Loading…

Variation in loco-regional prostate cancer care and treatment trends at Commission on Cancer designated facilities: A National Cancer Data Base analysis 2004-2013

Abstract MicroAbstract Within the National Cancer Data Base we evaluated whether differences in treatment patterns for prostate cancer exist at Commission on Cancer facilities. Overall, 825,707 men were included in the retrospective analyses. We found substantial variation in treatment patterns betw...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical genitourinary cancer 2017
Main Authors: Löppenberg, Björn, MD, Sood, Akshay, MD, Dalela, Deepansh, MD, Karabon, Patrick, MSc, Sammon, Jesse, DO, Vetterlein, Malte W., MD, Noldus, Joachim, MD, Peabody, James O., MD, Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD, Menon, Mani, MD, Abdollah, Firas, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Clinical genitourinary cancer
container_volume
creator Löppenberg, Björn, MD
Sood, Akshay, MD
Dalela, Deepansh, MD
Karabon, Patrick, MSc
Sammon, Jesse, DO
Vetterlein, Malte W., MD
Noldus, Joachim, MD
Peabody, James O., MD
Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD
Menon, Mani, MD
Abdollah, Firas, MD
description Abstract MicroAbstract Within the National Cancer Data Base we evaluated whether differences in treatment patterns for prostate cancer exist at Commission on Cancer facilities. Overall, 825,707 men were included in the retrospective analyses. We found substantial variation in treatment patterns between different facility types and individual institutions, as well. Our findings indicate a necessity for policy makers to harmonize prostate cancer treatment. Background Contemporary treatment trends for prostate cancer show increased rates of active surveillance. However, nationwide applicability of these reports is limited. Additionally, the impact of Commission on Cancer facility type on prostate cancer treatment patterns is unknown. Patients and methods We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2013. Our cohort was stratified based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk-classes. Cochran-Armitage tests evaluated temporal trends. Random effects hierarchical logit models assessed treatment variation at Commission on Cancer-facility and institution level. Results In 825,707 men, utilization of radiation therapy declined and utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for all prostate cancer risk-groups between 2004-2013 (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1558767317300988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1558767317300988</els_id><sourcerecordid>1_s2_0_S1558767317300988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S15587673173009883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj01OxDAMhbMAieHnAqx8gZakP9PCAgkGRqzYgNhWVuqpXNIUxQFprsNJSWFugGTp-Un2Zz-lLo3OjTbrqzG3brB5oU2T6yrXpjpSK1PXbdasm_JEnYqMWle1afRKfb9hYIw8e2APbrZzFmhIFh18hFkiRgKL3lJIEgjQ9xADYZzIx6XzvQBG2MzTxCILKNXmb6Mn4cEnRA87tOw4MskN3MHz78l04zD4gBHhHmXho9sLCxTpxyyFKM_V8Q6d0MVBz9Tt9vF185RRMl9MobOOPVt077QnGefPkBjSmU6KTncvS_QluWlKra_btvw34AdPLHLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in loco-regional prostate cancer care and treatment trends at Commission on Cancer designated facilities: A National Cancer Data Base analysis 2004-2013</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Löppenberg, Björn, MD ; Sood, Akshay, MD ; Dalela, Deepansh, MD ; Karabon, Patrick, MSc ; Sammon, Jesse, DO ; Vetterlein, Malte W., MD ; Noldus, Joachim, MD ; Peabody, James O., MD ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD ; Menon, Mani, MD ; Abdollah, Firas, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Löppenberg, Björn, MD ; Sood, Akshay, MD ; Dalela, Deepansh, MD ; Karabon, Patrick, MSc ; Sammon, Jesse, DO ; Vetterlein, Malte W., MD ; Noldus, Joachim, MD ; Peabody, James O., MD ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD ; Menon, Mani, MD ; Abdollah, Firas, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract MicroAbstract Within the National Cancer Data Base we evaluated whether differences in treatment patterns for prostate cancer exist at Commission on Cancer facilities. Overall, 825,707 men were included in the retrospective analyses. We found substantial variation in treatment patterns between different facility types and individual institutions, as well. Our findings indicate a necessity for policy makers to harmonize prostate cancer treatment. Background Contemporary treatment trends for prostate cancer show increased rates of active surveillance. However, nationwide applicability of these reports is limited. Additionally, the impact of Commission on Cancer facility type on prostate cancer treatment patterns is unknown. Patients and methods We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2013. Our cohort was stratified based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk-classes. Cochran-Armitage tests evaluated temporal trends. Random effects hierarchical logit models assessed treatment variation at Commission on Cancer-facility and institution level. Results In 825,707 men, utilization of radiation therapy declined and utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for all prostate cancer risk-groups between 2004-2013 (p&lt;0.0001). Observation for low-risk prostate cancer increased from 16.3% in 2004-2005 to 32.0% in 2012-2013 (p&lt;0.0001). Significant treatment variation was observed based on Commission on Cancer-facility type. Across all risk-groups, the lowest rates of radical prostatectomy and highest rates of external beam radiation therapy were observed in community cancer programs. The highest rates of observation for low-risk disease were observed in academic centers. Treatment variation according to institution ranged from 14% (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.15) for androgen deprivation therapy up to 59% (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.73) for cryotherapy. Conclusion The increased utilization of observation in low-risk prostate cancer is an encouraging finding, which appears to be mainly derived by a decrease in radiotherapy utilization in this risk group. Regardless of tumor characteristics, significant variations in treatment modality exist among different facility types and institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-7673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.014</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Löppenberg, Björn, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Akshay, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalela, Deepansh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabon, Patrick, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammon, Jesse, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noldus, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peabody, James O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Mani, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollah, Firas, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in loco-regional prostate cancer care and treatment trends at Commission on Cancer designated facilities: A National Cancer Data Base analysis 2004-2013</title><title>Clinical genitourinary cancer</title><description>Abstract MicroAbstract Within the National Cancer Data Base we evaluated whether differences in treatment patterns for prostate cancer exist at Commission on Cancer facilities. Overall, 825,707 men were included in the retrospective analyses. We found substantial variation in treatment patterns between different facility types and individual institutions, as well. Our findings indicate a necessity for policy makers to harmonize prostate cancer treatment. Background Contemporary treatment trends for prostate cancer show increased rates of active surveillance. However, nationwide applicability of these reports is limited. Additionally, the impact of Commission on Cancer facility type on prostate cancer treatment patterns is unknown. Patients and methods We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2013. Our cohort was stratified based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk-classes. Cochran-Armitage tests evaluated temporal trends. Random effects hierarchical logit models assessed treatment variation at Commission on Cancer-facility and institution level. Results In 825,707 men, utilization of radiation therapy declined and utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for all prostate cancer risk-groups between 2004-2013 (p&lt;0.0001). Observation for low-risk prostate cancer increased from 16.3% in 2004-2005 to 32.0% in 2012-2013 (p&lt;0.0001). Significant treatment variation was observed based on Commission on Cancer-facility type. Across all risk-groups, the lowest rates of radical prostatectomy and highest rates of external beam radiation therapy were observed in community cancer programs. The highest rates of observation for low-risk disease were observed in academic centers. Treatment variation according to institution ranged from 14% (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.15) for androgen deprivation therapy up to 59% (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.73) for cryotherapy. Conclusion The increased utilization of observation in low-risk prostate cancer is an encouraging finding, which appears to be mainly derived by a decrease in radiotherapy utilization in this risk group. Regardless of tumor characteristics, significant variations in treatment modality exist among different facility types and institutions.</description><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1558-7673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj01OxDAMhbMAieHnAqx8gZakP9PCAgkGRqzYgNhWVuqpXNIUxQFprsNJSWFugGTp-Un2Zz-lLo3OjTbrqzG3brB5oU2T6yrXpjpSK1PXbdasm_JEnYqMWle1afRKfb9hYIw8e2APbrZzFmhIFh18hFkiRgKL3lJIEgjQ9xADYZzIx6XzvQBG2MzTxCILKNXmb6Mn4cEnRA87tOw4MskN3MHz78l04zD4gBHhHmXho9sLCxTpxyyFKM_V8Q6d0MVBz9Tt9vF185RRMl9MobOOPVt077QnGefPkBjSmU6KTncvS_QluWlKra_btvw34AdPLHLw</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Löppenberg, Björn, MD</creator><creator>Sood, Akshay, MD</creator><creator>Dalela, Deepansh, MD</creator><creator>Karabon, Patrick, MSc</creator><creator>Sammon, Jesse, DO</creator><creator>Vetterlein, Malte W., MD</creator><creator>Noldus, Joachim, MD</creator><creator>Peabody, James O., MD</creator><creator>Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD</creator><creator>Menon, Mani, MD</creator><creator>Abdollah, Firas, MD</creator><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Variation in loco-regional prostate cancer care and treatment trends at Commission on Cancer designated facilities: A National Cancer Data Base analysis 2004-2013</title><author>Löppenberg, Björn, MD ; Sood, Akshay, MD ; Dalela, Deepansh, MD ; Karabon, Patrick, MSc ; Sammon, Jesse, DO ; Vetterlein, Malte W., MD ; Noldus, Joachim, MD ; Peabody, James O., MD ; Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD ; Menon, Mani, MD ; Abdollah, Firas, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S15587673173009883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Löppenberg, Björn, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Akshay, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalela, Deepansh, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karabon, Patrick, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sammon, Jesse, DO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetterlein, Malte W., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noldus, Joachim, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peabody, James O., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menon, Mani, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollah, Firas, MD</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Clinical genitourinary cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Löppenberg, Björn, MD</au><au>Sood, Akshay, MD</au><au>Dalela, Deepansh, MD</au><au>Karabon, Patrick, MSc</au><au>Sammon, Jesse, DO</au><au>Vetterlein, Malte W., MD</au><au>Noldus, Joachim, MD</au><au>Peabody, James O., MD</au><au>Trinh, Quoc-Dien, MD</au><au>Menon, Mani, MD</au><au>Abdollah, Firas, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in loco-regional prostate cancer care and treatment trends at Commission on Cancer designated facilities: A National Cancer Data Base analysis 2004-2013</atitle><jtitle>Clinical genitourinary cancer</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issn>1558-7673</issn><abstract>Abstract MicroAbstract Within the National Cancer Data Base we evaluated whether differences in treatment patterns for prostate cancer exist at Commission on Cancer facilities. Overall, 825,707 men were included in the retrospective analyses. We found substantial variation in treatment patterns between different facility types and individual institutions, as well. Our findings indicate a necessity for policy makers to harmonize prostate cancer treatment. Background Contemporary treatment trends for prostate cancer show increased rates of active surveillance. However, nationwide applicability of these reports is limited. Additionally, the impact of Commission on Cancer facility type on prostate cancer treatment patterns is unknown. Patients and methods We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2013. Our cohort was stratified based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk-classes. Cochran-Armitage tests evaluated temporal trends. Random effects hierarchical logit models assessed treatment variation at Commission on Cancer-facility and institution level. Results In 825,707 men, utilization of radiation therapy declined and utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for all prostate cancer risk-groups between 2004-2013 (p&lt;0.0001). Observation for low-risk prostate cancer increased from 16.3% in 2004-2005 to 32.0% in 2012-2013 (p&lt;0.0001). Significant treatment variation was observed based on Commission on Cancer-facility type. Across all risk-groups, the lowest rates of radical prostatectomy and highest rates of external beam radiation therapy were observed in community cancer programs. The highest rates of observation for low-risk disease were observed in academic centers. Treatment variation according to institution ranged from 14% (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.15) for androgen deprivation therapy up to 59% (95% confidence interval 0.45-0.73) for cryotherapy. Conclusion The increased utilization of observation in low-risk prostate cancer is an encouraging finding, which appears to be mainly derived by a decrease in radiotherapy utilization in this risk group. Regardless of tumor characteristics, significant variations in treatment modality exist among different facility types and institutions.</abstract><doi>10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.014</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-7673
ispartof Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017
issn 1558-7673
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1558767317300988
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Urology
title Variation in loco-regional prostate cancer care and treatment trends at Commission on Cancer designated facilities: A National Cancer Data Base analysis 2004-2013
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A11%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20loco-regional%20prostate%20cancer%20care%20and%20treatment%20trends%20at%20Commission%20on%20Cancer%20designated%20facilities:%20A%20National%20Cancer%20Data%20Base%20analysis%202004-2013&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20genitourinary%20cancer&rft.au=L%C3%B6ppenberg,%20Bj%C3%B6rn,%20MD&rft.date=2017&rft.issn=1558-7673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.014&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3E1_s2_0_S1558767317300988%3C/elsevier%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S15587673173009883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true