Loading…
Analogical reasoning guidelines: a review and application to sustainable supply chains
Purpose This paper aims to review analogical reasoning work to distil and apply procedural guidelines that aid theoreticians to develop novel analogies. Design/methodology/approach The authors reviewed 189 studies from 1980 to 2020 to identify analogical reasoning guidelines. Findings Results reveal...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Supply chain management 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.153-173 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33 |
| container_end_page | 173 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 153 |
| container_title | Supply chain management |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Gruner, Richard L Power, Damien |
| description | Purpose
This paper aims to review analogical reasoning work to distil and apply procedural guidelines that aid theoreticians to develop novel analogies.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors reviewed 189 studies from 1980 to 2020 to identify analogical reasoning guidelines.
Findings
Results revealed four procedural steps for the introduction of novel analogies: target and source domain selection; domain image mapping; relevance assessment; and proposition drafting. […] shallow lakes constitute the source domain and sustainable supply chain management represents the target domain.
Research limitations/implications
The identified procedural guidelines can help future scholars to develop novel analogies with rigor and structure. The paper provides an agenda for new research that addresses gaps in current studies that reason by analogy.
Originality/value
This paper distils and applies analogical reasoning guidelines for the development of novel analogies, extending and complementing much existing theorizing on reasoning by analogy. Additionally, disjointed and fragmented research findings are synthesized to yield a comprehensive understanding of analogical reasoning, which can serve as a foundation for future theorizing in sustainable supply chain management and beyond. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1108/SCM-12-2019-0450 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_SCM-12-2019-0450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2532930481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw52iJs6nXj8ThVlW8pCIOPK6Wk9jBVZoEOwH13-OqXJA47Wh2ZqX9ELoEeg1A1eJl9USAEUahIFRIeoRmkEtFMiXZcdJcFkRJkZ2isxg3lFIQwGbofdmZtm98ZVocrIl957sGN5Ovbes7G2-wSf6Xt9_YdDU2w9Cm7Oj7Do89jlMcje9M2dqk026Hq49kxHN04kwb7cXvnKO3u9vX1QNZP98_rpZrUnHJR2KgpLzmQlornRHOqlq4EpytaqdyUZZ5ZTkUeSZBKpoxXtBCOFcWnLMic5zP0dXh7hD6z8nGUW_6KaSXomYyZTgVClKKHlJV6GMM1ukh-K0JOw1U7-npRE8D03t6ek8vVRaHit3aYNr6v8Yf3vwHxf9xKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2532930481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analogical reasoning guidelines: a review and application to sustainable supply chains</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Gruner, Richard L ; Power, Damien</creator><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Richard L ; Power, Damien</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
This paper aims to review analogical reasoning work to distil and apply procedural guidelines that aid theoreticians to develop novel analogies.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors reviewed 189 studies from 1980 to 2020 to identify analogical reasoning guidelines.
Findings
Results revealed four procedural steps for the introduction of novel analogies: target and source domain selection; domain image mapping; relevance assessment; and proposition drafting. […] shallow lakes constitute the source domain and sustainable supply chain management represents the target domain.
Research limitations/implications
The identified procedural guidelines can help future scholars to develop novel analogies with rigor and structure. The paper provides an agenda for new research that addresses gaps in current studies that reason by analogy.
Originality/value
This paper distils and applies analogical reasoning guidelines for the development of novel analogies, extending and complementing much existing theorizing on reasoning by analogy. Additionally, disjointed and fragmented research findings are synthesized to yield a comprehensive understanding of analogical reasoning, which can serve as a foundation for future theorizing in sustainable supply chain management and beyond.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-8546</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/SCM-12-2019-0450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Analogies ; Circular economy ; Cognition & reasoning ; Domains ; Guidelines ; Reasoning ; Supply chain management ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Supply chain management, 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.153-173</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2532930481?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Damien</creatorcontrib><title>Analogical reasoning guidelines: a review and application to sustainable supply chains</title><title>Supply chain management</title><description>Purpose
This paper aims to review analogical reasoning work to distil and apply procedural guidelines that aid theoreticians to develop novel analogies.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors reviewed 189 studies from 1980 to 2020 to identify analogical reasoning guidelines.
Findings
Results revealed four procedural steps for the introduction of novel analogies: target and source domain selection; domain image mapping; relevance assessment; and proposition drafting. […] shallow lakes constitute the source domain and sustainable supply chain management represents the target domain.
Research limitations/implications
The identified procedural guidelines can help future scholars to develop novel analogies with rigor and structure. The paper provides an agenda for new research that addresses gaps in current studies that reason by analogy.
Originality/value
This paper distils and applies analogical reasoning guidelines for the development of novel analogies, extending and complementing much existing theorizing on reasoning by analogy. Additionally, disjointed and fragmented research findings are synthesized to yield a comprehensive understanding of analogical reasoning, which can serve as a foundation for future theorizing in sustainable supply chain management and beyond.</description><subject>Analogies</subject><subject>Circular economy</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>1359-8546</issn><issn>1758-6852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw52iJs6nXj8ThVlW8pCIOPK6Wk9jBVZoEOwH13-OqXJA47Wh2ZqX9ELoEeg1A1eJl9USAEUahIFRIeoRmkEtFMiXZcdJcFkRJkZ2isxg3lFIQwGbofdmZtm98ZVocrIl957sGN5Ovbes7G2-wSf6Xt9_YdDU2w9Cm7Oj7Do89jlMcje9M2dqk026Hq49kxHN04kwb7cXvnKO3u9vX1QNZP98_rpZrUnHJR2KgpLzmQlornRHOqlq4EpytaqdyUZZ5ZTkUeSZBKpoxXtBCOFcWnLMic5zP0dXh7hD6z8nGUW_6KaSXomYyZTgVClKKHlJV6GMM1ukh-K0JOw1U7-npRE8D03t6ek8vVRaHit3aYNr6v8Yf3vwHxf9xKA</recordid><startdate>20210210</startdate><enddate>20210210</enddate><creator>Gruner, Richard L</creator><creator>Power, Damien</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210210</creationdate><title>Analogical reasoning guidelines: a review and application to sustainable supply chains</title><author>Gruner, Richard L ; Power, Damien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analogies</topic><topic>Circular economy</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gruner, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, Damien</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Supply chain management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gruner, Richard L</au><au>Power, Damien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analogical reasoning guidelines: a review and application to sustainable supply chains</atitle><jtitle>Supply chain management</jtitle><date>2021-02-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>153-173</pages><issn>1359-8546</issn><eissn>1758-6852</eissn><abstract>Purpose
This paper aims to review analogical reasoning work to distil and apply procedural guidelines that aid theoreticians to develop novel analogies.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors reviewed 189 studies from 1980 to 2020 to identify analogical reasoning guidelines.
Findings
Results revealed four procedural steps for the introduction of novel analogies: target and source domain selection; domain image mapping; relevance assessment; and proposition drafting. […] shallow lakes constitute the source domain and sustainable supply chain management represents the target domain.
Research limitations/implications
The identified procedural guidelines can help future scholars to develop novel analogies with rigor and structure. The paper provides an agenda for new research that addresses gaps in current studies that reason by analogy.
Originality/value
This paper distils and applies analogical reasoning guidelines for the development of novel analogies, extending and complementing much existing theorizing on reasoning by analogy. Additionally, disjointed and fragmented research findings are synthesized to yield a comprehensive understanding of analogical reasoning, which can serve as a foundation for future theorizing in sustainable supply chain management and beyond.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/SCM-12-2019-0450</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1359-8546 |
| ispartof | Supply chain management, 2021-02, Vol.26 (2), p.153-173 |
| issn | 1359-8546 1758-6852 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_emerald_primary_10_1108_SCM-12-2019-0450 |
| source | ABI/INFORM global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
| subjects | Analogies Circular economy Cognition & reasoning Domains Guidelines Reasoning Supply chain management Supply chains |
| title | Analogical reasoning guidelines: a review and application to sustainable supply chains |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analogical%20reasoning%20guidelines:%20a%20review%20and%20application%20to%20sustainable%20supply%20chains&rft.jtitle=Supply%20chain%20management&rft.au=Gruner,%20Richard%20L&rft.date=2021-02-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=153-173&rft.issn=1359-8546&rft.eissn=1758-6852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/SCM-12-2019-0450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2532930481%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-a1b03d345ee5fa4fe8d4fb1fecdf874bb7ce31976515806239094ffb933296f33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2532930481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |