Loading…

Managing strategic uncertainty

Purpose Strategic uncertainty from emerging threats and opportunities in the business environment can significantly impact managers’ abilities to successfully implement their business strategy. A key strategic control and governance mechanism designed to enable managers to respond to strategic uncer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Managerial auditing journal 2016-04, Vol.31 (4/5), p.512-534
Main Authors: Cheng, Mandy M., Humphreys, Kerry A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c876-8cac4589ac673fe7fbd600298b2187b727b05c59d8b6437c1d1bfd50f49637fa3
cites
container_end_page 534
container_issue 4/5
container_start_page 512
container_title Managerial auditing journal
container_volume 31
creator Cheng, Mandy M.
Humphreys, Kerry A.
description Purpose Strategic uncertainty from emerging threats and opportunities in the business environment can significantly impact managers’ abilities to successfully implement their business strategy. A key strategic control and governance mechanism designed to enable managers to respond to strategic uncertainty is a strategic performance measurement system, such as the balanced scorecard (BSC). This study aims to investigate whether strategic uncertainty is associated with the diversity and types of performance measures in a BSC, which are used by managers for various strategic control and governance purposes. Design/methodology/approach A survey of senior-level managers within strategic business units of Australian Stock Exchange listed organizations was conducted. Findings This study finds that the extent to which managers face strategic uncertainty is positively associated with performance measurement diversity. Further, managers faced with greater strategic uncertainty use performance measures relatively more to evaluate subordinates’ performance, communicate business strategy, track performance against targets, identify problem areas and guide future directions. Outcome measures are used to a greater extent for all five purposes, whereas leading measures are used more only for future-oriented purposes. Practical implications Strategic performance measurement systems, such as the BSC, can and are being used to provide managers with the information and control mechanisms necessary to meet the challenges associated with strategic uncertainty. Originality/value This study provides the first evidence on the relations between strategic uncertainty, performance measurement diversity and managers’ use of performance measures for five key purposes. Understanding these relations is important, as managers need to formulate appropriate responses to strategic uncertainty, to protect and create value by exploiting emerging opportunities and managing associated threats.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1286
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>emerald</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_MAJ-12-2015-1286</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c876-8cac4589ac673fe7fbd600298b2187b727b05c59d8b6437c1d1bfd50f49637fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdz7tOwzAUgGELgUQo7EyoL2B6jm_HHquKq1qxdI-OHTsKaiPkhKFvDwgmpm_7pV-IW4R7RPCr3fpVopIK0H7r3ZlokKyXRNqeiwaU89IFUJfiapreAVAZNI242_HI_TD2y2muPOd-SMvPMeU68zDOp2txUfgw5Zs_F2L_-LDfPMvt29PLZr2VyZOTPnEy1gdOjnTJVGLnAFTwUaGnSIoi2GRD56MzmhJ2GEtnoZjgNBXWC7H6zeZjrnzo2o86HLmeWoT25679f6e_AOX5QLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing strategic uncertainty</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Cheng, Mandy M. ; Humphreys, Kerry A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Mandy M. ; Humphreys, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Strategic uncertainty from emerging threats and opportunities in the business environment can significantly impact managers’ abilities to successfully implement their business strategy. A key strategic control and governance mechanism designed to enable managers to respond to strategic uncertainty is a strategic performance measurement system, such as the balanced scorecard (BSC). This study aims to investigate whether strategic uncertainty is associated with the diversity and types of performance measures in a BSC, which are used by managers for various strategic control and governance purposes. Design/methodology/approach A survey of senior-level managers within strategic business units of Australian Stock Exchange listed organizations was conducted. Findings This study finds that the extent to which managers face strategic uncertainty is positively associated with performance measurement diversity. Further, managers faced with greater strategic uncertainty use performance measures relatively more to evaluate subordinates’ performance, communicate business strategy, track performance against targets, identify problem areas and guide future directions. Outcome measures are used to a greater extent for all five purposes, whereas leading measures are used more only for future-oriented purposes. Practical implications Strategic performance measurement systems, such as the BSC, can and are being used to provide managers with the information and control mechanisms necessary to meet the challenges associated with strategic uncertainty. Originality/value This study provides the first evidence on the relations between strategic uncertainty, performance measurement diversity and managers’ use of performance measures for five key purposes. Understanding these relations is important, as managers need to formulate appropriate responses to strategic uncertainty, to protect and create value by exploiting emerging opportunities and managing associated threats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-6902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1286</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><ispartof>Managerial auditing journal, 2016-04, Vol.31 (4/5), p.512-534</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c876-8cac4589ac673fe7fbd600298b2187b727b05c59d8b6437c1d1bfd50f49637fa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Mandy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><title>Managing strategic uncertainty</title><title>Managerial auditing journal</title><description>Purpose Strategic uncertainty from emerging threats and opportunities in the business environment can significantly impact managers’ abilities to successfully implement their business strategy. A key strategic control and governance mechanism designed to enable managers to respond to strategic uncertainty is a strategic performance measurement system, such as the balanced scorecard (BSC). This study aims to investigate whether strategic uncertainty is associated with the diversity and types of performance measures in a BSC, which are used by managers for various strategic control and governance purposes. Design/methodology/approach A survey of senior-level managers within strategic business units of Australian Stock Exchange listed organizations was conducted. Findings This study finds that the extent to which managers face strategic uncertainty is positively associated with performance measurement diversity. Further, managers faced with greater strategic uncertainty use performance measures relatively more to evaluate subordinates’ performance, communicate business strategy, track performance against targets, identify problem areas and guide future directions. Outcome measures are used to a greater extent for all five purposes, whereas leading measures are used more only for future-oriented purposes. Practical implications Strategic performance measurement systems, such as the BSC, can and are being used to provide managers with the information and control mechanisms necessary to meet the challenges associated with strategic uncertainty. Originality/value This study provides the first evidence on the relations between strategic uncertainty, performance measurement diversity and managers’ use of performance measures for five key purposes. Understanding these relations is important, as managers need to formulate appropriate responses to strategic uncertainty, to protect and create value by exploiting emerging opportunities and managing associated threats.</description><issn>0268-6902</issn><issn>1758-7735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpdz7tOwzAUgGELgUQo7EyoL2B6jm_HHquKq1qxdI-OHTsKaiPkhKFvDwgmpm_7pV-IW4R7RPCr3fpVopIK0H7r3ZlokKyXRNqeiwaU89IFUJfiapreAVAZNI242_HI_TD2y2muPOd-SMvPMeU68zDOp2txUfgw5Zs_F2L_-LDfPMvt29PLZr2VyZOTPnEy1gdOjnTJVGLnAFTwUaGnSIoi2GRD56MzmhJ2GEtnoZjgNBXWC7H6zeZjrnzo2o86HLmeWoT25679f6e_AOX5QLg</recordid><startdate>20160404</startdate><enddate>20160404</enddate><creator>Cheng, Mandy M.</creator><creator>Humphreys, Kerry A.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20160404</creationdate><title>Managing strategic uncertainty</title><author>Cheng, Mandy M. ; Humphreys, Kerry A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c876-8cac4589ac673fe7fbd600298b2187b727b05c59d8b6437c1d1bfd50f49637fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Mandy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphreys, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Mandy M.</au><au>Humphreys, Kerry A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing strategic uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>Managerial auditing journal</jtitle><date>2016-04-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4/5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>512-534</pages><issn>0268-6902</issn><eissn>1758-7735</eissn><abstract>Purpose Strategic uncertainty from emerging threats and opportunities in the business environment can significantly impact managers’ abilities to successfully implement their business strategy. A key strategic control and governance mechanism designed to enable managers to respond to strategic uncertainty is a strategic performance measurement system, such as the balanced scorecard (BSC). This study aims to investigate whether strategic uncertainty is associated with the diversity and types of performance measures in a BSC, which are used by managers for various strategic control and governance purposes. Design/methodology/approach A survey of senior-level managers within strategic business units of Australian Stock Exchange listed organizations was conducted. Findings This study finds that the extent to which managers face strategic uncertainty is positively associated with performance measurement diversity. Further, managers faced with greater strategic uncertainty use performance measures relatively more to evaluate subordinates’ performance, communicate business strategy, track performance against targets, identify problem areas and guide future directions. Outcome measures are used to a greater extent for all five purposes, whereas leading measures are used more only for future-oriented purposes. Practical implications Strategic performance measurement systems, such as the BSC, can and are being used to provide managers with the information and control mechanisms necessary to meet the challenges associated with strategic uncertainty. Originality/value This study provides the first evidence on the relations between strategic uncertainty, performance measurement diversity and managers’ use of performance measures for five key purposes. Understanding these relations is important, as managers need to formulate appropriate responses to strategic uncertainty, to protect and create value by exploiting emerging opportunities and managing associated threats.</abstract><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1286</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-6902
ispartof Managerial auditing journal, 2016-04, Vol.31 (4/5), p.512-534
issn 0268-6902
1758-7735
language eng
recordid cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_MAJ-12-2015-1286
source ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
title Managing strategic uncertainty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A44%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-emerald&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20strategic%20uncertainty&rft.jtitle=Managerial%20auditing%20journal&rft.au=Cheng,%20Mandy%20M.&rft.date=2016-04-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4/5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=512-534&rft.issn=0268-6902&rft.eissn=1758-7735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1286&rft_dat=%3Cemerald%3E10.1108/MAJ-12-2015-1286%3C/emerald%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c876-8cac4589ac673fe7fbd600298b2187b727b05c59d8b6437c1d1bfd50f49637fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true