Loading…

Phase 1 DAVIO Trial: EYP-1901 Bioerodible, Sustained-Delivery Vorolanib Insert in Patients with Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration

AbstractPurposeTo evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901, an intravitreal insert containing vorolanib, a pan–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor packaged in a bioerodible delivery technology (Durasert E™) for sustained delivery, in patients with wet age-related macular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ophthalmology science (Online) 2024, p.100527-100527
Main Authors: Patel, Sunil, MD, PhD, Storey, Philip P., MD, Barakat, Mark R., MD, Hershberger, Vrinda, MD, Bridges, William Z., MD, Eichenbaum, David A., MD, Lally, David R., MD, PhD, Boyer, David S., MD, Bakri, Sophie J., MD, Roy, Monica, OD, MPH, Paggiarino, Dario A., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:AbstractPurposeTo evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901, an intravitreal insert containing vorolanib, a pan–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor packaged in a bioerodible delivery technology (Durasert E™) for sustained delivery, in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF therapy. DesignPhase 1, multicenter, prospective, open-label, dose-escalation trial. ParticipantsPatients with wAMD and evidence of prior anti-VEGF therapy response. MethodsPatients received a single intravitreal injection of EYP-1901. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of EYP-1901. Secondary objectives assessed biologic activity of EYP-1901 including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST). Exploratory analyses included reduction in anti-VEGF treatment burden and supplemental injection-free rates. ResultsSeventeen patients enrolled in the 440 μg (3 patients), 1030 μg (1 patient), 2060 μg (8 patients), and 3090 μg (5 patients) dose cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicity, ocular serious adverse events (AEs), or systemic AEs related to EYP-1901 were observed. There was no evidence of ocular or systemic toxicity related to vorolanib or the delivery technology. Moderate ocular treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) included reduced visual acuity (2/17) and retinal exudates (3/17). One patient with reduced BCVA had 3 separate reductions of 17, 18, and 16 letters, and another had a single drop of 25 letters. One severe TEAE, neovascular AMD (i.e., worsening/progressive disease activity), was reported in 1 of 17 study eyes but deemed unrelated to treatment. Mean change from baseline (CFB) in BCVA was –3.7 letters and –5.4 letters at 6 and 12 months. Mean CFB in CST was +1.7 μm and +2.3 μm at 6 and 12 months. Reduction in treatment burden was 76% and 72% at 6 and 12 months. Of 16 study eyes, 13, 9, and 6 were injection-free up to 3, 6, and 12 months. ConclusionIn the DAVIO trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04747197), EYP-1901 had a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated in previously treated eyes with wAMD. Measures of biologic activity remained relatively stable following a single EYP-1901 injection. These preliminary data support ongoing Phase 2 and planned Phase 3 trials to assess efficacy and safety.
ISSN:2666-9145
2666-9145
DOI:10.1016/j.xops.2024.100527