Loading…

Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Toxicity in Human Articular Chondrocytes

Background It has been shown that bupivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for postoperative intra-articular use, is cytotoxic to bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro. Ropivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine for intra-articular analgesia and has less systemic toxicity. We compared t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2008, Vol.90 (5), p.986-991
Main Authors: Piper, Samantha L., BA, Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 991
container_issue 5
container_start_page 986
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 90
creator Piper, Samantha L., BA
Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD
description Background It has been shown that bupivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for postoperative intra-articular use, is cytotoxic to bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro. Ropivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine for intra-articular analgesia and has less systemic toxicity. We compared the in vitro viability of human articular chondrocytes after exposure to bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and saline solution control. Methods Macroscopically normal human articular cartilage was harvested from the femoral head or tibial plateau of five patients. Full-thickness cartilage explants and cultured chondrocytes isolated from these patients were treated with 0.9% normal saline solution, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine for thirty minutes. Twenty-four hours after treatment, chondrocyte viability was measured with use of the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit for cartilage explants and with use of the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay for cultured chondrocytes. Results Chondrocyte viability in cartilage explants was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 78% ± 12.6%; p = 0.0004). There was no difference in viability after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with saline solution (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 95.8% ± 5.7%; p = 0.6). The viability of cultured chondrocytes was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (63.9% ± 19% as compared with 37.4% ± 12% of the value in the saline solution group; p < 0.0001). Conclusions In vitro, 0.5% ropivacaine is significantly less toxic than 0.5% bupivacaine in both intact human articular cartilage and chondrocyte culture. Clinical Relevance Although bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for intra-articular analgesia, the demonstrated toxicity to human articular chondrocytes is cause for concern. The present study demonstrated that ropivacaine is less chondrotoxic than bupivacaine and, therefore, may be safer for intra-articular analgesia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0021-9355(08)72858-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935508728583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0021935508728583</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S0021935508728583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355087285833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj8sKwjAURLNQsD4-QchSF9Wb1mrdCFoU17X7ENKIt9ZEklbs3_tA9ANcDWcYhhlChgwmDNh8egAImL8Mo2gE8XgRxFHshy3ife0O6TpXAMBsBguPpIm5XIVFZzQ1R5qaK96EFKgVFTqnm_rHmbmjxKqhqOm-vghN17ZCWZfC0uRkdG6NbCrl-qR9FKVTg4_2yGq3zZK9r55wQ2W5LFGjFOVZNcoVprb6meOMu4ADfz94LYX4PT8M_y54AKyjV1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Toxicity in Human Articular Chondrocytes</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Piper, Samantha L., BA ; Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Piper, Samantha L., BA ; Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Background It has been shown that bupivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for postoperative intra-articular use, is cytotoxic to bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro. Ropivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine for intra-articular analgesia and has less systemic toxicity. We compared the in vitro viability of human articular chondrocytes after exposure to bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and saline solution control. Methods Macroscopically normal human articular cartilage was harvested from the femoral head or tibial plateau of five patients. Full-thickness cartilage explants and cultured chondrocytes isolated from these patients were treated with 0.9% normal saline solution, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine for thirty minutes. Twenty-four hours after treatment, chondrocyte viability was measured with use of the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit for cartilage explants and with use of the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay for cultured chondrocytes. Results Chondrocyte viability in cartilage explants was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 78% ± 12.6%; p = 0.0004). There was no difference in viability after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with saline solution (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 95.8% ± 5.7%; p = 0.6). The viability of cultured chondrocytes was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (63.9% ± 19% as compared with 37.4% ± 12% of the value in the saline solution group; p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In vitro, 0.5% ropivacaine is significantly less toxic than 0.5% bupivacaine in both intact human articular cartilage and chondrocyte culture. Clinical Relevance Although bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for intra-articular analgesia, the demonstrated toxicity to human articular chondrocytes is cause for concern. The present study demonstrated that ropivacaine is less chondrotoxic than bupivacaine and, therefore, may be safer for intra-articular analgesia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9355(08)72858-3</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Orthopedics</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2008, Vol.90 (5), p.986-991</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piper, Samantha L., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Toxicity in Human Articular Chondrocytes</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><description>Background It has been shown that bupivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for postoperative intra-articular use, is cytotoxic to bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro. Ropivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine for intra-articular analgesia and has less systemic toxicity. We compared the in vitro viability of human articular chondrocytes after exposure to bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and saline solution control. Methods Macroscopically normal human articular cartilage was harvested from the femoral head or tibial plateau of five patients. Full-thickness cartilage explants and cultured chondrocytes isolated from these patients were treated with 0.9% normal saline solution, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine for thirty minutes. Twenty-four hours after treatment, chondrocyte viability was measured with use of the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit for cartilage explants and with use of the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay for cultured chondrocytes. Results Chondrocyte viability in cartilage explants was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 78% ± 12.6%; p = 0.0004). There was no difference in viability after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with saline solution (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 95.8% ± 5.7%; p = 0.6). The viability of cultured chondrocytes was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (63.9% ± 19% as compared with 37.4% ± 12% of the value in the saline solution group; p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In vitro, 0.5% ropivacaine is significantly less toxic than 0.5% bupivacaine in both intact human articular cartilage and chondrocyte culture. Clinical Relevance Although bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for intra-articular analgesia, the demonstrated toxicity to human articular chondrocytes is cause for concern. The present study demonstrated that ropivacaine is less chondrotoxic than bupivacaine and, therefore, may be safer for intra-articular analgesia.</description><subject>Orthopedics</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj8sKwjAURLNQsD4-QchSF9Wb1mrdCFoU17X7ENKIt9ZEklbs3_tA9ANcDWcYhhlChgwmDNh8egAImL8Mo2gE8XgRxFHshy3ife0O6TpXAMBsBguPpIm5XIVFZzQ1R5qaK96EFKgVFTqnm_rHmbmjxKqhqOm-vghN17ZCWZfC0uRkdG6NbCrl-qR9FKVTg4_2yGq3zZK9r55wQ2W5LFGjFOVZNcoVprb6meOMu4ADfz94LYX4PT8M_y54AKyjV1w</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Piper, Samantha L., BA</creator><creator>Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Toxicity in Human Articular Chondrocytes</title><author>Piper, Samantha L., BA ; Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355087285833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Orthopedics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piper, Samantha L., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piper, Samantha L., BA</au><au>Kim, Hubert T., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Toxicity in Human Articular Chondrocytes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>986</spage><epage>991</epage><pages>986-991</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><abstract>Background It has been shown that bupivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for postoperative intra-articular use, is cytotoxic to bovine articular chondrocytes in vitro. Ropivacaine is as effective as bupivacaine for intra-articular analgesia and has less systemic toxicity. We compared the in vitro viability of human articular chondrocytes after exposure to bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and saline solution control. Methods Macroscopically normal human articular cartilage was harvested from the femoral head or tibial plateau of five patients. Full-thickness cartilage explants and cultured chondrocytes isolated from these patients were treated with 0.9% normal saline solution, 0.5% ropivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine for thirty minutes. Twenty-four hours after treatment, chondrocyte viability was measured with use of the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit for cartilage explants and with use of the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay for cultured chondrocytes. Results Chondrocyte viability in cartilage explants was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 78% ± 12.6%; p = 0.0004). There was no difference in viability after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with saline solution (94.4% ± 9.0% compared with 95.8% ± 5.7%; p = 0.6). The viability of cultured chondrocytes was significantly greater after treatment with ropivacaine as compared with bupivacaine (63.9% ± 19% as compared with 37.4% ± 12% of the value in the saline solution group; p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions In vitro, 0.5% ropivacaine is significantly less toxic than 0.5% bupivacaine in both intact human articular cartilage and chondrocyte culture. Clinical Relevance Although bupivacaine is the most commonly used local anesthetic for intra-articular analgesia, the demonstrated toxicity to human articular chondrocytes is cause for concern. The present study demonstrated that ropivacaine is less chondrotoxic than bupivacaine and, therefore, may be safer for intra-articular analgesia.</abstract><doi>10.1016/S0021-9355(08)72858-3</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2008, Vol.90 (5), p.986-991
issn 0021-9355
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0021935508728583
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
subjects Orthopedics
title Comparison of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Toxicity in Human Articular Chondrocytes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A12%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Ropivacaine%20and%20Bupivacaine%20Toxicity%20in%20Human%20Articular%20Chondrocytes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Piper,%20Samantha%20L.,%20BA&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=986&rft.epage=991&rft.pages=986-991&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9355(08)72858-3&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S0021935508728583%3C/elsevier%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S00219355087285833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true