Loading…

Safeguarding Lungs: Evaluating Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Rituximab-Inclusive Therapies

Background:Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection, which is frequently observed in immunocompromised patients. Although T-cell immunity is classically related to Pneumocystis defense, recent data support roles for B lymphocytes in the development of PCP in animals, and we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2024-11, Vol.144, p.1661-1661
Main Authors: Sharma, Anubhuti, Sharma, Arundhati, Daid, Simranpreet Singh, Sharma, Vagisha, Agrawal, Akriti, Rao, Adishwar, Poulose, Joyson
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1661
container_issue
container_start_page 1661
container_title Blood
container_volume 144
creator Sharma, Anubhuti
Sharma, Arundhati
Daid, Simranpreet Singh
Sharma, Vagisha
Agrawal, Akriti
Rao, Adishwar
Poulose, Joyson
description Background:Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection, which is frequently observed in immunocompromised patients. Although T-cell immunity is classically related to Pneumocystis defense, recent data support roles for B lymphocytes in the development of PCP in animals, and we have observed several cases of PCP in patients receiving rituximab. These observations prompted a systematic review and meta-analysis of our experience to see the efficacy of PCP prophylaxis (TMP-SMX) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. The efficacy of PCP prophylaxis in this population remains a subject of clinical interest. Research Question: To evaluate the effect of PCP prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis on the risk of developing PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. Methods: We conducted meta-analysis including six retrospective cohort studies that compared the incidence of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab with and without prophylaxis. The cohort studies with incept up to January 2023 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, PLOS ONE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction was done using a spreadsheet, and data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4.1 for meta-analysis. Results: The analysis included 2304 patients, with 571 receiving PCP prophylaxis and 1733 did not receive prophylaxis. Studies reporting results of PCP prophylaxis were included. Enrolled studies were quality assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The incidence of PCP was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group (3 out of 571) compared to the no prophylaxis group (67 out of 1733). The pooled risk ratio (RR) was 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.58], indicating a 77% reduction in the risk of PCP with prophylaxis. Conclusion: The clinical course of cases of PCP in patients treated with rituximab can be quite fulminant, with significant mortality. Primary prophylaxis should be considered in patients at risk. PCP prophylaxis significantly decrease the risk of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-based therapies, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.23. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
doi_str_mv 10.1182/blood-2024-211600
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2024_211600</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006497124044082</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0006497124044082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2024_2116003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj0tOwzAURT0AifJZADNvwGC7ofyGqAikDqrSueU6r8lDjh35EzUT1o5DuwNGV_dI90qHkFvB74R4kvc7633NJJcVk0IsOD8jM875glXPj-KCXMb4zbmo5vJhRn6-9B6arEONrqGr7Jr4QpeDtlmniawd5M6bMSaMp-JQ03XwfTtafSgUHV2NXd_6rvCyApci3YABHKaHDaZ8wE7v2KczNkccgG5bCLpHiNfkfK9thJtTXpHX9-X27YNBKQNCUNGUQwM1BjBJ1R6V4GrSVH-aatJUR835_9a_BDJnBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safeguarding Lungs: Evaluating Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Rituximab-Inclusive Therapies</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Sharma, Anubhuti ; Sharma, Arundhati ; Daid, Simranpreet Singh ; Sharma, Vagisha ; Agrawal, Akriti ; Rao, Adishwar ; Poulose, Joyson</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anubhuti ; Sharma, Arundhati ; Daid, Simranpreet Singh ; Sharma, Vagisha ; Agrawal, Akriti ; Rao, Adishwar ; Poulose, Joyson</creatorcontrib><description>Background:Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection, which is frequently observed in immunocompromised patients. Although T-cell immunity is classically related to Pneumocystis defense, recent data support roles for B lymphocytes in the development of PCP in animals, and we have observed several cases of PCP in patients receiving rituximab. These observations prompted a systematic review and meta-analysis of our experience to see the efficacy of PCP prophylaxis (TMP-SMX) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. The efficacy of PCP prophylaxis in this population remains a subject of clinical interest. Research Question: To evaluate the effect of PCP prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis on the risk of developing PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. Methods: We conducted meta-analysis including six retrospective cohort studies that compared the incidence of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab with and without prophylaxis. The cohort studies with incept up to January 2023 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, PLOS ONE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction was done using a spreadsheet, and data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4.1 for meta-analysis. Results: The analysis included 2304 patients, with 571 receiving PCP prophylaxis and 1733 did not receive prophylaxis. Studies reporting results of PCP prophylaxis were included. Enrolled studies were quality assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The incidence of PCP was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group (3 out of 571) compared to the no prophylaxis group (67 out of 1733). The pooled risk ratio (RR) was 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.58], indicating a 77% reduction in the risk of PCP with prophylaxis. Conclusion: The clinical course of cases of PCP in patients treated with rituximab can be quite fulminant, with significant mortality. Primary prophylaxis should be considered in patients at risk. PCP prophylaxis significantly decrease the risk of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-based therapies, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.23. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-4971</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1182/blood-2024-211600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Blood, 2024-11, Vol.144, p.1661-1661</ispartof><rights>2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497124044082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anubhuti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Arundhati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daid, Simranpreet Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vagisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Akriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Adishwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulose, Joyson</creatorcontrib><title>Safeguarding Lungs: Evaluating Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Rituximab-Inclusive Therapies</title><title>Blood</title><description>Background:Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection, which is frequently observed in immunocompromised patients. Although T-cell immunity is classically related to Pneumocystis defense, recent data support roles for B lymphocytes in the development of PCP in animals, and we have observed several cases of PCP in patients receiving rituximab. These observations prompted a systematic review and meta-analysis of our experience to see the efficacy of PCP prophylaxis (TMP-SMX) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. The efficacy of PCP prophylaxis in this population remains a subject of clinical interest. Research Question: To evaluate the effect of PCP prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis on the risk of developing PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. Methods: We conducted meta-analysis including six retrospective cohort studies that compared the incidence of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab with and without prophylaxis. The cohort studies with incept up to January 2023 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, PLOS ONE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction was done using a spreadsheet, and data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4.1 for meta-analysis. Results: The analysis included 2304 patients, with 571 receiving PCP prophylaxis and 1733 did not receive prophylaxis. Studies reporting results of PCP prophylaxis were included. Enrolled studies were quality assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The incidence of PCP was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group (3 out of 571) compared to the no prophylaxis group (67 out of 1733). The pooled risk ratio (RR) was 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.58], indicating a 77% reduction in the risk of PCP with prophylaxis. Conclusion: The clinical course of cases of PCP in patients treated with rituximab can be quite fulminant, with significant mortality. Primary prophylaxis should be considered in patients at risk. PCP prophylaxis significantly decrease the risk of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-based therapies, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.23. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</description><issn>0006-4971</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqlj0tOwzAURT0AifJZADNvwGC7ofyGqAikDqrSueU6r8lDjh35EzUT1o5DuwNGV_dI90qHkFvB74R4kvc7633NJJcVk0IsOD8jM875glXPj-KCXMb4zbmo5vJhRn6-9B6arEONrqGr7Jr4QpeDtlmniawd5M6bMSaMp-JQ03XwfTtafSgUHV2NXd_6rvCyApci3YABHKaHDaZ8wE7v2KczNkccgG5bCLpHiNfkfK9thJtTXpHX9-X27YNBKQNCUNGUQwM1BjBJ1R6V4GrSVH-aatJUR835_9a_BDJnBg</recordid><startdate>20241105</startdate><enddate>20241105</enddate><creator>Sharma, Anubhuti</creator><creator>Sharma, Arundhati</creator><creator>Daid, Simranpreet Singh</creator><creator>Sharma, Vagisha</creator><creator>Agrawal, Akriti</creator><creator>Rao, Adishwar</creator><creator>Poulose, Joyson</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20241105</creationdate><title>Safeguarding Lungs: Evaluating Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Rituximab-Inclusive Therapies</title><author>Sharma, Anubhuti ; Sharma, Arundhati ; Daid, Simranpreet Singh ; Sharma, Vagisha ; Agrawal, Akriti ; Rao, Adishwar ; Poulose, Joyson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2024_2116003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anubhuti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Arundhati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daid, Simranpreet Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vagisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Akriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Adishwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poulose, Joyson</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Blood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Anubhuti</au><au>Sharma, Arundhati</au><au>Daid, Simranpreet Singh</au><au>Sharma, Vagisha</au><au>Agrawal, Akriti</au><au>Rao, Adishwar</au><au>Poulose, Joyson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safeguarding Lungs: Evaluating Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Rituximab-Inclusive Therapies</atitle><jtitle>Blood</jtitle><date>2024-11-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>144</volume><spage>1661</spage><epage>1661</epage><pages>1661-1661</pages><issn>0006-4971</issn><abstract>Background:Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is an opportunistic fungal infection, which is frequently observed in immunocompromised patients. Although T-cell immunity is classically related to Pneumocystis defense, recent data support roles for B lymphocytes in the development of PCP in animals, and we have observed several cases of PCP in patients receiving rituximab. These observations prompted a systematic review and meta-analysis of our experience to see the efficacy of PCP prophylaxis (TMP-SMX) in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. The efficacy of PCP prophylaxis in this population remains a subject of clinical interest. Research Question: To evaluate the effect of PCP prophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis on the risk of developing PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab. Methods: We conducted meta-analysis including six retrospective cohort studies that compared the incidence of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab with and without prophylaxis. The cohort studies with incept up to January 2023 were retrieved from databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, PLOS ONE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data extraction was done using a spreadsheet, and data analysis was done using RevMan 5.4.1 for meta-analysis. Results: The analysis included 2304 patients, with 571 receiving PCP prophylaxis and 1733 did not receive prophylaxis. Studies reporting results of PCP prophylaxis were included. Enrolled studies were quality assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The incidence of PCP was significantly lower in the prophylaxis group (3 out of 571) compared to the no prophylaxis group (67 out of 1733). The pooled risk ratio (RR) was 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.58], indicating a 77% reduction in the risk of PCP with prophylaxis. Conclusion: The clinical course of cases of PCP in patients treated with rituximab can be quite fulminant, with significant mortality. Primary prophylaxis should be considered in patients at risk. PCP prophylaxis significantly decrease the risk of PCP in lymphoma patients receiving rituximab-based therapies, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.23. No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1182/blood-2024-211600</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-4971
ispartof Blood, 2024-11, Vol.144, p.1661-1661
issn 0006-4971
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2024_211600
source ScienceDirect®
title Safeguarding Lungs: Evaluating Pneumocystis Pneumonia Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Receiving Rituximab-Inclusive Therapies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A58%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safeguarding%20Lungs:%20Evaluating%20Pneumocystis%20Pneumonia%20Prophylaxis%20in%20Lymphoma%20Patients%20Receiving%20Rituximab-Inclusive%20Therapies&rft.jtitle=Blood&rft.au=Sharma,%20Anubhuti&rft.date=2024-11-05&rft.volume=144&rft.spage=1661&rft.epage=1661&rft.pages=1661-1661&rft.issn=0006-4971&rft_id=info:doi/10.1182/blood-2024-211600&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3ES0006497124044082%3C/elsevier%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1182_blood_2024_2116003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true