Loading…
An optimal charging strategy for crowdsourcing platforms
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal charging strategy for a third-party crowdsourcing platform. Design/methodology/approach Based on the auction theory, the Stackelberg game theory and the systems theory, this paper presents a new model from the perspective of risk sharing bet...
Saved in:
Published in: | Kybernetes 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1605-1621 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943 |
container_end_page | 1621 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1605 |
container_title | Kybernetes |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Chen, Jiumei Liu, Zhiying Zhang, Wen Gong, Bengang |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal charging strategy for a third-party crowdsourcing platform.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on the auction theory, the Stackelberg game theory and the systems theory, this paper presents a new model from the perspective of risk sharing between solution seekers and the crowdsourcing platform, given the utility maximization of the seekers, the crowdsourcing platform and the solvers.
Findings
Based on the results, this study shows that the menu of fees, which includes different combinations of a fixed fee and a floating fee schedule, should be designed to attract both solution seekers and solvers. In addition, the related prize setting and the expected payoff for each party are presented.
Practical implications
This study is beneficial for crowdsourcing platform operators, as it provides a new way to design charging strategies and can help in understanding key influential factors.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to simulate the interactions among the three stakeholders, thereby providing a novel model that includes a fixed fee and a floating commission. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/K-03-2019-0173 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_K-03-2019-0173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2533390681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXzwueUyeZzdexFL9owYuCt5DNZmvLtrsmW6T_vVnqRTwNzLw38-ZHyC2DGWOg75cUkHJghgJTeEYmTAlNldZ4TiaAUtPS8I9LcpXSFoBxyWFC9HxfdP2w2bm28J8urjf7dZGG6IawPhZNFwsfu-86dYfox1HfuiF3d-maXDSuTeHmt07J--PD2-KZrl6fXhbzFfUIYqBSKqcQSg6qCr6W6GSFVagRK9EIbFgVuEEZEJgOzNfKGOEbU5da-NqZEqfk7rS3j93XIaTBbnOWfT5puUBEA1KzrJqdVDltSjE0to_5p3i0DOxIxy4toB3p2JFONtCTIexCdG39X_-HJv4ASQNkcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2533390681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An optimal charging strategy for crowdsourcing platforms</title><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Chen, Jiumei ; Liu, Zhiying ; Zhang, Wen ; Gong, Bengang</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiumei ; Liu, Zhiying ; Zhang, Wen ; Gong, Bengang</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal charging strategy for a third-party crowdsourcing platform.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on the auction theory, the Stackelberg game theory and the systems theory, this paper presents a new model from the perspective of risk sharing between solution seekers and the crowdsourcing platform, given the utility maximization of the seekers, the crowdsourcing platform and the solvers.
Findings
Based on the results, this study shows that the menu of fees, which includes different combinations of a fixed fee and a floating fee schedule, should be designed to attract both solution seekers and solvers. In addition, the related prize setting and the expected payoff for each party are presented.
Practical implications
This study is beneficial for crowdsourcing platform operators, as it provides a new way to design charging strategies and can help in understanding key influential factors.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to simulate the interactions among the three stakeholders, thereby providing a novel model that includes a fixed fee and a floating commission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0368-492X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/K-03-2019-0173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Charging ; Collaboration ; Crowdsourcing ; Data collection ; Game theory ; Innovations ; Internet ; Labor market ; Library management ; Linux ; Literature reviews ; Open source software ; Optimization ; Prediction markets ; Product development ; Public policy ; Risk sharing ; Schedules ; Solvers ; Strategy ; Success ; Systems theory ; Third party</subject><ispartof>Kybernetes, 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1605-1621</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiumei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Bengang</creatorcontrib><title>An optimal charging strategy for crowdsourcing platforms</title><title>Kybernetes</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal charging strategy for a third-party crowdsourcing platform.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on the auction theory, the Stackelberg game theory and the systems theory, this paper presents a new model from the perspective of risk sharing between solution seekers and the crowdsourcing platform, given the utility maximization of the seekers, the crowdsourcing platform and the solvers.
Findings
Based on the results, this study shows that the menu of fees, which includes different combinations of a fixed fee and a floating fee schedule, should be designed to attract both solution seekers and solvers. In addition, the related prize setting and the expected payoff for each party are presented.
Practical implications
This study is beneficial for crowdsourcing platform operators, as it provides a new way to design charging strategies and can help in understanding key influential factors.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to simulate the interactions among the three stakeholders, thereby providing a novel model that includes a fixed fee and a floating commission.</description><subject>Charging</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Crowdsourcing</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Library management</subject><subject>Linux</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Open source software</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Prediction markets</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Risk sharing</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Solvers</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Systems theory</subject><subject>Third party</subject><issn>0368-492X</issn><issn>1758-7883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkM1LAzEQxYMoWKtXzwueUyeZzdexFL9owYuCt5DNZmvLtrsmW6T_vVnqRTwNzLw38-ZHyC2DGWOg75cUkHJghgJTeEYmTAlNldZ4TiaAUtPS8I9LcpXSFoBxyWFC9HxfdP2w2bm28J8urjf7dZGG6IawPhZNFwsfu-86dYfox1HfuiF3d-maXDSuTeHmt07J--PD2-KZrl6fXhbzFfUIYqBSKqcQSg6qCr6W6GSFVagRK9EIbFgVuEEZEJgOzNfKGOEbU5da-NqZEqfk7rS3j93XIaTBbnOWfT5puUBEA1KzrJqdVDltSjE0to_5p3i0DOxIxy4toB3p2JFONtCTIexCdG39X_-HJv4ASQNkcw</recordid><startdate>20200611</startdate><enddate>20200611</enddate><creator>Chen, Jiumei</creator><creator>Liu, Zhiying</creator><creator>Zhang, Wen</creator><creator>Gong, Bengang</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200611</creationdate><title>An optimal charging strategy for crowdsourcing platforms</title><author>Chen, Jiumei ; Liu, Zhiying ; Zhang, Wen ; Gong, Bengang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Charging</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Crowdsourcing</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Library management</topic><topic>Linux</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Open source software</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Prediction markets</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Risk sharing</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Solvers</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Systems theory</topic><topic>Third party</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jiumei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Bengang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Jiumei</au><au>Liu, Zhiying</au><au>Zhang, Wen</au><au>Gong, Bengang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An optimal charging strategy for crowdsourcing platforms</atitle><jtitle>Kybernetes</jtitle><date>2020-06-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1605</spage><epage>1621</epage><pages>1605-1621</pages><issn>0368-492X</issn><eissn>1758-7883</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to develop an optimal charging strategy for a third-party crowdsourcing platform.
Design/methodology/approach
Based on the auction theory, the Stackelberg game theory and the systems theory, this paper presents a new model from the perspective of risk sharing between solution seekers and the crowdsourcing platform, given the utility maximization of the seekers, the crowdsourcing platform and the solvers.
Findings
Based on the results, this study shows that the menu of fees, which includes different combinations of a fixed fee and a floating fee schedule, should be designed to attract both solution seekers and solvers. In addition, the related prize setting and the expected payoff for each party are presented.
Practical implications
This study is beneficial for crowdsourcing platform operators, as it provides a new way to design charging strategies and can help in understanding key influential factors.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to simulate the interactions among the three stakeholders, thereby providing a novel model that includes a fixed fee and a floating commission.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/K-03-2019-0173</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0368-492X |
ispartof | Kybernetes, 2020-06, Vol.49 (6), p.1605-1621 |
issn | 0368-492X 1758-7883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_K-03-2019-0173 |
source | Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Charging Collaboration Crowdsourcing Data collection Game theory Innovations Internet Labor market Library management Linux Literature reviews Open source software Optimization Prediction markets Product development Public policy Risk sharing Schedules Solvers Strategy Success Systems theory Third party |
title | An optimal charging strategy for crowdsourcing platforms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A26%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20optimal%20charging%20strategy%20for%20crowdsourcing%20platforms&rft.jtitle=Kybernetes&rft.au=Chen,%20Jiumei&rft.date=2020-06-11&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1605&rft.epage=1621&rft.pages=1605-1621&rft.issn=0368-492X&rft.eissn=1758-7883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/K-03-2019-0173&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2533390681%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-667a7304207becd63a6b3bed33b5f53f1be2936e3018e1cd7995cf9d485cda943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2533390681&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |