Loading…
Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop a reliable and valid measurement scale of employee engagement that can be used in human resources departments in any industry field. Design/methodology/approach This study used the measurement development process with three steps. The first step was to...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of training and development 2022-05, Vol.46 (5/6), p.585-606 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-2dd30de5a27a4118aed9240c80ccd3decda182b77e3a364005c12cee1c0ced9a3 |
container_end_page | 606 |
container_issue | 5/6 |
container_start_page | 585 |
container_title | European journal of training and development |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | So, Byung Han Kim, Ji Hyun Ro, Yun Jeong Song, Ji Hoon |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop a reliable and valid measurement scale of employee engagement that can be used in human resources departments in any industry field.
Design/methodology/approach
This study used the measurement development process with three steps. The first step was to generate items for measuring employee engagement. For this reason, the authors proposed an integrated conceptual model based on the results of a literature review and justify the concepts from self-determination theory and person-environment fit theory as the theoretical foundation. The second step was to determine the types of questions suitable for measurement, examining the content validity. Content validity was conducted two times by the group, academic experts and business practitioners. The last step was to examine the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multi-group analysis and reliability with 352 survey responses from the South Korean business context.
Findings
Findings of the measurement scale development procedure, i.e. employee engagement, should be managed in a balanced manner in all dimensions, as it is composed of four dimensions (person engagement, work engagement, organization engagement and relation engagement) and 16 sub-factors. Additionally, organization engagement was the major factor among the four dimensions of employee engagement with the highest variance explanation. From the statistical standpoint, the employee engagement scale (EES) is possible to use in any industry field because it demonstrated not only content validity and internal consistency reliability but also the three steps of factor analysis (EFA, CFA and multi-group analysis).
Research limitations/implications
This survey was conducted with an assistant manager located in Korea. Therefore, it will be necessary to analyze both leader and employee engagement for those who live in foreign countries. The EES is useful to leaders and human resource managers because it is applicable to managing engagement levels of employees and fosters customized training programs.
Originality/value
This is the first study to develop measurement tools for employee engagement in South Korea. In addition, most studies demonstrated that individual feeling was valued to drive employee engagement. This research, however, proposes an extended concept of employee engagement for four dimensions (person, work, relation and organization) and emphasizes the important rel |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/EJTD-11-2020-0155 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_EJTD-11-2020-0155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1339020</ericid><sourcerecordid>2668171739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-2dd30de5a27a4118aed9240c80ccd3decda182b77e3a364005c12cee1c0ced9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gAch4Hk1k-xXvUlbP2rBg_W8xGRat-xu1iRb7L83a0tBMJcM8z4zgSeEXAK7AWD57Wy-nEYAEWecRQyS5IQMOIvTaBwap8ca-DkZObdh4eQJQBoPiJ7iFivTls2aSlqjdJ3FGhtPnZIV0pWxFOu2MjtEis1arn_TuwBvZVVq6UvTUOc7vaNlE7pvpvOf9MVYlA1VpvH47S_I2UpWDkeHe0jeH2bLyVO0eH18ntwvIsUh9xHXWjCNieSZjAFyiXrMY6ZyppQWGpWWkPOPLEMhRRozlijgChEUUwGVYkiu93tba746dL7YmM424cmCp2kOGWRiHCjYU8oa5yyuitaWtbS7AljR-yx6n6Eqep9F7zPMXO1n0JbqyM_mIETvOOTskNdoZaX_Xfnni8QP3gGBFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2668171739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>So, Byung Han ; Kim, Ji Hyun ; Ro, Yun Jeong ; Song, Ji Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>So, Byung Han ; Kim, Ji Hyun ; Ro, Yun Jeong ; Song, Ji Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop a reliable and valid measurement scale of employee engagement that can be used in human resources departments in any industry field.
Design/methodology/approach
This study used the measurement development process with three steps. The first step was to generate items for measuring employee engagement. For this reason, the authors proposed an integrated conceptual model based on the results of a literature review and justify the concepts from self-determination theory and person-environment fit theory as the theoretical foundation. The second step was to determine the types of questions suitable for measurement, examining the content validity. Content validity was conducted two times by the group, academic experts and business practitioners. The last step was to examine the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multi-group analysis and reliability with 352 survey responses from the South Korean business context.
Findings
Findings of the measurement scale development procedure, i.e. employee engagement, should be managed in a balanced manner in all dimensions, as it is composed of four dimensions (person engagement, work engagement, organization engagement and relation engagement) and 16 sub-factors. Additionally, organization engagement was the major factor among the four dimensions of employee engagement with the highest variance explanation. From the statistical standpoint, the employee engagement scale (EES) is possible to use in any industry field because it demonstrated not only content validity and internal consistency reliability but also the three steps of factor analysis (EFA, CFA and multi-group analysis).
Research limitations/implications
This survey was conducted with an assistant manager located in Korea. Therefore, it will be necessary to analyze both leader and employee engagement for those who live in foreign countries. The EES is useful to leaders and human resource managers because it is applicable to managing engagement levels of employees and fosters customized training programs.
Originality/value
This is the first study to develop measurement tools for employee engagement in South Korea. In addition, most studies demonstrated that individual feeling was valued to drive employee engagement. This research, however, proposes an extended concept of employee engagement for four dimensions (person, work, relation and organization) and emphasizes the important relationship between individuals and colleagues in an organization. Based on these results, a theoretically integrated model of employee engagement was developed and a practically valid measurement tool for capturing comprehensive domains of employee engagement was proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-9012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-9020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/EJTD-11-2020-0155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Limerick: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Burnout ; Employee Attitudes ; Employee involvement ; Factor Analysis ; Figurative Language ; Foreign Countries ; Human Resources ; Incentives ; Internal public relations ; Job Performance ; Job Satisfaction ; Literature reviews ; Motivation ; Organizational Effectiveness ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Self Management ; Social exchange theory ; Test Construction ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Values</subject><ispartof>European journal of training and development, 2022-05, Vol.46 (5/6), p.585-606</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-2dd30de5a27a4118aed9240c80ccd3decda182b77e3a364005c12cee1c0ced9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1339020$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>So, Byung Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ro, Yun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Ji Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context</title><title>European journal of training and development</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop a reliable and valid measurement scale of employee engagement that can be used in human resources departments in any industry field.
Design/methodology/approach
This study used the measurement development process with three steps. The first step was to generate items for measuring employee engagement. For this reason, the authors proposed an integrated conceptual model based on the results of a literature review and justify the concepts from self-determination theory and person-environment fit theory as the theoretical foundation. The second step was to determine the types of questions suitable for measurement, examining the content validity. Content validity was conducted two times by the group, academic experts and business practitioners. The last step was to examine the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multi-group analysis and reliability with 352 survey responses from the South Korean business context.
Findings
Findings of the measurement scale development procedure, i.e. employee engagement, should be managed in a balanced manner in all dimensions, as it is composed of four dimensions (person engagement, work engagement, organization engagement and relation engagement) and 16 sub-factors. Additionally, organization engagement was the major factor among the four dimensions of employee engagement with the highest variance explanation. From the statistical standpoint, the employee engagement scale (EES) is possible to use in any industry field because it demonstrated not only content validity and internal consistency reliability but also the three steps of factor analysis (EFA, CFA and multi-group analysis).
Research limitations/implications
This survey was conducted with an assistant manager located in Korea. Therefore, it will be necessary to analyze both leader and employee engagement for those who live in foreign countries. The EES is useful to leaders and human resource managers because it is applicable to managing engagement levels of employees and fosters customized training programs.
Originality/value
This is the first study to develop measurement tools for employee engagement in South Korea. In addition, most studies demonstrated that individual feeling was valued to drive employee engagement. This research, however, proposes an extended concept of employee engagement for four dimensions (person, work, relation and organization) and emphasizes the important relationship between individuals and colleagues in an organization. Based on these results, a theoretically integrated model of employee engagement was developed and a practically valid measurement tool for capturing comprehensive domains of employee engagement was proposed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Employee Attitudes</subject><subject>Employee involvement</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Figurative Language</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Human Resources</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Internal public relations</subject><subject>Job Performance</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Organizational Effectiveness</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>2046-9012</issn><issn>2046-9020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gAch4Hk1k-xXvUlbP2rBg_W8xGRat-xu1iRb7L83a0tBMJcM8z4zgSeEXAK7AWD57Wy-nEYAEWecRQyS5IQMOIvTaBwap8ca-DkZObdh4eQJQBoPiJ7iFivTls2aSlqjdJ3FGhtPnZIV0pWxFOu2MjtEis1arn_TuwBvZVVq6UvTUOc7vaNlE7pvpvOf9MVYlA1VpvH47S_I2UpWDkeHe0jeH2bLyVO0eH18ntwvIsUh9xHXWjCNieSZjAFyiXrMY6ZyppQWGpWWkPOPLEMhRRozlijgChEUUwGVYkiu93tba746dL7YmM424cmCp2kOGWRiHCjYU8oa5yyuitaWtbS7AljR-yx6n6Eqep9F7zPMXO1n0JbqyM_mIETvOOTskNdoZaX_Xfnni8QP3gGBFA</recordid><startdate>20220526</startdate><enddate>20220526</enddate><creator>So, Byung Han</creator><creator>Kim, Ji Hyun</creator><creator>Ro, Yun Jeong</creator><creator>Song, Ji Hoon</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220526</creationdate><title>Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context</title><author>So, Byung Han ; Kim, Ji Hyun ; Ro, Yun Jeong ; Song, Ji Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-2dd30de5a27a4118aed9240c80ccd3decda182b77e3a364005c12cee1c0ced9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Employee Attitudes</topic><topic>Employee involvement</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Figurative Language</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Human Resources</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Internal public relations</topic><topic>Job Performance</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Organizational Effectiveness</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>So, Byung Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ji Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ro, Yun Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Ji Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of training and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>So, Byung Han</au><au>Kim, Ji Hyun</au><au>Ro, Yun Jeong</au><au>Song, Ji Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1339020</ericid><atitle>Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context</atitle><jtitle>European journal of training and development</jtitle><date>2022-05-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5/6</issue><spage>585</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>585-606</pages><issn>2046-9012</issn><eissn>2046-9020</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop a reliable and valid measurement scale of employee engagement that can be used in human resources departments in any industry field.
Design/methodology/approach
This study used the measurement development process with three steps. The first step was to generate items for measuring employee engagement. For this reason, the authors proposed an integrated conceptual model based on the results of a literature review and justify the concepts from self-determination theory and person-environment fit theory as the theoretical foundation. The second step was to determine the types of questions suitable for measurement, examining the content validity. Content validity was conducted two times by the group, academic experts and business practitioners. The last step was to examine the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multi-group analysis and reliability with 352 survey responses from the South Korean business context.
Findings
Findings of the measurement scale development procedure, i.e. employee engagement, should be managed in a balanced manner in all dimensions, as it is composed of four dimensions (person engagement, work engagement, organization engagement and relation engagement) and 16 sub-factors. Additionally, organization engagement was the major factor among the four dimensions of employee engagement with the highest variance explanation. From the statistical standpoint, the employee engagement scale (EES) is possible to use in any industry field because it demonstrated not only content validity and internal consistency reliability but also the three steps of factor analysis (EFA, CFA and multi-group analysis).
Research limitations/implications
This survey was conducted with an assistant manager located in Korea. Therefore, it will be necessary to analyze both leader and employee engagement for those who live in foreign countries. The EES is useful to leaders and human resource managers because it is applicable to managing engagement levels of employees and fosters customized training programs.
Originality/value
This is the first study to develop measurement tools for employee engagement in South Korea. In addition, most studies demonstrated that individual feeling was valued to drive employee engagement. This research, however, proposes an extended concept of employee engagement for four dimensions (person, work, relation and organization) and emphasizes the important relationship between individuals and colleagues in an organization. Based on these results, a theoretically integrated model of employee engagement was developed and a practically valid measurement tool for capturing comprehensive domains of employee engagement was proposed.</abstract><cop>Limerick</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/EJTD-11-2020-0155</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-9012 |
ispartof | European journal of training and development, 2022-05, Vol.46 (5/6), p.585-606 |
issn | 2046-9012 2046-9020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_EJTD-11-2020-0155 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); ERIC; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Academic Achievement Burnout Employee Attitudes Employee involvement Factor Analysis Figurative Language Foreign Countries Human Resources Incentives Internal public relations Job Performance Job Satisfaction Literature reviews Motivation Organizational Effectiveness Resistance (Psychology) Self Management Social exchange theory Test Construction Test Reliability Test Validity Values |
title | Developing a measurement scale for employee engagement: a validation study in a South Korean context |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20a%20measurement%20scale%20for%20employee%20engagement:%20a%20validation%20study%20in%20a%20South%20Korean%20context&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20training%20and%20development&rft.au=So,%20Byung%20Han&rft.date=2022-05-26&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5/6&rft.spage=585&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=585-606&rft.issn=2046-9012&rft.eissn=2046-9020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/EJTD-11-2020-0155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2668171739%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c218t-2dd30de5a27a4118aed9240c80ccd3decda182b77e3a364005c12cee1c0ced9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2668171739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1339020&rfr_iscdi=true |