Loading…

Ovulation timing and conception risk after automated activity monitoring in lactating dairy cows1

Using 1 market-available activity monitor, 3 experiments were conducted in dairy cows to determine timing of ovulation, compare within-herd conception risk of cows inseminated based on activity monitors versus timed artificial insemination (AI), and determine conception risk of cows inseminated at v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2014-07, Vol.97 (7), p.4296-4308
Main Authors: Stevenson, J.S., Hill, S.L., Nebel, R.L., DeJarnette, J.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Using 1 market-available activity monitor, 3 experiments were conducted in dairy cows to determine timing of ovulation, compare within-herd conception risk of cows inseminated based on activity monitors versus timed artificial insemination (AI), and determine conception risk of cows inseminated at various intervals after achieving an activity threshold. In experiment 1, ovaries were scanned every 3h by transrectal ultrasonography to determine the time of ovulation beginning 14±0.5h after the achieved activity threshold (n=132) or first standing event (n=59), or both (n=59). Progesterone at the first ovarian scan (0.1±0.01ng/mL) and ovarian structures [1 or 2 preovulatory-sized follicles (16.5±0.2mm)] confirmed that 88.6% of cows identified by activity were in estrus. The remaining 15 cows (11.4%) with a corpus luteum and elevated progesterone concentration (5.3±0.5ng/mL) were classified as false positives. The average interval from first standing event to ovulation (n=59) differed slightly from the interval after the achieved threshold (26.4±0.7 vs. 24.6±0.7h, respectively). In 97 cows fitted with activity monitors, that interval was 25.7±0.4h. In experiment 2, the conception risk in 394 cows in 1 herd fitted with activity monitors was compared with that of 413 cows submitted to a timed AI program through 3 AI services. Days to first AI were reduced in cows fitted with activity monitors, and conception risk after activity threshold was less than that for timed AI at first service because of differing days in milk at first AI. Both median and mean days to pregnancy, however, were reduced in activity-group cows by 10 and 24d, respectively, compared with timed AI cows. In experiment 3, 4,019 cows in 19 herds were inseminated after achieving the activity threshold. Conception risk was determined for cows inseminated at various intervals after the achieved activity threshold. A curvilinear conception risk curve peaked at 47.9% for primiparous cows inseminated between 13 and 16h, whereas conception risk in multiparous cows was steady at 34% through 12h and decreased thereafter. These experiments demonstrate that time of ovulation after activity threshold closely resembles the time of ovulation after first standing estrus. Time of insemination up to 12h after the activity threshold produced similar conception risks for multiparous cows, whereas intervals shorter than 13 and greater than 16h in primiparous cows seemed to compromise their conception risk. Although
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.2013-7873