Loading…
Comparing the Old and New 6th-8th Grades Mathematics Curricula in Terms of Van Hiele Understanding Levels for Geometry
This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the behaviors and attainments related to the plane geometry in the old and new 6th-8th grades mathematics curricula (MC) in terms of Van Hiele geometry understanding levels. With this purpose document analysis method was used. In the study, the leve...
Saved in:
Published in: | Procedia, social and behavioral sciences social and behavioral sciences, 2009, Vol.1, p.731 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 731 |
container_title | Procedia, social and behavioral sciences |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Yildiz, Cemalettin Aydin, Mehmet Kögce, Davut |
description | This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the behaviors and attainments related to the plane geometry in the old and new 6th-8th grades mathematics curricula (MC) in terms of Van Hiele geometry understanding levels. With this purpose document analysis method was used. In the study, the levels of behaviors and attainments in the old and new 6th-8th grades MC were determined according to Van Hiele theory. As a result of the study, it was found that although the number of attainments in the old mathematics curriculum related to plane geometry decreased in the new one, the percentage of levels of some of the topics was increased. Moreover it was found that both the old and new MC involve higher order behaviors and attainments for 6th grade such as deductive reasoning. [Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2009.] |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED589123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED589123</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED589123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED5891233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjLsKwkAQRRdRMKh_YDE_EDCJj1jHGAsfTbSVwUzMyu4mzK6Kf28ECztvcy-cy-kIL4gXC38yDePuz-6LkbW3SZsoiJZh6IlHUusGWZoruIrgoApAU8CenjB3lR-7CjLGgizssD1odPJiIbkzy8tdIUgDObG2UJdwQgMbSYrgaApi61rTR7ylBykLZc2QUa3J8WsoeiUqS6NvD8R4nebJxqfWe25YauTXOV3N4mUQRtEf_AZTCEhb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the Old and New 6th-8th Grades Mathematics Curricula in Terms of Van Hiele Understanding Levels for Geometry</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yildiz, Cemalettin ; Aydin, Mehmet ; Kögce, Davut</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Cemalettin ; Aydin, Mehmet ; Kögce, Davut</creatorcontrib><description>This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the behaviors and attainments related to the plane geometry in the old and new 6th-8th grades mathematics curricula (MC) in terms of Van Hiele geometry understanding levels. With this purpose document analysis method was used. In the study, the levels of behaviors and attainments in the old and new 6th-8th grades MC were determined according to Van Hiele theory. As a result of the study, it was found that although the number of attainments in the old mathematics curriculum related to plane geometry decreased in the new one, the percentage of levels of some of the topics was increased. Moreover it was found that both the old and new MC involve higher order behaviors and attainments for 6th grade such as deductive reasoning. [Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2009.]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0428</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0428</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Geometry ; Grade 6 ; Grade 7 ; Grade 8 ; Mathematics Curriculum ; Mathematics Skills</subject><ispartof>Procedia, social and behavioral sciences, 2009, Vol.1, p.731</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED589123$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Cemalettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kögce, Davut</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the Old and New 6th-8th Grades Mathematics Curricula in Terms of Van Hiele Understanding Levels for Geometry</title><title>Procedia, social and behavioral sciences</title><description>This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the behaviors and attainments related to the plane geometry in the old and new 6th-8th grades mathematics curricula (MC) in terms of Van Hiele geometry understanding levels. With this purpose document analysis method was used. In the study, the levels of behaviors and attainments in the old and new 6th-8th grades MC were determined according to Van Hiele theory. As a result of the study, it was found that although the number of attainments in the old mathematics curriculum related to plane geometry decreased in the new one, the percentage of levels of some of the topics was increased. Moreover it was found that both the old and new MC involve higher order behaviors and attainments for 6th grade such as deductive reasoning. [Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2009.]</description><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Mathematics Curriculum</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><issn>1877-0428</issn><issn>1877-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjLsKwkAQRRdRMKh_YDE_EDCJj1jHGAsfTbSVwUzMyu4mzK6Kf28ECztvcy-cy-kIL4gXC38yDePuz-6LkbW3SZsoiJZh6IlHUusGWZoruIrgoApAU8CenjB3lR-7CjLGgizssD1odPJiIbkzy8tdIUgDObG2UJdwQgMbSYrgaApi61rTR7ylBykLZc2QUa3J8WsoeiUqS6NvD8R4nebJxqfWe25YauTXOV3N4mUQRtEf_AZTCEhb</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Yildiz, Cemalettin</creator><creator>Aydin, Mehmet</creator><creator>Kögce, Davut</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>Comparing the Old and New 6th-8th Grades Mathematics Curricula in Terms of Van Hiele Understanding Levels for Geometry</title><author>Yildiz, Cemalettin ; Aydin, Mehmet ; Kögce, Davut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED5891233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Mathematics Curriculum</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Cemalettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kögce, Davut</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Procedia, social and behavioral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildiz, Cemalettin</au><au>Aydin, Mehmet</au><au>Kögce, Davut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED589123</ericid><atitle>Comparing the Old and New 6th-8th Grades Mathematics Curricula in Terms of Van Hiele Understanding Levels for Geometry</atitle><jtitle>Procedia, social and behavioral sciences</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>731</spage><pages>731-</pages><issn>1877-0428</issn><eissn>1877-0428</eissn><abstract>This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the behaviors and attainments related to the plane geometry in the old and new 6th-8th grades mathematics curricula (MC) in terms of Van Hiele geometry understanding levels. With this purpose document analysis method was used. In the study, the levels of behaviors and attainments in the old and new 6th-8th grades MC were determined according to Van Hiele theory. As a result of the study, it was found that although the number of attainments in the old mathematics curriculum related to plane geometry decreased in the new one, the percentage of levels of some of the topics was increased. Moreover it was found that both the old and new MC involve higher order behaviors and attainments for 6th grade such as deductive reasoning. [Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Sciences, 2009.]</abstract><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1877-0428 |
ispartof | Procedia, social and behavioral sciences, 2009, Vol.1, p.731 |
issn | 1877-0428 1877-0428 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED589123 |
source | BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS; ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Geometry Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Mathematics Curriculum Mathematics Skills |
title | Comparing the Old and New 6th-8th Grades Mathematics Curricula in Terms of Van Hiele Understanding Levels for Geometry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A16%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20Old%20and%20New%206th-8th%20Grades%20Mathematics%20Curricula%20in%20Terms%20of%20Van%20Hiele%20Understanding%20Levels%20for%20Geometry&rft.jtitle=Procedia,%20social%20and%20behavioral%20sciences&rft.au=Yildiz,%20Cemalettin&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=731&rft.pages=731-&rft.issn=1877-0428&rft.eissn=1877-0428&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EED589123%3C/eric%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED5891233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED589123&rfr_iscdi=true |