Loading…

Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design

Purpose - Significant productivity improvements have been experienced in business by information technology (IT) implementations in latest decades. However, IT project selection is an important problem because a significant part of IT expenditure is wasted and almost half of IT projects realize no n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of enterprise information management 2005-06, Vol.18 (3), p.275-288
Main Authors: Kulak, Osman, Kahraman, Cengiz, Öztay i, Ba ar, Tanya, Mehmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603
container_end_page 288
container_issue 3
container_start_page 275
container_title Journal of enterprise information management
container_volume 18
creator Kulak, Osman
Kahraman, Cengiz
Öztay i, Ba ar
Tanya, Mehmet
description Purpose - Significant productivity improvements have been experienced in business by information technology (IT) implementations in latest decades. However, IT project selection is an important problem because a significant part of IT expenditure is wasted and almost half of IT projects realize no net benefits. Since axiomatic design (AD) has the characteristics of multi-attribute evaluation, it is proposed for multi-attribute comparison of information technology systems (ITS).Design methodology approach - The comparison of ITS is made for the cases of both complete and incomplete information. The crisp AD approach for complete information and the fuzzy AD approach for incomplete information are developed. The numerical applications of both crisp and fuzzy AD approaches in the comparison of ITS are also given.Findings - The AD approach takes into account the design range of each criterion, determined by the designer. Thus, the alternative providing the design ranges is selected in AD approach while the alternative meeting the criteria at their best levels is selected in many other methods. This opportunity is not possible when many other existing methods such as AHP, fuzzy AHP, and scoring models are used. The AD approach also differs from many other existing methods from the point of the rejection of an alternative when it does not meet the design range of any criterion.Research limitations implications - For future research, it is suggested that researchers study weighted crisp and fuzzy AD approaches.Originality value - This paper is the first which develops the fuzzy AD approach and uses it in the comparison of ITS.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/17410390510591978
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_17410390510591978</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28391673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLAzEQgBdRsD5-gLfFg15czeSxSY5SfIHixZ6XNJvUlO2mJlmw_npT6qni4zQD833zYIriBNAlABJXwCkgIhEDxCRILnaKEXAmKk6R3F3nFKoMiP3iIMY5QlgKgFExeRq65CqVUnDTIZnS9daHhUrO92Uy-rX3nZ-tymXwc6NTGU2Xw7o4RNfPSjt8fKxK9e782tFla6Kb9UfFnlVdNMdf8bCY3N68jO-rx-e7h_H1Y6UppalqqWB5D1bzqWlbsGyab7EWC2VBAGkZIaimU8VqsIJqqhlFnICmQhCOa0QOi_NN37ze22BiahYuatN1qjd-iA2nBEuMKM_k2a8klkQInIf-CQoioeYkg6db4NwPoc_nNhgjRAinMkOwgXTwMQZjm2VwCxVWDaBm_bjm2-OygzaOWZiguvZfysUPyjbaLFtLPgGsOaW_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220033749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kulak, Osman ; Kahraman, Cengiz ; Öztay i, Ba ar ; Tanya, Mehmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Kulak, Osman ; Kahraman, Cengiz ; Öztay i, Ba ar ; Tanya, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - Significant productivity improvements have been experienced in business by information technology (IT) implementations in latest decades. However, IT project selection is an important problem because a significant part of IT expenditure is wasted and almost half of IT projects realize no net benefits. Since axiomatic design (AD) has the characteristics of multi-attribute evaluation, it is proposed for multi-attribute comparison of information technology systems (ITS).Design methodology approach - The comparison of ITS is made for the cases of both complete and incomplete information. The crisp AD approach for complete information and the fuzzy AD approach for incomplete information are developed. The numerical applications of both crisp and fuzzy AD approaches in the comparison of ITS are also given.Findings - The AD approach takes into account the design range of each criterion, determined by the designer. Thus, the alternative providing the design ranges is selected in AD approach while the alternative meeting the criteria at their best levels is selected in many other methods. This opportunity is not possible when many other existing methods such as AHP, fuzzy AHP, and scoring models are used. The AD approach also differs from many other existing methods from the point of the rejection of an alternative when it does not meet the design range of any criterion.Research limitations implications - For future research, it is suggested that researchers study weighted crisp and fuzzy AD approaches.Originality value - This paper is the first which develops the fuzzy AD approach and uses it in the comparison of ITS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-0398</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/17410390510591978</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LINMEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Decision making models ; Design ; Expenditures ; Fuzzy logic ; Fuzzy sets ; Information technology ; Manufacturing ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Product development ; Productivity ; Project evaluation ; Set theory ; Software ; Systems design ; User services</subject><ispartof>Journal of enterprise information management, 2005-06, Vol.18 (3), p.275-288</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Copyright MCB UP Limited (MCB) 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/220033749?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21381,21394,27305,27924,27925,33611,33612,33906,33907,34135,36060,36061,43733,43892,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kulak, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztay i, Ba ar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanya, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design</title><title>Journal of enterprise information management</title><description>Purpose - Significant productivity improvements have been experienced in business by information technology (IT) implementations in latest decades. However, IT project selection is an important problem because a significant part of IT expenditure is wasted and almost half of IT projects realize no net benefits. Since axiomatic design (AD) has the characteristics of multi-attribute evaluation, it is proposed for multi-attribute comparison of information technology systems (ITS).Design methodology approach - The comparison of ITS is made for the cases of both complete and incomplete information. The crisp AD approach for complete information and the fuzzy AD approach for incomplete information are developed. The numerical applications of both crisp and fuzzy AD approaches in the comparison of ITS are also given.Findings - The AD approach takes into account the design range of each criterion, determined by the designer. Thus, the alternative providing the design ranges is selected in AD approach while the alternative meeting the criteria at their best levels is selected in many other methods. This opportunity is not possible when many other existing methods such as AHP, fuzzy AHP, and scoring models are used. The AD approach also differs from many other existing methods from the point of the rejection of an alternative when it does not meet the design range of any criterion.Research limitations implications - For future research, it is suggested that researchers study weighted crisp and fuzzy AD approaches.Originality value - This paper is the first which develops the fuzzy AD approach and uses it in the comparison of ITS.</description><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Project evaluation</subject><subject>Set theory</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>User services</subject><issn>1741-0398</issn><issn>1758-7409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLAzEQgBdRsD5-gLfFg15czeSxSY5SfIHixZ6XNJvUlO2mJlmw_npT6qni4zQD833zYIriBNAlABJXwCkgIhEDxCRILnaKEXAmKk6R3F3nFKoMiP3iIMY5QlgKgFExeRq65CqVUnDTIZnS9daHhUrO92Uy-rX3nZ-tymXwc6NTGU2Xw7o4RNfPSjt8fKxK9e782tFla6Kb9UfFnlVdNMdf8bCY3N68jO-rx-e7h_H1Y6UppalqqWB5D1bzqWlbsGyab7EWC2VBAGkZIaimU8VqsIJqqhlFnICmQhCOa0QOi_NN37ze22BiahYuatN1qjd-iA2nBEuMKM_k2a8klkQInIf-CQoioeYkg6db4NwPoc_nNhgjRAinMkOwgXTwMQZjm2VwCxVWDaBm_bjm2-OygzaOWZiguvZfysUPyjbaLFtLPgGsOaW_</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Kulak, Osman</creator><creator>Kahraman, Cengiz</creator><creator>Öztay i, Ba ar</creator><creator>Tanya, Mehmet</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design</title><author>Kulak, Osman ; Kahraman, Cengiz ; Öztay i, Ba ar ; Tanya, Mehmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Project evaluation</topic><topic>Set theory</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>User services</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kulak, Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahraman, Cengiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztay i, Ba ar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanya, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of enterprise information management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kulak, Osman</au><au>Kahraman, Cengiz</au><au>Öztay i, Ba ar</au><au>Tanya, Mehmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of enterprise information management</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>275</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>275-288</pages><issn>1741-0398</issn><eissn>1758-7409</eissn><coden>LINMEC</coden><abstract>Purpose - Significant productivity improvements have been experienced in business by information technology (IT) implementations in latest decades. However, IT project selection is an important problem because a significant part of IT expenditure is wasted and almost half of IT projects realize no net benefits. Since axiomatic design (AD) has the characteristics of multi-attribute evaluation, it is proposed for multi-attribute comparison of information technology systems (ITS).Design methodology approach - The comparison of ITS is made for the cases of both complete and incomplete information. The crisp AD approach for complete information and the fuzzy AD approach for incomplete information are developed. The numerical applications of both crisp and fuzzy AD approaches in the comparison of ITS are also given.Findings - The AD approach takes into account the design range of each criterion, determined by the designer. Thus, the alternative providing the design ranges is selected in AD approach while the alternative meeting the criteria at their best levels is selected in many other methods. This opportunity is not possible when many other existing methods such as AHP, fuzzy AHP, and scoring models are used. The AD approach also differs from many other existing methods from the point of the rejection of an alternative when it does not meet the design range of any criterion.Research limitations implications - For future research, it is suggested that researchers study weighted crisp and fuzzy AD approaches.Originality value - This paper is the first which develops the fuzzy AD approach and uses it in the comparison of ITS.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/17410390510591978</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1741-0398
ispartof Journal of enterprise information management, 2005-06, Vol.18 (3), p.275-288
issn 1741-0398
1758-7409
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_17410390510591978
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Library & Information Science Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Decision making models
Design
Expenditures
Fuzzy logic
Fuzzy sets
Information technology
Manufacturing
Multiple criteria decision making
Product development
Productivity
Project evaluation
Set theory
Software
Systems design
User services
title Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A10%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-attribute%20information%20technology%20project%20selection%20using%20fuzzy%20axiomatic%20design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20enterprise%20information%20management&rft.au=Kulak,%20Osman&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=275&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=275-288&rft.issn=1741-0398&rft.eissn=1758-7409&rft.coden=LINMEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/17410390510591978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E28391673%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-d485298567bedd1f5b110ff28af1813d533064ba561f84c4c540731c488372603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220033749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true