Defining Boundaries for Ecosystem-Based Management: A Multispecies Case Study of Marine Connectivity across the Hawaiian Archipelago

• Published in: Journal of marine sciences (London) 2011, Vol.2011 (2011), p.1-13
• Main Authors: Gaither, Michelle R., Puritz, Jonathan B., Schultz, Jennifer K., Skillings, Derek J., Timmers, Molly A., Bowen, Brian W., Faucci, Anuschka, Eble, Jeff A., Daly-Engel, Toby S., Concepcion, Gregory T., Bird, Christopher E., Baums, Iliana B., Andrews, Kimberly R., Toonen, Robert J., Iacchei, Matthew
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 2633-4666; 2633-4674
• DOI: 10.1155/2011/460173

Determining the geographic scale at which to apply ecosystem-based management (EBM) has proven to be an obstacle for many marine conservation programs. Generalizations based on geographic proximity, taxonomy, or life history characteristics provide little predictive power in determining overall patterns of connectivity, and therefore offer little in terms of delineating boundaries for marine spatial management areas. Here, we provide a case study of 27 taxonomically and ecologically diverse species (including reef fishes, marine mammals, gastropods, echinoderms, cnidarians, crustaceans, and an elasmobranch) that reveal four concordant barriers to dispersal within the Hawaiian Archipelago which are not detected in single-species exemplar studies. We contend that this multispecies approach to determine concordant patterns of connectivity is an objective and logical way in which to define the minimum number of management units and that EBM in the Hawaiian Archipelago requires at least five spatially managed regions.