Loading…
Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change
This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associati...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of school psychology 2019-10, Vol.76, p.17-32 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033 |
container_end_page | 32 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Journal of school psychology |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Eddy, Colleen L. Herman, Keith C. Reinke, Wendy M. |
description | This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associations between coping and burnout and self-efficacy in comparison to the associations between stress and burnout and self-efficacy. Stress and coping items also predicted concurrent and future emotional exhaustion controlling for covariates; however, only coping consistently predicted additional variance in future emotional exhaustion with both stress and coping items in the model. Further, the coping item, not the stress item, demonstrated sensitivity to detect intervention effects; that is, teachers randomly assigned to receive a classroom management intervention (the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management program) had significantly higher coping scores compared to a wait-list comparison group. The results of this study provide support for the continued use of single-item stress and coping measures of teacher well-being, and areas for further research and potential use of these measures are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED626056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED626056</ericid><els_id>S0022440519300263</els_id><sourcerecordid>2333945161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotuFH4CEUKReuCT1R-wkcEJL-ZAq9QCcLa892zpKnGA7K_Xfd7a77YEDJ8vzPn49My8h7xitGGXqsq_6NFecsq6isqKUvSAr1jaiFJKql2RFKedlXVN5Rs5T6ikSkrPX5EywRna1kisy_PLhdoDSZxiLDMbeQSxSjpBSYYIr7DQjUIxg0oLFT8VmCnaJEUJ-1OcIztvs91DszeCdz_eP9QQheSwf7nkq7J0Jt_CGvNqZIcHb07kmf75d_d78KK9vvv_cfLkubU15LqWynXFNx1ol7FaoHQhunGk4Q91taxBWGc5qxXAOWvOOdTuu6lY5bpuWCrEm74--EL3Vc_Sjiff66qviikqF8sejPMfp7wIp69EnC8NgAkxL0hxtu4bJliN68Q_aT0sM2DxSQnS1ZNjFmrAjZeOUUoTd85-M6kNSuteYlD4kpanUmAO--XByXrYjuOcXT9Eg8Pk0BG5q7yHqZD0Ei_uOYLN2k_-P_QN8OaJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333945161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Eddy, Colleen L. ; Herman, Keith C. ; Reinke, Wendy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eddy, Colleen L. ; Herman, Keith C. ; Reinke, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associations between coping and burnout and self-efficacy in comparison to the associations between stress and burnout and self-efficacy. Stress and coping items also predicted concurrent and future emotional exhaustion controlling for covariates; however, only coping consistently predicted additional variance in future emotional exhaustion with both stress and coping items in the model. Further, the coping item, not the stress item, demonstrated sensitivity to detect intervention effects; that is, teachers randomly assigned to receive a classroom management intervention (the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management program) had significantly higher coping scores compared to a wait-list comparison group. The results of this study provide support for the continued use of single-item stress and coping measures of teacher well-being, and areas for further research and potential use of these measures are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31759465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Burnout ; Classroom management ; Classrooms ; Coping ; Elementary School Teachers ; Fatigue ; Intervention ; Measures (Individuals) ; Occupational stress ; Predictive validity ; Predictor Variables ; Scores ; Self Concept Measures ; Self Efficacy ; Sensitivity to change ; Single-item measures ; Stress Management ; Stress Variables ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Burnout ; Teacher stress and coping ; Teachers ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of school psychology, 2019-10, Vol.76, p.17-32</ispartof><rights>2019 Society for the Study of School Psychology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31759465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED626056$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eddy, Colleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Keith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinke, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change</title><title>Journal of school psychology</title><addtitle>J Sch Psychol</addtitle><description>This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associations between coping and burnout and self-efficacy in comparison to the associations between stress and burnout and self-efficacy. Stress and coping items also predicted concurrent and future emotional exhaustion controlling for covariates; however, only coping consistently predicted additional variance in future emotional exhaustion with both stress and coping items in the model. Further, the coping item, not the stress item, demonstrated sensitivity to detect intervention effects; that is, teachers randomly assigned to receive a classroom management intervention (the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management program) had significantly higher coping scores compared to a wait-list comparison group. The results of this study provide support for the continued use of single-item stress and coping measures of teacher well-being, and areas for further research and potential use of these measures are discussed.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Classroom management</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Predictive validity</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Self Concept Measures</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Sensitivity to change</subject><subject>Single-item measures</subject><subject>Stress Management</subject><subject>Stress Variables</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Burnout</subject><subject>Teacher stress and coping</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>0022-4405</issn><issn>1873-3506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotuFH4CEUKReuCT1R-wkcEJL-ZAq9QCcLa892zpKnGA7K_Xfd7a77YEDJ8vzPn49My8h7xitGGXqsq_6NFecsq6isqKUvSAr1jaiFJKql2RFKedlXVN5Rs5T6ikSkrPX5EywRna1kisy_PLhdoDSZxiLDMbeQSxSjpBSYYIr7DQjUIxg0oLFT8VmCnaJEUJ-1OcIztvs91DszeCdz_eP9QQheSwf7nkq7J0Jt_CGvNqZIcHb07kmf75d_d78KK9vvv_cfLkubU15LqWynXFNx1ol7FaoHQhunGk4Q91taxBWGc5qxXAOWvOOdTuu6lY5bpuWCrEm74--EL3Vc_Sjiff66qviikqF8sejPMfp7wIp69EnC8NgAkxL0hxtu4bJliN68Q_aT0sM2DxSQnS1ZNjFmrAjZeOUUoTd85-M6kNSuteYlD4kpanUmAO--XByXrYjuOcXT9Eg8Pk0BG5q7yHqZD0Ei_uOYLN2k_-P_QN8OaJQ</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Eddy, Colleen L.</creator><creator>Herman, Keith C.</creator><creator>Reinke, Wendy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change</title><author>Eddy, Colleen L. ; Herman, Keith C. ; Reinke, Wendy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Classroom management</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Predictive validity</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Self Concept Measures</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Sensitivity to change</topic><topic>Single-item measures</topic><topic>Stress Management</topic><topic>Stress Variables</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Burnout</topic><topic>Teacher stress and coping</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eddy, Colleen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Keith C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinke, Wendy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of school psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eddy, Colleen L.</au><au>Herman, Keith C.</au><au>Reinke, Wendy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED626056</ericid><atitle>Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change</atitle><jtitle>Journal of school psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Sch Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>76</volume><spage>17</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>17-32</pages><issn>0022-4405</issn><eissn>1873-3506</eissn><abstract>This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associations between coping and burnout and self-efficacy in comparison to the associations between stress and burnout and self-efficacy. Stress and coping items also predicted concurrent and future emotional exhaustion controlling for covariates; however, only coping consistently predicted additional variance in future emotional exhaustion with both stress and coping items in the model. Further, the coping item, not the stress item, demonstrated sensitivity to detect intervention effects; that is, teachers randomly assigned to receive a classroom management intervention (the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management program) had significantly higher coping scores compared to a wait-list comparison group. The results of this study provide support for the continued use of single-item stress and coping measures of teacher well-being, and areas for further research and potential use of these measures are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31759465</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4405 |
ispartof | Journal of school psychology, 2019-10, Vol.76, p.17-32 |
issn | 0022-4405 1873-3506 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED626056 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Anxiety Burnout Classroom management Classrooms Coping Elementary School Teachers Fatigue Intervention Measures (Individuals) Occupational stress Predictive validity Predictor Variables Scores Self Concept Measures Self Efficacy Sensitivity to change Single-item measures Stress Management Stress Variables Teacher Attitudes Teacher Burnout Teacher stress and coping Teachers Test Validity |
title | Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T13%3A08%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Single-item%20teacher%20stress%20and%20coping%20measures:%20Concurrent%20and%20predictive%20validity%20and%20sensitivity%20to%20change&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20school%20psychology&rft.au=Eddy,%20Colleen%20L.&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=17-32&rft.issn=0022-4405&rft.eissn=1873-3506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2333945161%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-56c9ad791863cb36fe32ada721c40db4e3c6a21461317042919f26486d2c78033%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333945161&rft_id=info:pmid/31759465&rft_ericid=ED626056&rfr_iscdi=true |