Loading…

Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farmsUSDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer

Our objective was to characterize dairy farming strategies in Pennsylvania to provide baseline data for modeling and assessing economic and environmental impacts of the industry. The USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data were used to characterize management practices for 5 dairy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Animal Science 2019-06, Vol.35 (3), p.325-338
Main Authors: Holly, Michael A., Gunn, Kpoti M., Rotz, C. Alan, Kleinman, Peter J.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 338
container_issue 3
container_start_page 325
container_title Applied Animal Science
container_volume 35
creator Holly, Michael A.
Gunn, Kpoti M.
Rotz, C. Alan
Kleinman, Peter J.A.
description Our objective was to characterize dairy farming strategies in Pennsylvania to provide baseline data for modeling and assessing economic and environmental impacts of the industry. The USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data were used to characterize management practices for 5 dairy farm strategies and 4 herd size categories. Production strategies were confinement, semi-confinement, organic, management intensive rotational grazing, and Amish (use of draft animals with no use of electricity or mobile, powered equipment). Cattle breed and homegrown and purchased feed type and quantity differed significantly among the 5 strategies, whereas housing and manure management varied with herd size. Solid manure handling was used on 41% of farms, consistent with small herd sizes and wide use of tiestall housing (34% of farms). Confinement dairy farms maintained more cows with greater milk production per cow and had more crop area per cow with less reliance on purchased feeds than the weighted average dairy farm. These farms received the lowest net return per unit of milk, which is consistent with a reduction in the number of small confinement farms from the year 2000 to 2010. Although organic dairy producers had 37% greater variable costs, primarily from the high cost of organic feeds, these farms received the greatest return per unit of milk sold through a 51% greater milk price received. Management practices found on Pennsylvania dairy farms around the year 2010 are documented to support further assessment of production practices and sustainability of the industry.
doi_str_mv 10.15232/aas.2018-01833
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_15232_aas_2018_01833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2590286519300552</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2590286519300552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_15232_aas_2018_018333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqlj09LxDAUxIO44KJ79vq-QNc0tdIexT94EYTVc3gkr7tP2qTmZQv99tbFg3cPw8wwzOGn1HWpt2VtKnODKFujy6ZYVFVnam3qVhemuavP_-QLtRH51FqbRt82pl2rwysG3NNAIYM7YEKXKbFkdgKxgzcKQeZ-wsAIHjnN0GEa5GP3eA8sgAHo64g9xHGMKR8D5xnGFCf2lJbVAw1jH2dKV2rVYS-0-fVL1T4_vT-8FLSUiSlZcUzBkedELlsf2ZbanujsQmd_6OyJrvrP9xsES15x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farmsUSDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Holly, Michael A. ; Gunn, Kpoti M. ; Rotz, C. Alan ; Kleinman, Peter J.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Holly, Michael A. ; Gunn, Kpoti M. ; Rotz, C. Alan ; Kleinman, Peter J.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Our objective was to characterize dairy farming strategies in Pennsylvania to provide baseline data for modeling and assessing economic and environmental impacts of the industry. The USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data were used to characterize management practices for 5 dairy farm strategies and 4 herd size categories. Production strategies were confinement, semi-confinement, organic, management intensive rotational grazing, and Amish (use of draft animals with no use of electricity or mobile, powered equipment). Cattle breed and homegrown and purchased feed type and quantity differed significantly among the 5 strategies, whereas housing and manure management varied with herd size. Solid manure handling was used on 41% of farms, consistent with small herd sizes and wide use of tiestall housing (34% of farms). Confinement dairy farms maintained more cows with greater milk production per cow and had more crop area per cow with less reliance on purchased feeds than the weighted average dairy farm. These farms received the lowest net return per unit of milk, which is consistent with a reduction in the number of small confinement farms from the year 2000 to 2010. Although organic dairy producers had 37% greater variable costs, primarily from the high cost of organic feeds, these farms received the greatest return per unit of milk sold through a 51% greater milk price received. Management practices found on Pennsylvania dairy farms around the year 2010 are documented to support further assessment of production practices and sustainability of the industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2590-2865</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15232/aas.2018-01833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural Resource Management Survey ; animal management ; ARMS ; dairy feeds ; nutrient management</subject><ispartof>Applied Animal Science, 2019-06, Vol.35 (3), p.325-338</ispartof><rights>2019 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590286519300552$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holly, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Kpoti M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotz, C. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, Peter J.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farmsUSDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer</title><title>Applied Animal Science</title><description>Our objective was to characterize dairy farming strategies in Pennsylvania to provide baseline data for modeling and assessing economic and environmental impacts of the industry. The USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data were used to characterize management practices for 5 dairy farm strategies and 4 herd size categories. Production strategies were confinement, semi-confinement, organic, management intensive rotational grazing, and Amish (use of draft animals with no use of electricity or mobile, powered equipment). Cattle breed and homegrown and purchased feed type and quantity differed significantly among the 5 strategies, whereas housing and manure management varied with herd size. Solid manure handling was used on 41% of farms, consistent with small herd sizes and wide use of tiestall housing (34% of farms). Confinement dairy farms maintained more cows with greater milk production per cow and had more crop area per cow with less reliance on purchased feeds than the weighted average dairy farm. These farms received the lowest net return per unit of milk, which is consistent with a reduction in the number of small confinement farms from the year 2000 to 2010. Although organic dairy producers had 37% greater variable costs, primarily from the high cost of organic feeds, these farms received the greatest return per unit of milk sold through a 51% greater milk price received. Management practices found on Pennsylvania dairy farms around the year 2010 are documented to support further assessment of production practices and sustainability of the industry.</description><subject>Agricultural Resource Management Survey</subject><subject>animal management</subject><subject>ARMS</subject><subject>dairy feeds</subject><subject>nutrient management</subject><issn>2590-2865</issn><issn>2590-2865</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqlj09LxDAUxIO44KJ79vq-QNc0tdIexT94EYTVc3gkr7tP2qTmZQv99tbFg3cPw8wwzOGn1HWpt2VtKnODKFujy6ZYVFVnam3qVhemuavP_-QLtRH51FqbRt82pl2rwysG3NNAIYM7YEKXKbFkdgKxgzcKQeZ-wsAIHjnN0GEa5GP3eA8sgAHo64g9xHGMKR8D5xnGFCf2lJbVAw1jH2dKV2rVYS-0-fVL1T4_vT-8FLSUiSlZcUzBkedELlsf2ZbanujsQmd_6OyJrvrP9xsES15x</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Holly, Michael A.</creator><creator>Gunn, Kpoti M.</creator><creator>Rotz, C. Alan</creator><creator>Kleinman, Peter J.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farmsUSDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer</title><author>Holly, Michael A. ; Gunn, Kpoti M. ; Rotz, C. Alan ; Kleinman, Peter J.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_15232_aas_2018_018333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural Resource Management Survey</topic><topic>animal management</topic><topic>ARMS</topic><topic>dairy feeds</topic><topic>nutrient management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holly, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gunn, Kpoti M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotz, C. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, Peter J.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holly, Michael A.</au><au>Gunn, Kpoti M.</au><au>Rotz, C. Alan</au><au>Kleinman, Peter J.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farmsUSDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer</atitle><jtitle>Applied Animal Science</jtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>325-338</pages><issn>2590-2865</issn><eissn>2590-2865</eissn><abstract>Our objective was to characterize dairy farming strategies in Pennsylvania to provide baseline data for modeling and assessing economic and environmental impacts of the industry. The USDA’s Agricultural Resource Management Survey (ARMS) data were used to characterize management practices for 5 dairy farm strategies and 4 herd size categories. Production strategies were confinement, semi-confinement, organic, management intensive rotational grazing, and Amish (use of draft animals with no use of electricity or mobile, powered equipment). Cattle breed and homegrown and purchased feed type and quantity differed significantly among the 5 strategies, whereas housing and manure management varied with herd size. Solid manure handling was used on 41% of farms, consistent with small herd sizes and wide use of tiestall housing (34% of farms). Confinement dairy farms maintained more cows with greater milk production per cow and had more crop area per cow with less reliance on purchased feeds than the weighted average dairy farm. These farms received the lowest net return per unit of milk, which is consistent with a reduction in the number of small confinement farms from the year 2000 to 2010. Although organic dairy producers had 37% greater variable costs, primarily from the high cost of organic feeds, these farms received the greatest return per unit of milk sold through a 51% greater milk price received. Management practices found on Pennsylvania dairy farms around the year 2010 are documented to support further assessment of production practices and sustainability of the industry.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.15232/aas.2018-01833</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2590-2865
ispartof Applied Animal Science, 2019-06, Vol.35 (3), p.325-338
issn 2590-2865
2590-2865
language eng
recordid cdi_elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_15232_aas_2018_01833
source ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects Agricultural Resource Management Survey
animal management
ARMS
dairy feeds
nutrient management
title Management characteristics of Pennsylvania dairy farmsUSDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A05%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20characteristics%20of%20Pennsylvania%20dairy%20farmsUSDA%20is%20an%20equal%20opportunity%20provider%20and%20employer&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Animal%20Science&rft.au=Holly,%20Michael%20A.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=325-338&rft.issn=2590-2865&rft.eissn=2590-2865&rft_id=info:doi/10.15232/aas.2018-01833&rft_dat=%3Celsevier%3ES2590286519300552%3C/elsevier%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_15232_aas_2018_018333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true