Loading…
Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior
The purpose of this study was to use an audience response system (ARS) to engage students in classroom discussions concerning sensitive and controversial topics (e.g., business ethics), assess students ethical orientation and conduct in unethical behaviors, and encourage reflection on their personal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.) Colo.), 2011-10, Vol.4 (10), p.9 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1377-1dc02776a30ac0e069b96f78ee9b7eccd3c57ed29fd8f5451c9d7242856c97b93 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Micheletto, Melinda J. |
description | The purpose of this study was to use an audience response system (ARS) to engage students in classroom discussions concerning sensitive and controversial topics (e.g., business ethics), assess students ethical orientation and conduct in unethical behaviors, and encourage reflection on their personal level of ethicality. Students used ARS devices to respond anonymously to questions regarding specific business-related ethical scenarios in a Principles of Marketing class. Students were asked six questions regarding their own conduct in certain behaviors and one question to evaluate their self-reported level of ethicality before the lecture/discussion and then again after the lecture/discussion. Nearly ninety-two percent of the students (n=65) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the beginning of the lecture/discussion and only seventy-three percent of the students (n=52) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the end of the lecture/discussion. The study showed that an ARS can be used to engage students in classroom discussion that results in significant student reflection on the topic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.19030/cier.v4i10.5970 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1072837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1072837</ericid><sourcerecordid>2496756101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1377-1dc02776a30ac0e069b96f78ee9b7eccd3c57ed29fd8f5451c9d7242856c97b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UE1rAjEQDaWFWtt7L4XQ-9pkd7PZHK3YLwShVegtxGRWI5q1ya7gv292LT3NzHtvHjMPoXtKRlSQjDxpC350zG0EmODkAg2oyGnCWfF92fckYWXOr9FNCFtCCi4oGyC_DNat8bg1FpwG_AnhULsA-OsUGtgHvKjx1Om69WodwaY14JqIrOO479qxM3Gp2oFubO3w3OFps7Fa7fDcR8tG9XCneoaNOtra36KrSu0C3P3VIVq-TBeTt2Q2f32fjGeJphnnCTWapJwXKiNKEyCFWImi4iWAWHHQ2mSacTCpqExZsZxRLQxP87RkhRZ8JbIhejj7grdaHrzdK3-S0w9KeFpmPPKPZ_7g658WQiO38U0XT5KCEC4EKzsROYu0r0PwUP0bUSL74GUXvOyDl13w2S952Xeq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900799587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Micheletto, Melinda J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Micheletto, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to use an audience response system (ARS) to engage students in classroom discussions concerning sensitive and controversial topics (e.g., business ethics), assess students ethical orientation and conduct in unethical behaviors, and encourage reflection on their personal level of ethicality. Students used ARS devices to respond anonymously to questions regarding specific business-related ethical scenarios in a Principles of Marketing class. Students were asked six questions regarding their own conduct in certain behaviors and one question to evaluate their self-reported level of ethicality before the lecture/discussion and then again after the lecture/discussion. Nearly ninety-two percent of the students (n=65) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the beginning of the lecture/discussion and only seventy-three percent of the students (n=52) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the end of the lecture/discussion. The study showed that an ARS can be used to engage students in classroom discussion that results in significant student reflection on the topic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1940-5847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-756X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.19030/cier.v4i10.5970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Littleton: The Clute Institute</publisher><subject>Anonymity ; Audience Response Systems ; Audiences ; Behavior ; Business Administration Education ; Business education ; Business ethics ; Classroom discussion ; Classroom response systems ; College students ; Decision making ; Ethical Instruction ; Ethics ; Experiential Learning ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning activities ; Marketing ; Measurement Techniques ; Pretests Posttests ; Reflection ; Student Attitudes ; Student participation ; Student Surveys ; Studies ; Teaching ; Teaching methods ; Topics ; Undergraduate Students ; United States (Northeast)</subject><ispartof>Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.), 2011-10, Vol.4 (10), p.9</ispartof><rights>Copyright Clute Institute for Academic Research Oct 2011</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1377-1dc02776a30ac0e069b96f78ee9b7eccd3c57ed29fd8f5451c9d7242856c97b93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/900799587/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/900799587?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,11668,21358,21374,27903,27904,33590,33856,36039,43712,43859,44342,62637,62638,62653,73942,73967,74143,74641</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1072837$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Micheletto, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><title>Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior</title><title>Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)</title><description>The purpose of this study was to use an audience response system (ARS) to engage students in classroom discussions concerning sensitive and controversial topics (e.g., business ethics), assess students ethical orientation and conduct in unethical behaviors, and encourage reflection on their personal level of ethicality. Students used ARS devices to respond anonymously to questions regarding specific business-related ethical scenarios in a Principles of Marketing class. Students were asked six questions regarding their own conduct in certain behaviors and one question to evaluate their self-reported level of ethicality before the lecture/discussion and then again after the lecture/discussion. Nearly ninety-two percent of the students (n=65) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the beginning of the lecture/discussion and only seventy-three percent of the students (n=52) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the end of the lecture/discussion. The study showed that an ARS can be used to engage students in classroom discussion that results in significant student reflection on the topic.</description><subject>Anonymity</subject><subject>Audience Response Systems</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Business education</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Classroom discussion</subject><subject>Classroom response systems</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ethical Instruction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning activities</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Topics</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>United States (Northeast)</subject><issn>1940-5847</issn><issn>1941-756X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UE1rAjEQDaWFWtt7L4XQ-9pkd7PZHK3YLwShVegtxGRWI5q1ya7gv292LT3NzHtvHjMPoXtKRlSQjDxpC350zG0EmODkAg2oyGnCWfF92fckYWXOr9FNCFtCCi4oGyC_DNat8bg1FpwG_AnhULsA-OsUGtgHvKjx1Om69WodwaY14JqIrOO479qxM3Gp2oFubO3w3OFps7Fa7fDcR8tG9XCneoaNOtra36KrSu0C3P3VIVq-TBeTt2Q2f32fjGeJphnnCTWapJwXKiNKEyCFWImi4iWAWHHQ2mSacTCpqExZsZxRLQxP87RkhRZ8JbIhejj7grdaHrzdK3-S0w9KeFpmPPKPZ_7g658WQiO38U0XT5KCEC4EKzsROYu0r0PwUP0bUSL74GUXvOyDl13w2S952Xeq</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Micheletto, Melinda J.</creator><general>The Clute Institute</general><general>Clute Institute</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior</title><author>Micheletto, Melinda J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1377-1dc02776a30ac0e069b96f78ee9b7eccd3c57ed29fd8f5451c9d7242856c97b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anonymity</topic><topic>Audience Response Systems</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Business education</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Classroom discussion</topic><topic>Classroom response systems</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ethical Instruction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning activities</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Topics</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>United States (Northeast)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Micheletto, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Micheletto, Melinda J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1072837</ericid><atitle>Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.)</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>9</spage><pages>9-</pages><issn>1940-5847</issn><eissn>1941-756X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to use an audience response system (ARS) to engage students in classroom discussions concerning sensitive and controversial topics (e.g., business ethics), assess students ethical orientation and conduct in unethical behaviors, and encourage reflection on their personal level of ethicality. Students used ARS devices to respond anonymously to questions regarding specific business-related ethical scenarios in a Principles of Marketing class. Students were asked six questions regarding their own conduct in certain behaviors and one question to evaluate their self-reported level of ethicality before the lecture/discussion and then again after the lecture/discussion. Nearly ninety-two percent of the students (n=65) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the beginning of the lecture/discussion and only seventy-three percent of the students (n=52) reported that they believed they were an ethical person at the end of the lecture/discussion. The study showed that an ARS can be used to engage students in classroom discussion that results in significant student reflection on the topic.</abstract><cop>Littleton</cop><pub>The Clute Institute</pub><doi>10.19030/cier.v4i10.5970</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1940-5847 |
ispartof | Contemporary issues in education research (Littleton, Colo.), 2011-10, Vol.4 (10), p.9 |
issn | 1940-5847 1941-756X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1072837 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; ProQuest One Literature; Education Collection |
subjects | Anonymity Audience Response Systems Audiences Behavior Business Administration Education Business education Business ethics Classroom discussion Classroom response systems College students Decision making Ethical Instruction Ethics Experiential Learning Learner Engagement Learning Learning activities Marketing Measurement Techniques Pretests Posttests Reflection Student Attitudes Student participation Student Surveys Studies Teaching Teaching methods Topics Undergraduate Students United States (Northeast) |
title | Using Audience Response Systems To Encourage Student Engagement And Reflection On Ethical Orientation And Behavior |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A13%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Audience%20Response%20Systems%20To%20Encourage%20Student%20Engagement%20And%20Reflection%20On%20Ethical%20Orientation%20And%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20issues%20in%20education%20research%20(Littleton,%20Colo.)&rft.au=Micheletto,%20Melinda%20J.&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=9&rft.pages=9-&rft.issn=1940-5847&rft.eissn=1941-756X&rft_id=info:doi/10.19030/cier.v4i10.5970&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2496756101%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1377-1dc02776a30ac0e069b96f78ee9b7eccd3c57ed29fd8f5451c9d7242856c97b93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900799587&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1072837&rfr_iscdi=true |