Loading…

A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics

Purpose - To design a high power density machine, an automatic design method is proposed. Hopefully, automatic design method uses only the requirements (torque and speed) and the information about sources (voltage and current).Design methodology approach - To calculate the volume, a necessary flux d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Compel 2006-04, Vol.25 (2), p.496-509
Main Authors: Akatsu, K., Wakui, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33
container_end_page 509
container_issue 2
container_start_page 496
container_title Compel
container_volume 25
creator Akatsu, K.
Wakui, S.
description Purpose - To design a high power density machine, an automatic design method is proposed. Hopefully, automatic design method uses only the requirements (torque and speed) and the information about sources (voltage and current).Design methodology approach - To calculate the volume, a necessary flux density and an inductance are calculated by the permeance method. All mechanical parameters, stator diameter, teeth width, turn number and so on, realize the necessary flux density and an inductance, and these parameters are expressed as a function of a rotor diameter. By using both conditions of current density and copper loss, a rotor diameter which realizes the minimum volume can be obtained.Findings - As a result of an optimum design, 50 kW SPMSM is realized only into 2[L] spaces, which copper loss is only 500[W], 1 percent of the maximum output. Moreover, 50 kW axial flux type machine is realized only into 1.3[L] spaces. Accurate comparison is possible by only optimum designs because these have the solutions of the same conditions. In a comparison result, a volume of the axial flux machine is less than that of the radial flux machine, because the radial flux type cannot utilize the large rotor diameter. Thus the axial flux type motor is suitable to the high torque machine.Research limitations implications - In this research, the length of the coil end and the iron loss, are ignored, because an axial length of stator is much longer than a coil end especially for the high power motor, and the iron loss estimation has not been established.Practical implications - By using this method, it is possible to perform the automatic design. If a designer inputs only the requested torque, speed and device information, an automatic calculation will be done, and a designer can automatically get a motor structure.Originality value - Although some papers can calculate the mechanical parameters which realize only torque, all requirements, torque, speed and power are satisfied in this paper. In addition, an optimum point of the volume is theoretically obtained. In industrial applications, because the power range is very important, especially for electric vehicles and so on, this paper provides more compact and more powerful machines.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/03321640610649159
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_03321640610649159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35111200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EEkvhB3CzOHAi1B-xEx-rigJtgUoUcbQce8ymxHFqO2L77_FqEQeKBHOZkeZ5Z_TOIPSckteUkv6YcM6obImkRLaKCvUAbRgRbSMkkQ_RZt9vKqAeoyc535AaSpAN2p1gG8Ni0pjjjAcoPwBmbHajmbCZHU7G7Us_rTt89QGHWGLCwx2OSxnDGrCDPH6bcYCyjQ77FAMuW8AJbtcxgcNxLcta8MdrbLcmGVugbiqjzU_RI2-mDM9-5SP05ezN9em75vLT2_enJ5eNbQUpDZMDU1YqaQYifQ_G7M0NvfLM0mGoDh0ob4BSPljJuo72rKtmAbj0xHF-hF4e5i4p3q6Qiw5jtjBNZoa4Zs0FpZQR8k-Q9VRw2bcVfPEHeBPXNFcTmhGlGKe8rxA9QDbFnBN4vaQxmHSnKdH7j-l7H6ua5qCpF4Ldb4FJ37XseCd0-5Xpq16ct5_7C31ReXLgIUAyk_uvFa_-LrmH6sV5_hNlfrNH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209923138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics</title><source>ABI/INFORM Collection</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Akatsu, K. ; Wakui, S.</creator><contributor>Wiak, S. ; Wiak, S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Akatsu, K. ; Wakui, S. ; Wiak, S. ; Wiak, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - To design a high power density machine, an automatic design method is proposed. Hopefully, automatic design method uses only the requirements (torque and speed) and the information about sources (voltage and current).Design methodology approach - To calculate the volume, a necessary flux density and an inductance are calculated by the permeance method. All mechanical parameters, stator diameter, teeth width, turn number and so on, realize the necessary flux density and an inductance, and these parameters are expressed as a function of a rotor diameter. By using both conditions of current density and copper loss, a rotor diameter which realizes the minimum volume can be obtained.Findings - As a result of an optimum design, 50 kW SPMSM is realized only into 2[L] spaces, which copper loss is only 500[W], 1 percent of the maximum output. Moreover, 50 kW axial flux type machine is realized only into 1.3[L] spaces. Accurate comparison is possible by only optimum designs because these have the solutions of the same conditions. In a comparison result, a volume of the axial flux machine is less than that of the radial flux machine, because the radial flux type cannot utilize the large rotor diameter. Thus the axial flux type motor is suitable to the high torque machine.Research limitations implications - In this research, the length of the coil end and the iron loss, are ignored, because an axial length of stator is much longer than a coil end especially for the high power motor, and the iron loss estimation has not been established.Practical implications - By using this method, it is possible to perform the automatic design. If a designer inputs only the requested torque, speed and device information, an automatic calculation will be done, and a designer can automatically get a motor structure.Originality value - Although some papers can calculate the mechanical parameters which realize only torque, all requirements, torque, speed and power are satisfied in this paper. In addition, an optimum point of the volume is theoretically obtained. In industrial applications, because the power range is very important, especially for electric vehicles and so on, this paper provides more compact and more powerful machines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0332-1649</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/03321640610649159</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CODUDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Comparative studies ; Design optimization ; Design techniques ; Finite element analysis ; Flux ; Magnetic devices ; Magnetism ; Mechanical properties ; Motors ; Optimum design</subject><ispartof>Compel, 2006-04, Vol.25 (2), p.496-509</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing, Limited 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/209923138/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/209923138?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,27923,27924,36059,36060,44362,74666</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wiak, S.</contributor><contributor>Wiak, S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Akatsu, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakui, S.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics</title><title>Compel</title><description>Purpose - To design a high power density machine, an automatic design method is proposed. Hopefully, automatic design method uses only the requirements (torque and speed) and the information about sources (voltage and current).Design methodology approach - To calculate the volume, a necessary flux density and an inductance are calculated by the permeance method. All mechanical parameters, stator diameter, teeth width, turn number and so on, realize the necessary flux density and an inductance, and these parameters are expressed as a function of a rotor diameter. By using both conditions of current density and copper loss, a rotor diameter which realizes the minimum volume can be obtained.Findings - As a result of an optimum design, 50 kW SPMSM is realized only into 2[L] spaces, which copper loss is only 500[W], 1 percent of the maximum output. Moreover, 50 kW axial flux type machine is realized only into 1.3[L] spaces. Accurate comparison is possible by only optimum designs because these have the solutions of the same conditions. In a comparison result, a volume of the axial flux machine is less than that of the radial flux machine, because the radial flux type cannot utilize the large rotor diameter. Thus the axial flux type motor is suitable to the high torque machine.Research limitations implications - In this research, the length of the coil end and the iron loss, are ignored, because an axial length of stator is much longer than a coil end especially for the high power motor, and the iron loss estimation has not been established.Practical implications - By using this method, it is possible to perform the automatic design. If a designer inputs only the requested torque, speed and device information, an automatic calculation will be done, and a designer can automatically get a motor structure.Originality value - Although some papers can calculate the mechanical parameters which realize only torque, all requirements, torque, speed and power are satisfied in this paper. In addition, an optimum point of the volume is theoretically obtained. In industrial applications, because the power range is very important, especially for electric vehicles and so on, this paper provides more compact and more powerful machines.</description><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Design techniques</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Magnetic devices</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Motors</subject><subject>Optimum design</subject><issn>0332-1649</issn><issn>2054-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EEkvhB3CzOHAi1B-xEx-rigJtgUoUcbQce8ymxHFqO2L77_FqEQeKBHOZkeZ5Z_TOIPSckteUkv6YcM6obImkRLaKCvUAbRgRbSMkkQ_RZt9vKqAeoyc535AaSpAN2p1gG8Ni0pjjjAcoPwBmbHajmbCZHU7G7Us_rTt89QGHWGLCwx2OSxnDGrCDPH6bcYCyjQ77FAMuW8AJbtcxgcNxLcta8MdrbLcmGVugbiqjzU_RI2-mDM9-5SP05ezN9em75vLT2_enJ5eNbQUpDZMDU1YqaQYifQ_G7M0NvfLM0mGoDh0ob4BSPljJuo72rKtmAbj0xHF-hF4e5i4p3q6Qiw5jtjBNZoa4Zs0FpZQR8k-Q9VRw2bcVfPEHeBPXNFcTmhGlGKe8rxA9QDbFnBN4vaQxmHSnKdH7j-l7H6ua5qCpF4Ldb4FJ37XseCd0-5Xpq16ct5_7C31ReXLgIUAyk_uvFa_-LrmH6sV5_hNlfrNH</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Akatsu, K.</creator><creator>Wakui, S.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics</title><author>Akatsu, K. ; Wakui, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Design techniques</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Magnetic devices</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Motors</topic><topic>Optimum design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akatsu, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wakui, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Compel</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akatsu, K.</au><au>Wakui, S.</au><au>Wiak, S.</au><au>Wiak, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Compel</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>496</spage><epage>509</epage><pages>496-509</pages><issn>0332-1649</issn><eissn>2054-5606</eissn><coden>CODUDU</coden><abstract>Purpose - To design a high power density machine, an automatic design method is proposed. Hopefully, automatic design method uses only the requirements (torque and speed) and the information about sources (voltage and current).Design methodology approach - To calculate the volume, a necessary flux density and an inductance are calculated by the permeance method. All mechanical parameters, stator diameter, teeth width, turn number and so on, realize the necessary flux density and an inductance, and these parameters are expressed as a function of a rotor diameter. By using both conditions of current density and copper loss, a rotor diameter which realizes the minimum volume can be obtained.Findings - As a result of an optimum design, 50 kW SPMSM is realized only into 2[L] spaces, which copper loss is only 500[W], 1 percent of the maximum output. Moreover, 50 kW axial flux type machine is realized only into 1.3[L] spaces. Accurate comparison is possible by only optimum designs because these have the solutions of the same conditions. In a comparison result, a volume of the axial flux machine is less than that of the radial flux machine, because the radial flux type cannot utilize the large rotor diameter. Thus the axial flux type motor is suitable to the high torque machine.Research limitations implications - In this research, the length of the coil end and the iron loss, are ignored, because an axial length of stator is much longer than a coil end especially for the high power motor, and the iron loss estimation has not been established.Practical implications - By using this method, it is possible to perform the automatic design. If a designer inputs only the requested torque, speed and device information, an automatic calculation will be done, and a designer can automatically get a motor structure.Originality value - Although some papers can calculate the mechanical parameters which realize only torque, all requirements, torque, speed and power are satisfied in this paper. In addition, an optimum point of the volume is theoretically obtained. In industrial applications, because the power range is very important, especially for electric vehicles and so on, this paper provides more compact and more powerful machines.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/03321640610649159</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0332-1649
ispartof Compel, 2006-04, Vol.25 (2), p.496-509
issn 0332-1649
2054-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_03321640610649159
source ABI/INFORM Collection; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Comparative studies
Design optimization
Design techniques
Finite element analysis
Flux
Magnetic devices
Magnetism
Mechanical properties
Motors
Optimum design
title A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20axial%20and%20radial%20flux%20PM%20motor%20by%20optimum%20design%20method%20from%20the%20required%20output%20NT%20characteristics&rft.jtitle=Compel&rft.au=Akatsu,%20K.&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=496&rft.epage=509&rft.pages=496-509&rft.issn=0332-1649&rft.eissn=2054-5606&rft.coden=CODUDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/03321640610649159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E35111200%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-26b29c696ab06f8eaa9159b89f2c1bb054de9fae113bc62771827033ee36f0d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209923138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true