Loading…
Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico
Purpose This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of knowledge management 2022-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1649-1675 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273 |
container_end_page | 1675 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1649 |
container_title | Journal of knowledge management |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Garza Burgos, Rodrigo Johnson, James P. Loughry, Misty L.L. |
description | Purpose
This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002).
Findings
Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms.
Research limitations/implications
The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample.
Practical implications
OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes.
Social implications
The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance.
Originality/value
The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2021-0301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692699744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLxDAUhYsoOI7uXQZc18mrabsSGd_O4EZ3QkiTmyFD24xJZ1B_vSnjRhAu3AfnXDhflp0TfEkIrmZPz8sc85xiSnLMMDnIJqQsqrzkFT9MMxNlzmiJj7OTGNcYE15zMcnebzxE5MNK9e5bDc73qkUtqNC7foWMsxYCcj3qVL-1Sg_bMN5Vb1CEsHMakHWhi1foducM9OMefIeW8Om0P82OrGojnP32afZ2d_s6f8gXL_eP8-tFrhmjQ24qagrDjC6ZqWyjGaXcpoEJoA2Foi4aAayubCEM1kRTqCvGADdUCJMysWl2sf-7Cf5jC3GQa78NKUmUVNSp6pLzpMJ7lQ4-xgBWboLrVPiSBMuRoUwMJeZyZChHhsky21ugg6Ba85_jD3X2A6WacwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2692699744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><source>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo ; Johnson, James P. ; Loughry, Misty L.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo ; Johnson, James P. ; Loughry, Misty L.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002).
Findings
Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms.
Research limitations/implications
The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample.
Practical implications
OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes.
Social implications
The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance.
Originality/value
The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kempston: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Customer services ; Emerging markets ; Knowledge ; Knowledge management ; Learning ; Managers ; Manufacturing ; Organizational learning ; Profits ; Service industries ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Journal of knowledge management, 2022-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1649-1675</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2692699744/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2692699744?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21381,21394,27305,27924,27925,33611,33906,34135,36060,43733,43892,44363,74221,74409,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughry, Misty L.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</title><title>Journal of knowledge management</title><description>Purpose
This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002).
Findings
Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms.
Research limitations/implications
The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample.
Practical implications
OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes.
Social implications
The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance.
Originality/value
The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.</description><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>1367-3270</issn><issn>1758-7484</issn><issn>1367-3270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLxDAUhYsoOI7uXQZc18mrabsSGd_O4EZ3QkiTmyFD24xJZ1B_vSnjRhAu3AfnXDhflp0TfEkIrmZPz8sc85xiSnLMMDnIJqQsqrzkFT9MMxNlzmiJj7OTGNcYE15zMcnebzxE5MNK9e5bDc73qkUtqNC7foWMsxYCcj3qVL-1Sg_bMN5Vb1CEsHMakHWhi1foducM9OMefIeW8Om0P82OrGojnP32afZ2d_s6f8gXL_eP8-tFrhmjQ24qagrDjC6ZqWyjGaXcpoEJoA2Foi4aAayubCEM1kRTqCvGADdUCJMysWl2sf-7Cf5jC3GQa78NKUmUVNSp6pLzpMJ7lQ4-xgBWboLrVPiSBMuRoUwMJeZyZChHhsky21ugg6Ba85_jD3X2A6WacwY</recordid><startdate>20220726</startdate><enddate>20220726</enddate><creator>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Johnson, James P.</creator><creator>Loughry, Misty L.L.</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220726</creationdate><title>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</title><author>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo ; Johnson, James P. ; Loughry, Misty L.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughry, Misty L.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</au><au>Johnson, James P.</au><au>Loughry, Misty L.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle><date>2022-07-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1649</spage><epage>1675</epage><pages>1649-1675</pages><issn>1367-3270</issn><eissn>1758-7484</eissn><eissn>1367-3270</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002).
Findings
Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms.
Research limitations/implications
The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample.
Practical implications
OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes.
Social implications
The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance.
Originality/value
The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.</abstract><cop>Kempston</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1367-3270 |
ispartof | Journal of knowledge management, 2022-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1649-1675 |
issn | 1367-3270 1758-7484 1367-3270 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2021-0301 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Customer services Emerging markets Knowledge Knowledge management Learning Managers Manufacturing Organizational learning Profits Service industries Supervisors |
title | Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20organizational%20learning%20differ%20in%20manufacturing%20and%20service%20firms?%20Evidence%20from%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20knowledge%20management&rft.au=Garza%20Burgos,%20Rodrigo&rft.date=2022-07-26&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1649&rft.epage=1675&rft.pages=1649-1675&rft.issn=1367-3270&rft.eissn=1758-7484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2692699744%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2692699744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |