Loading…

Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico

Purpose This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of knowledge management 2022-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1649-1675
Main Authors: Garza Burgos, Rodrigo, Johnson, James P., Loughry, Misty L.L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273
container_end_page 1675
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1649
container_title Journal of knowledge management
container_volume 26
creator Garza Burgos, Rodrigo
Johnson, James P.
Loughry, Misty L.L.
description Purpose This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002). Findings Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms. Research limitations/implications The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample. Practical implications OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes. Social implications The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance. Originality/value The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2021-0301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692699744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLxDAUhYsoOI7uXQZc18mrabsSGd_O4EZ3QkiTmyFD24xJZ1B_vSnjRhAu3AfnXDhflp0TfEkIrmZPz8sc85xiSnLMMDnIJqQsqrzkFT9MMxNlzmiJj7OTGNcYE15zMcnebzxE5MNK9e5bDc73qkUtqNC7foWMsxYCcj3qVL-1Sg_bMN5Vb1CEsHMakHWhi1foducM9OMefIeW8Om0P82OrGojnP32afZ2d_s6f8gXL_eP8-tFrhmjQ24qagrDjC6ZqWyjGaXcpoEJoA2Foi4aAayubCEM1kRTqCvGADdUCJMysWl2sf-7Cf5jC3GQa78NKUmUVNSp6pLzpMJ7lQ4-xgBWboLrVPiSBMuRoUwMJeZyZChHhsky21ugg6Ba85_jD3X2A6WacwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2692699744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo ; Johnson, James P. ; Loughry, Misty L.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo ; Johnson, James P. ; Loughry, Misty L.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002). Findings Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms. Research limitations/implications The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample. Practical implications OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes. Social implications The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance. Originality/value The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1367-3270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kempston: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Customer services ; Emerging markets ; Knowledge ; Knowledge management ; Learning ; Managers ; Manufacturing ; Organizational learning ; Profits ; Service industries ; Supervisors</subject><ispartof>Journal of knowledge management, 2022-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1649-1675</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2692699744/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2692699744?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21381,21394,27305,27924,27925,33611,33906,34135,36060,43733,43892,44363,74221,74409,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughry, Misty L.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</title><title>Journal of knowledge management</title><description>Purpose This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002). Findings Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms. Research limitations/implications The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample. Practical implications OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes. Social implications The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance. Originality/value The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.</description><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><issn>1367-3270</issn><issn>1758-7484</issn><issn>1367-3270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtLxDAUhYsoOI7uXQZc18mrabsSGd_O4EZ3QkiTmyFD24xJZ1B_vSnjRhAu3AfnXDhflp0TfEkIrmZPz8sc85xiSnLMMDnIJqQsqrzkFT9MMxNlzmiJj7OTGNcYE15zMcnebzxE5MNK9e5bDc73qkUtqNC7foWMsxYCcj3qVL-1Sg_bMN5Vb1CEsHMakHWhi1foducM9OMefIeW8Om0P82OrGojnP32afZ2d_s6f8gXL_eP8-tFrhmjQ24qagrDjC6ZqWyjGaXcpoEJoA2Foi4aAayubCEM1kRTqCvGADdUCJMysWl2sf-7Cf5jC3GQa78NKUmUVNSp6pLzpMJ7lQ4-xgBWboLrVPiSBMuRoUwMJeZyZChHhsky21ugg6Ba85_jD3X2A6WacwY</recordid><startdate>20220726</startdate><enddate>20220726</enddate><creator>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Johnson, James P.</creator><creator>Loughry, Misty L.L.</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220726</creationdate><title>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</title><author>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo ; Johnson, James P. ; Loughry, Misty L.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loughry, Misty L.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garza Burgos, Rodrigo</au><au>Johnson, James P.</au><au>Loughry, Misty L.L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Journal of knowledge management</jtitle><date>2022-07-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1649</spage><epage>1675</epage><pages>1649-1675</pages><issn>1367-3270</issn><eissn>1758-7484</eissn><eissn>1367-3270</eissn><abstract>Purpose This paper aims to investigate organizational learning (OL) at the individual, group and organizational levels in service and manufacturing firms in Mexico to determine if there are differences in how OL operates or in the link between OL and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors surveyed experienced managers from 1,093 Mexican firms across a range of service and manufacturing industries, using the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (Bontis et al., 2002). Findings Organizational learning processes (OLPs) were highly similar in service and manufacturing firms and OL had a strong positive association with performance in both types of firms. OLPs at the individual level had a slightly greater impact on performance for service firms. Research limitations/implications The results provide further evidence of the strong link between OL and firm performance. There were no significant correlations of firm size or age with the OLPs or firm performance. However, the micro-companies that constitute 95% of Mexican firms were under-represented in the sample. Practical implications OLPs are equally important in manufacturing and service firms and across developed and developing economies. Therefore, OL should pervade all organizations. Managers should create cultures that encourage employees to produce new ideas and share those ideas with peers and supervisors through both formal and informal communication processes. Social implications The findings indicate that the individual employees’ contributions to OL are the main driver of the impact of OLPs on firm performance and that individual-level learning processes are even more relevant for service firms than for manufacturing firms. As value co-production takes place simultaneously at the moment of the service delivery/service consumption, the individual learning stock is fundamental for enhanced firm performance. Originality/value The authors believe this to be the first large-scale study to compare OLPs in manufacturing and service firms across industries in a major emerging market.</abstract><cop>Kempston</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-3270
ispartof Journal of knowledge management, 2022-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1649-1675
issn 1367-3270
1758-7484
1367-3270
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_JKM-04-2021-0301
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; ProQuest ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Customer services
Emerging markets
Knowledge
Knowledge management
Learning
Managers
Manufacturing
Organizational learning
Profits
Service industries
Supervisors
title Does organizational learning differ in manufacturing and service firms? Evidence from Mexico
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20organizational%20learning%20differ%20in%20manufacturing%20and%20service%20firms?%20Evidence%20from%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20knowledge%20management&rft.au=Garza%20Burgos,%20Rodrigo&rft.date=2022-07-26&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1649&rft.epage=1675&rft.pages=1649-1675&rft.issn=1367-3270&rft.eissn=1758-7484&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2692699744%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-d82d5d3dc73d8fbc3224f8fb36e2b2e595b6e398f56d0c1c2e9833e0b266d3273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2692699744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true