guattari Studies</jtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>85-99</pages><issn>1750-2241</issn><issn>2398-9777</issn><eissn>1755-1684</eissn><eissn>2398-9785</eissn><abstract>The cosmology of Deleuze and Guattari emphasises the new. I raise the question of whether this emphasis cancels out two other political virtues, solidarity and heterogeneity, and thereby amounts to a fascism of the new. I reply that what Deleuze and Guattari say about cosmological unity and difference suggests that they can avoid this negative designation. I support this conclusion by considering their statements on ethics and politics and by translating their cosmological philosophy into the more immediate ethico-political context of the alloplastic stratum. The latter effort is abetted by elaborating the two thinkers' use of the term 'voice', for example, in Deleuze's statement that Being is the 'single and same voice for the whole thousand-voiced multiple ... a single clamour of Being for all beings' or in the two authors' notion of a 'constellation of voices' that makes up the 'molecular' or 'unconscious' collective assemblage of enunciation. This elaboration is pertinent because political ethics is essentially which voices are heard, and which not, or at least their relative levels of audibility in the alloplastic regime. I further clarify this treatment of Deleuze and Guattari's political ethics by linking it to the idea of parrhesia , courageous speech and hearing.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Edinburgh University Press</pub><doi>10.3366/dls.2016.0213</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1750-2241
ispartof Deleuze & Guattari Studies, 2016-02, Vol.10 (1), p.85-99
issn 1750-2241
2398-9777
1755-1684
2398-9785
language eng
recordid cdi_edinburghupress_primary_10_3366_dls_2016_0213
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Humanities Index; JSTOR
subjects Ethics
Fascism
Heterogeneity
Philosophy and Religion
Political ethics
title Deleuze's Political Ethics: A Fascism of the New?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_edinb&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deleuze's%20Political%20Ethics:%20A%20Fascism%20of%20the%20New?&rft.jtitle=Deleuze%20&%20Guattari%20Studies&rft.au=Evans,%20Fred&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=85-99&rft.issn=1750-2241&rft.eissn=1755-1684&rft_id=info:doi/10.3366/dls.2016.0213&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_edinb%3E45331862%3C/jstor_edinb%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-6142c02c632d0e8511523effca593bbc3e1bfdcb0a596b8048c5e699a94de01e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576927334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45331862&rfr_iscdi=true