When the mountain broke: disaster governance in Sierra Leone

• Published in: Disaster prevention and management 2021-12, Vol.30 (6), p.14-25
• Main Authors: Melis, Samantha, Hilhorst, Dorothea
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Civil war; Decentralization; Disaster management; Disasters; Displaced persons; Ebola virus; Fieldwork; Floods; Governance; Humanitarianism; Landslides; Legitimacy; Mountains; Political leadership; Postcolonialism; Society; State power
• ISSN: 0965-3562; 1758-6100
• DOI: 10.1108/DPM-03-2020-0076

PurposeWhen a major landslide and floods devastated Freetown, Sierra Leone had just overcome the Ebola crisis, which had left its mark on socio-political relations between different disaster response actors. With international disaster response frameworks increasingly shifting to local ownership, the national government was expected to assume a coordinating role. However, in “post-conflict” settings such as Sierra Leone, intra-state and state–society relations are continuously being renegotiated. This study aimed to uncover the complexities of state-led disaster response in hybrid governance setting at national and community levels in the response to the 2017 landslide and floods.Design/methodology/approachDuring the four months of fieldwork in Freetown in 2017, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with various state, aid and societal actors were conducted.FindingsThe findings show that a response to policy building on the idea of a uniform state response did not take into account intra-state power politics or the complexity of Sierra Leone's hybrid governance.Practical implicationsThis paper argues for a more nuanced debate in humanitarian governance and practice on the localisation of aid in post-conflict and fragile settings.Originality/valueThe study's findings contribute to the literature on the disaster–conflict nexus, identifying paradoxes of localised disaster response in an environment with strong national–local tensions. The study highlights intra-local state dynamics that are usually overlooked but have a great impact on the legitimacy of different state authorities in disaster response.