Casting an architectural lens on disaster reconstruction

• Published in: Disaster prevention and management 2013-01, Vol.22 (5), p.480-490
• Main Author: Lee, Alexandra-Jayeun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Architects; Architecture; Attitudes; Civil society; Communities; Decision making; Design; Designers; Disaster recovery; Disaster risk management; Disaster studies; Disasters; Earthquake design; Earthquakes; Empowerment; Environmental management; Fieldwork; Green buildings; Grounded theory; Humanitarianism; Hurricanes; Interviews; Lenses; Professionals; Public policy & environmental management; Reconstruction; Renewable resources; Research methodology; Seismic activity; Seismic phenomena; Society; Sociology; Studies
• ISSN: 0965-3562; 1758-6100
• DOI: 10.1108/DPM-10-2013-0178

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to serve two main purposes: first, casting an architectural lens over the disaster context propagates deeper understanding of affected communities who depend on, and can benefit from, better understanding of rebuilding processes; second, by reframing architecture as a “social equaliser” we can make sustainable buildings more accessible to a society that is undergoing massive post-disaster change. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents the findings of my doctoral research on the role of architects in humanitarian endeavours. Based on empirical research and fieldwork conducted on professional responses to three recent disasters: the 2010 Canterbury earthquake; the 2010 Haiti earthquake; and the 2004 Hurricane Katrina, the author has used Horst Rittel's design methods paradigm as a conceptual framework to reconstruct and re-evaluate our understanding of disasters. Drawing from 49 semi-structured interviews with key architectural-design practitioners in the three case sites, this study proposes a re-conceptualisation of urban reconstruction that prioritises community empowerment through design processes rather than through architectural symbolism. Findings – Drawing from 49 semi-structured interviews with key architectural-design practitioners in the three case sites, this study proposes a re-conceptualisation of urban reconstruction that prioritises community empowerment through design processes rather than through architectural symbolism. Practical implications – This study is an attempt to reconcile the contentious views that exist across multiple sectors by offering design as an ultimately renewable resource and a source of community empowerment. Originality/value – The main value proposition of this research paper is that, while many studies acknowledge disasters as truly “wicked problems” (resistant to resolution and riddled with complexities), few attempts to integrate the multi-disciplinary perspectives that can advance our understanding of disasters.