Loading…

Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the strategic options available to a weaker actor to counteract the dominance of a stronger actor in a buyer-supplier relationship, and identifies those factors that influence the choice of individual options. Design/methodology/approach – Following...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of physical distribution & logistics management 2015-03, Vol.45 (1/2), p.182-203
Main Authors: Habib, Farooq, Bastl, Marko, Pilbeam, Colin
Format: Article
Language:eng ; jpn
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1592-2fed0d28e7fdd903e258512dbdedf2c4ccb204620e37cef7ffaf20a36174eec13
cites
container_end_page 203
container_issue 1/2
container_start_page 182
container_title International journal of physical distribution & logistics management
container_volume 45
creator Habib, Farooq
Bastl, Marko
Pilbeam, Colin
description Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the strategic options available to a weaker actor to counteract the dominance of a stronger actor in a buyer-supplier relationship, and identifies those factors that influence the choice of individual options. Design/methodology/approach – Following a systematic literature review methodology, a five-phase approach of planning, searching, screening, extraction and synthesis was rigorously employed. In total, 48 studies were used to draw conclusions about the phenomena of interest. Findings – Captured in an integrated conceptual framework, this study identified five strategic options available to the weaker actor in order to counteract a power dominance of a stronger player, which were underpinned by seven influencing factors. Research limitations/implications – The proposed conceptual framework requires first qualitative empirical validation using an abductive multi-case strategy, followed by a theory testing phase, employing a configurational approach. Practical implications – The proposed framework suggested that the weaker actor in a buyer-supplier relationship has five options to address power dominance. These options were available within as well as beyond a focal dyadic relationship. For the stronger actor, the authors showed that power dominance is a temporary state rather than permanent. Originality/value – This study marks one of the first attempts to present a coherent set of strategic options and underpinning factors to counteract power dominance in a buyer-supplier relationship from the perspective of a weaker actor. Given the underexplored nature of the topic, the study also provides guidelines for further research.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>emerald</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_IJPDLM-05-2013-0138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1592-2fed0d28e7fdd903e258512dbdedf2c4ccb204620e37cef7ffaf20a36174eec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtKxDAYhYMoWEefwE1eIPonaXpZyujoSEVBBXclTf5opJeQdJB5eyu6dHE4i8N3Fh8h5xwuOIfqcnv_dN08MFBMAJdsSXVAMl6qihVF_nZIMqgLYABSHZOTlD4BgNdSZGTzPEc947s3NGIK05gw0XmiYfrCSO00-FGPBqkfabfbY2RpF0Lvly1ir2e_AB8-pFNy5HSf8OyvV-R1c_OyvmPN4-12fdUww1UtmHBowYoKS2dtDRKFqhQXtrNonTC5MZ2AvBCAsjToSue0E6Blwcsc0XC5IuL3FweMurdtiH7Qcd9yaH9MtP-YkN_iZVOO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Habib, Farooq ; Bastl, Marko ; Pilbeam, Colin</creator><creatorcontrib>Habib, Farooq ; Bastl, Marko ; Pilbeam, Colin</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the strategic options available to a weaker actor to counteract the dominance of a stronger actor in a buyer-supplier relationship, and identifies those factors that influence the choice of individual options. Design/methodology/approach – Following a systematic literature review methodology, a five-phase approach of planning, searching, screening, extraction and synthesis was rigorously employed. In total, 48 studies were used to draw conclusions about the phenomena of interest. Findings – Captured in an integrated conceptual framework, this study identified five strategic options available to the weaker actor in order to counteract a power dominance of a stronger player, which were underpinned by seven influencing factors. Research limitations/implications – The proposed conceptual framework requires first qualitative empirical validation using an abductive multi-case strategy, followed by a theory testing phase, employing a configurational approach. Practical implications – The proposed framework suggested that the weaker actor in a buyer-supplier relationship has five options to address power dominance. These options were available within as well as beyond a focal dyadic relationship. For the stronger actor, the authors showed that power dominance is a temporary state rather than permanent. Originality/value – This study marks one of the first attempts to present a coherent set of strategic options and underpinning factors to counteract power dominance in a buyer-supplier relationship from the perspective of a weaker actor. Given the underexplored nature of the topic, the study also provides guidelines for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-0035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-664X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138</identifier><language>eng ; jpn</language><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Distribution management &amp; systems ; Logistics ; Management science &amp; operations</subject><ispartof>International journal of physical distribution &amp; logistics management, 2015-03, Vol.45 (1/2), p.182-203</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1592-2fed0d28e7fdd903e258512dbdedf2c4ccb204620e37cef7ffaf20a36174eec13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habib, Farooq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastl, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilbeam, Colin</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships</title><title>International journal of physical distribution &amp; logistics management</title><description>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the strategic options available to a weaker actor to counteract the dominance of a stronger actor in a buyer-supplier relationship, and identifies those factors that influence the choice of individual options. Design/methodology/approach – Following a systematic literature review methodology, a five-phase approach of planning, searching, screening, extraction and synthesis was rigorously employed. In total, 48 studies were used to draw conclusions about the phenomena of interest. Findings – Captured in an integrated conceptual framework, this study identified five strategic options available to the weaker actor in order to counteract a power dominance of a stronger player, which were underpinned by seven influencing factors. Research limitations/implications – The proposed conceptual framework requires first qualitative empirical validation using an abductive multi-case strategy, followed by a theory testing phase, employing a configurational approach. Practical implications – The proposed framework suggested that the weaker actor in a buyer-supplier relationship has five options to address power dominance. These options were available within as well as beyond a focal dyadic relationship. For the stronger actor, the authors showed that power dominance is a temporary state rather than permanent. Originality/value – This study marks one of the first attempts to present a coherent set of strategic options and underpinning factors to counteract power dominance in a buyer-supplier relationship from the perspective of a weaker actor. Given the underexplored nature of the topic, the study also provides guidelines for further research.</description><subject>Distribution management &amp; systems</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Management science &amp; operations</subject><issn>0960-0035</issn><issn>1758-664X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptkMtKxDAYhYMoWEefwE1eIPonaXpZyujoSEVBBXclTf5opJeQdJB5eyu6dHE4i8N3Fh8h5xwuOIfqcnv_dN08MFBMAJdsSXVAMl6qihVF_nZIMqgLYABSHZOTlD4BgNdSZGTzPEc947s3NGIK05gw0XmiYfrCSO00-FGPBqkfabfbY2RpF0Lvly1ir2e_AB8-pFNy5HSf8OyvV-R1c_OyvmPN4-12fdUww1UtmHBowYoKS2dtDRKFqhQXtrNonTC5MZ2AvBCAsjToSue0E6Blwcsc0XC5IuL3FweMurdtiH7Qcd9yaH9MtP-YkN_iZVOO</recordid><startdate>20150302</startdate><enddate>20150302</enddate><creator>Habib, Farooq</creator><creator>Bastl, Marko</creator><creator>Pilbeam, Colin</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20150302</creationdate><title>Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships</title><author>Habib, Farooq ; Bastl, Marko ; Pilbeam, Colin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1592-2fed0d28e7fdd903e258512dbdedf2c4ccb204620e37cef7ffaf20a36174eec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; jpn</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Distribution management &amp; systems</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Management science &amp; operations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habib, Farooq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastl, Marko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilbeam, Colin</creatorcontrib><jtitle>International journal of physical distribution &amp; logistics management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habib, Farooq</au><au>Bastl, Marko</au><au>Pilbeam, Colin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships</atitle><jtitle>International journal of physical distribution &amp; logistics management</jtitle><date>2015-03-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>182-203</pages><issn>0960-0035</issn><eissn>1758-664X</eissn><abstract>Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the strategic options available to a weaker actor to counteract the dominance of a stronger actor in a buyer-supplier relationship, and identifies those factors that influence the choice of individual options. Design/methodology/approach – Following a systematic literature review methodology, a five-phase approach of planning, searching, screening, extraction and synthesis was rigorously employed. In total, 48 studies were used to draw conclusions about the phenomena of interest. Findings – Captured in an integrated conceptual framework, this study identified five strategic options available to the weaker actor in order to counteract a power dominance of a stronger player, which were underpinned by seven influencing factors. Research limitations/implications – The proposed conceptual framework requires first qualitative empirical validation using an abductive multi-case strategy, followed by a theory testing phase, employing a configurational approach. Practical implications – The proposed framework suggested that the weaker actor in a buyer-supplier relationship has five options to address power dominance. These options were available within as well as beyond a focal dyadic relationship. For the stronger actor, the authors showed that power dominance is a temporary state rather than permanent. Originality/value – This study marks one of the first attempts to present a coherent set of strategic options and underpinning factors to counteract power dominance in a buyer-supplier relationship from the perspective of a weaker actor. Given the underexplored nature of the topic, the study also provides guidelines for further research.</abstract><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-0035
ispartof International journal of physical distribution & logistics management, 2015-03, Vol.45 (1/2), p.182-203
issn 0960-0035
1758-664X
language eng ; jpn
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_IJPDLM-05-2013-0138
source ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Distribution management & systems
Logistics
Management science & operations
title Strategic responses to power dominance in buyer-supplier relationships
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T23%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-emerald&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20responses%20to%20power%20dominance%20in%20buyer-supplier%20relationships&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20physical%20distribution%20&%20logistics%20management&rft.au=Habib,%20Farooq&rft.date=2015-03-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=182-203&rft.issn=0960-0035&rft.eissn=1758-664X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138&rft_dat=%3Cemerald%3E10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0138%3C/emerald%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1592-2fed0d28e7fdd903e258512dbdedf2c4ccb204620e37cef7ffaf20a36174eec13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true