Loading…

Research on impact evaluation of academic journals from multidimensional perspective

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce altmetric indicators and combine with traditional citation indicators to comprehensively evaluate the impact of academic journals from the perspective of multidimensional and multi-indicator fusion. Design/methodology/approach The authors take intern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Library hi tech 2020-06, Vol.38 (2), p.458-478
Main Authors: Zhao, Rongying, Wang, Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c877-de3fb3d2a05f6309127b9265ed35fa12333652d652a713df4fbbc073404dbf3f3
cites
container_end_page 478
container_issue 2
container_start_page 458
container_title Library hi tech
container_volume 38
creator Zhao, Rongying
Wang, Xu
description Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce altmetric indicators and combine with traditional citation indicators to comprehensively evaluate the impact of academic journals from the perspective of multidimensional and multi-indicator fusion. Design/methodology/approach The authors take international multidisciplinary journals as an example, combining 14 traditional citation indicators of academic journals and introducing 14 altmetric indicators to build a comprehensive evaluation model of the impact of academic journals (academic impact and societal impact). At the same time, the authors systematically construct a journal evaluation indicator system from three dimensions. Then, the indicators data of three dimensions are evaluated by normalized processing, correlation analysis, reliability and validity analysis, PCA and factor analysis. Findings Two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses can exactly provide some useful information for academic journals’ location in the respective coordinate systems. There are strong positive correlations among the measured indicators in the three dimensions, and each indicator has a significant consistency between whole and internal. The correlation coefficient between FD1 and FD2 is 0.888 with a strong positive correlation. It shows that the traditional citation indicators provided by WoS and Scopus database are highly consistent, and they are comparable and alternative in evaluating the academic impact of journals. The correlation coefficients of FD1, FD2 with FD3 are 0.831 and 0.798. There are strong positive correlations among them, which indicate that the evaluation of journals’ societal impact based on altmetrics indicator can be considered as a potential supplement to academic impact evaluation based on citation and to reflect the multidimensional nature of journals impact in an immediate way. Originality/value Multidimensional and multi-indicator perspective evaluation can provide references for the selection of impact evaluation indicators and model optimization of academic journals, and also provide new ideas for improving the status of the impact evaluation of academic journals.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/LHT-03-2019-0067
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>emerald</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_LHT-03-2019-0067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.1108/LHT-03-2019-0067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c877-de3fb3d2a05f6309127b9265ed35fa12333652d652a713df4fbbc073404dbf3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LxDAUxIMouK7ePeYLxH3Ja5vuURZ1hYIgPXgrr_mDWZq2pO2C396KnjwMA8OPgRnG7iU8SAnlrjrWAlAokHsBUOgLtlGQZ0IWxccl24BGLcoS5TW7maYTAORKqw2r393kKJlPPvQ8xJHMzN2ZuoXmsCaD52TIuhgMPw1L6qmbuE9D5HHp5mBDdP20gtTx0aVpdGYOZ3fLrvwKurs_37L6-ak-HEX19vJ6eKyEKbUW1qFv0SqC3BcIe6l0u1dF7izmnqRCxCJXdhVpidZnvm3NuiODzLYePW7Z7rfWRZeos82YQqT01Uhofj5p_n-C34CcVYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research on impact evaluation of academic journals from multidimensional perspective</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><creator>Zhao, Rongying ; Wang, Xu</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rongying ; Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce altmetric indicators and combine with traditional citation indicators to comprehensively evaluate the impact of academic journals from the perspective of multidimensional and multi-indicator fusion. Design/methodology/approach The authors take international multidisciplinary journals as an example, combining 14 traditional citation indicators of academic journals and introducing 14 altmetric indicators to build a comprehensive evaluation model of the impact of academic journals (academic impact and societal impact). At the same time, the authors systematically construct a journal evaluation indicator system from three dimensions. Then, the indicators data of three dimensions are evaluated by normalized processing, correlation analysis, reliability and validity analysis, PCA and factor analysis. Findings Two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses can exactly provide some useful information for academic journals’ location in the respective coordinate systems. There are strong positive correlations among the measured indicators in the three dimensions, and each indicator has a significant consistency between whole and internal. The correlation coefficient between FD1 and FD2 is 0.888 with a strong positive correlation. It shows that the traditional citation indicators provided by WoS and Scopus database are highly consistent, and they are comparable and alternative in evaluating the academic impact of journals. The correlation coefficients of FD1, FD2 with FD3 are 0.831 and 0.798. There are strong positive correlations among them, which indicate that the evaluation of journals’ societal impact based on altmetrics indicator can be considered as a potential supplement to academic impact evaluation based on citation and to reflect the multidimensional nature of journals impact in an immediate way. Originality/value Multidimensional and multi-indicator perspective evaluation can provide references for the selection of impact evaluation indicators and model optimization of academic journals, and also provide new ideas for improving the status of the impact evaluation of academic journals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-8831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2054-166X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/LHT-03-2019-0067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><ispartof>Library hi tech, 2020-06, Vol.38 (2), p.458-478</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c877-de3fb3d2a05f6309127b9265ed35fa12333652d652a713df4fbbc073404dbf3f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><title>Research on impact evaluation of academic journals from multidimensional perspective</title><title>Library hi tech</title><description>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce altmetric indicators and combine with traditional citation indicators to comprehensively evaluate the impact of academic journals from the perspective of multidimensional and multi-indicator fusion. Design/methodology/approach The authors take international multidisciplinary journals as an example, combining 14 traditional citation indicators of academic journals and introducing 14 altmetric indicators to build a comprehensive evaluation model of the impact of academic journals (academic impact and societal impact). At the same time, the authors systematically construct a journal evaluation indicator system from three dimensions. Then, the indicators data of three dimensions are evaluated by normalized processing, correlation analysis, reliability and validity analysis, PCA and factor analysis. Findings Two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses can exactly provide some useful information for academic journals’ location in the respective coordinate systems. There are strong positive correlations among the measured indicators in the three dimensions, and each indicator has a significant consistency between whole and internal. The correlation coefficient between FD1 and FD2 is 0.888 with a strong positive correlation. It shows that the traditional citation indicators provided by WoS and Scopus database are highly consistent, and they are comparable and alternative in evaluating the academic impact of journals. The correlation coefficients of FD1, FD2 with FD3 are 0.831 and 0.798. There are strong positive correlations among them, which indicate that the evaluation of journals’ societal impact based on altmetrics indicator can be considered as a potential supplement to academic impact evaluation based on citation and to reflect the multidimensional nature of journals impact in an immediate way. Originality/value Multidimensional and multi-indicator perspective evaluation can provide references for the selection of impact evaluation indicators and model optimization of academic journals, and also provide new ideas for improving the status of the impact evaluation of academic journals.</description><issn>0737-8831</issn><issn>2054-166X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpdkE9LxDAUxIMouK7ePeYLxH3Ja5vuURZ1hYIgPXgrr_mDWZq2pO2C396KnjwMA8OPgRnG7iU8SAnlrjrWAlAokHsBUOgLtlGQZ0IWxccl24BGLcoS5TW7maYTAORKqw2r393kKJlPPvQ8xJHMzN2ZuoXmsCaD52TIuhgMPw1L6qmbuE9D5HHp5mBDdP20gtTx0aVpdGYOZ3fLrvwKurs_37L6-ak-HEX19vJ6eKyEKbUW1qFv0SqC3BcIe6l0u1dF7izmnqRCxCJXdhVpidZnvm3NuiODzLYePW7Z7rfWRZeos82YQqT01Uhofj5p_n-C34CcVYk</recordid><startdate>20200611</startdate><enddate>20200611</enddate><creator>Zhao, Rongying</creator><creator>Wang, Xu</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20200611</creationdate><title>Research on impact evaluation of academic journals from multidimensional perspective</title><author>Zhao, Rongying ; Wang, Xu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c877-de3fb3d2a05f6309127b9265ed35fa12333652d652a713df4fbbc073404dbf3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Rongying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xu</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Rongying</au><au>Wang, Xu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research on impact evaluation of academic journals from multidimensional perspective</atitle><jtitle>Library hi tech</jtitle><date>2020-06-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>458</spage><epage>478</epage><pages>458-478</pages><issn>0737-8831</issn><eissn>2054-166X</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce altmetric indicators and combine with traditional citation indicators to comprehensively evaluate the impact of academic journals from the perspective of multidimensional and multi-indicator fusion. Design/methodology/approach The authors take international multidisciplinary journals as an example, combining 14 traditional citation indicators of academic journals and introducing 14 altmetric indicators to build a comprehensive evaluation model of the impact of academic journals (academic impact and societal impact). At the same time, the authors systematically construct a journal evaluation indicator system from three dimensions. Then, the indicators data of three dimensions are evaluated by normalized processing, correlation analysis, reliability and validity analysis, PCA and factor analysis. Findings Two-dimensional and three-dimensional analyses can exactly provide some useful information for academic journals’ location in the respective coordinate systems. There are strong positive correlations among the measured indicators in the three dimensions, and each indicator has a significant consistency between whole and internal. The correlation coefficient between FD1 and FD2 is 0.888 with a strong positive correlation. It shows that the traditional citation indicators provided by WoS and Scopus database are highly consistent, and they are comparable and alternative in evaluating the academic impact of journals. The correlation coefficients of FD1, FD2 with FD3 are 0.831 and 0.798. There are strong positive correlations among them, which indicate that the evaluation of journals’ societal impact based on altmetrics indicator can be considered as a potential supplement to academic impact evaluation based on citation and to reflect the multidimensional nature of journals impact in an immediate way. Originality/value Multidimensional and multi-indicator perspective evaluation can provide references for the selection of impact evaluation indicators and model optimization of academic journals, and also provide new ideas for improving the status of the impact evaluation of academic journals.</abstract><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/LHT-03-2019-0067</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-8831
ispartof Library hi tech, 2020-06, Vol.38 (2), p.458-478
issn 0737-8831
2054-166X
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_LHT-03-2019-0067
source ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection
title Research on impact evaluation of academic journals from multidimensional perspective
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A32%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-emerald&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20on%20impact%20evaluation%20of%20academic%20journals%20from%20multidimensional%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Library%20hi%20tech&rft.au=Zhao,%20Rongying&rft.date=2020-06-11&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=458&rft.epage=478&rft.pages=458-478&rft.issn=0737-8831&rft.eissn=2054-166X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/LHT-03-2019-0067&rft_dat=%3Cemerald%3E10.1108/LHT-03-2019-0067%3C/emerald%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c877-de3fb3d2a05f6309127b9265ed35fa12333652d652a713df4fbbc073404dbf3f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true