Loading…
Auditory-evoked potentials as a tool for follow-up
Aim of the study In this study, we assessed the value of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) as objective measurable reproducible tests for the follow-up of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) in response to pharmacologic and rehabilitative therapy. Patients and methods This study included 30 female FM pa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation 2013, Vol.40 (4), p.224-233 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim of the study
In this study, we assessed the value of auditory-evoked potentials (AEPs) as objective
measurable reproducible tests for the follow-up of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) in response
to pharmacologic and rehabilitative therapy.
Patients and methods
This study included 30 female FM patients and 10 age-matched female controls. All
participants underwent a clinical examination, a psychiatric and functional assessment (sleep
score, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and
measurement of AEPs elicited by tones of increasing intensity (60, 70, 80, and 90 dB) known
as late cortical responses and cognitive auditory potentials (P300). Patients were subdivided
into three equal groups. Group 1 received pregabalin, group 2 received fluoxetine, and group
3 included patients who performed a graded aerobic exercise program. Assessment was
repeated at the end of the 8-week treatment period.
Results
Patients had significantly shorter N1 latencies at 60 and 70 dB, significantly shorter P2 latencies
at all the studied intensities, and significantly higher N1P2 amplitudes at 90 dB.There was a
statistically significant decrease in amplitude and a significant increase in P300 latency when
compared with controls. Changes in AEP values before and after treatment were closely
associated with the changes in psychiatric and functional assessment parameters.
Conclusion
Improvement in the clinical assessment of the different symptoms of FM goes hand in hand
with the improvement in the late cortical and cognitive components of AEPs, which provides
evidence of the value of AEP as a simple, noninvasive, objective, and reproducible follow-up
tool for assessment of hypervigilance and cognitive function in FM patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1110-161X 2090-3235 |