Loading…

Perfusion SPECT, SISCOM and PET18 F-FDG in the assessment of drug-refractory epilepsy patients candidates for epilepsy surgery

Abstract Aims Brain perfusion SPECT (ictal–interictal), SPECT images and subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (SISCOM) and18 F-FDG-PET (interictal) play an important role in the pre-surgical diagnosis of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. This study aimed to establish the reproducib...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista Española de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular (English ed.) 2015, Vol.34 (6), p.350-357
Main Authors: Suárez-Piñera, M, Mestre-Fusco, A, Ley, M, González, S, Medrano, S, Principe, A, Mojal, S, Conesa, G, Rocamora, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aims Brain perfusion SPECT (ictal–interictal), SPECT images and subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI (SISCOM) and18 F-FDG-PET (interictal) play an important role in the pre-surgical diagnosis of patients with medically refractory epilepsy. This study aimed to establish the reproducibility of visual ictal–interictal SPECT and SISCOM analysis altogether with the capacity of SPECT, SISCOM and PET to determine the epileptogenic zone. Material and methods99m Tc-HMPAO SPECT ictal–interictal and SISCOM (Analyze 7.0) were performed on 47 refractory epilepsy patients (24 F, 19–60 yrs). In 13 patients, SISCOM was also performed using a new programme (Focus DET). Ictal–interictal SPECT and SISCOM images were analyzed independently by two nuclear medicine physicians (observers 1 and 2). Kappa concordance coefficient was used to evaluate the reproducibility. In sixteen patients, SPECT, SISCOM and PET findings were compared with the resected area during the surgery, and surgical outcome using Engel scale or with the stereo EEG-(SEEG). Results The ictal–interictal SPECT interobserver agreement was 91%, Kappa index 0.86, SISCOM (Analyze 7.0) interobserver agreement percentage was 82%, Kappa index 0.80, Analyze 7.0 showed a higher inconclusive results than visual SPECT analysis. SISCOM FocusDET interobserver agreement was 92%, Kappa index 0.87, with lower inconclusive results than Analyze 7.0. SPECT, SISCOM and PET combined findings identified 87% seizure onset zone: 79% temporal, 26% parieto-temporal and 7% frontal. Conclusions Ictal–interictal SPECT and SISCOM showed a high reproducibility in this sample of patients with drug-refractory epilepsy. SPECT, SISCOM and PET combined findings improved detection of epileptogenic zone in comparison with the individual assessment.
ISSN:2253-8089
2253-8089
DOI:10.1016/j.remnie.2015.09.004