Loading…

Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation

Literature can be a powerful resource for adolescents' psychosocial development, as it provides opportunities to experience the world through the perspectives of others and juxtapose these with one's own experiences. However, gaining access to these perspectives requires going beyond liter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the learning sciences 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.93-132
Main Authors: Sosa, Teresa, Hall, Allison H., Goldman, Susan R., Lee, Carol D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 93
container_title The Journal of the learning sciences
container_volume 25
creator Sosa, Teresa
Hall, Allison H.
Goldman, Susan R.
Lee, Carol D.
description Literature can be a powerful resource for adolescents' psychosocial development, as it provides opportunities to experience the world through the perspectives of others and juxtapose these with one's own experiences. However, gaining access to these perspectives requires going beyond literal words on the page to explore interpretive meanings. This mixed-methods case study addresses the need to better understand how adolescent students learn to interpret literary works. Specifically, 9th-grade students participated in a 5-week instructional module focused on symbolic interpretation and coming of age themes in texts with a variety of sources of complexity. The primary data sources were an intentional sample of classroom discussions and essays written before and after instruction. Analyses indicate that students learned to make interpretive claims around symbolism. Textual evidence to support these claims was evident in whole-class discussions but less so in the written essays. Students also struggled to reason about why evidence supported particular claims and how the interpretive claims were related to understanding the characters and their worlds. Discussion focuses on the value of symbolic interpretation as a starting point for engaging adolescents in interpretive practices but notes that developing facility with literary interpretation takes concerted effort over longer periods of time.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1091037</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1091037</ericid><jstor_id>43828390</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>43828390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEs9PqBSJDZuUGcd2nB0Vb1SJBbC2XNdpXSVxsRNQ_x5XKSCxYDUzvueOxjdJRghjBAGXCAwEBT4mgGyMSChQ2EuOkOUkKwSU-7GPTLaFDpPjEFYAwBDKo2RyYz5M7da2XaQvm2bmaqvTx7Yzfu1Npzrr2vR16V2_WKZTG5-V36QTv-gb0w7yaXJQqTqYs109Sd7ubl-vH7Lp8_3j9WSaacpJlyleKkIqUShChdKcVvM4IQKnhJVmpikgMka5UpBXusjnoPMyTrQsWcVIfpJcDHvX3r33JnSysUGbulatcX2QKAhnBFlRRPT8D7pyvW_jdRILLjgRgBApNlDauxC8qeTa2yb-TyLIbbDyO1i5DVbugo2-0eAz3uofz-1TzDNuLX71Veic_wFoLojIy63_atBtWznfqE_n67ns1KZ2vvKq1TbI_P8TvgClOJCy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768628010</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Sosa, Teresa ; Hall, Allison H. ; Goldman, Susan R. ; Lee, Carol D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sosa, Teresa ; Hall, Allison H. ; Goldman, Susan R. ; Lee, Carol D.</creatorcontrib><description>Literature can be a powerful resource for adolescents' psychosocial development, as it provides opportunities to experience the world through the perspectives of others and juxtapose these with one's own experiences. However, gaining access to these perspectives requires going beyond literal words on the page to explore interpretive meanings. This mixed-methods case study addresses the need to better understand how adolescent students learn to interpret literary works. Specifically, 9th-grade students participated in a 5-week instructional module focused on symbolic interpretation and coming of age themes in texts with a variety of sources of complexity. The primary data sources were an intentional sample of classroom discussions and essays written before and after instruction. Analyses indicate that students learned to make interpretive claims around symbolism. Textual evidence to support these claims was evident in whole-class discussions but less so in the written essays. Students also struggled to reason about why evidence supported particular claims and how the interpretive claims were related to understanding the characters and their worlds. Discussion focuses on the value of symbolic interpretation as a starting point for engaging adolescents in interpretive practices but notes that developing facility with literary interpretation takes concerted effort over longer periods of time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLSBE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Case Studies ; Classroom Communication ; Classroom discussion ; Content Analysis ; Difficulty Level ; Discussion ; Discussion (Teaching Technique) ; Essays ; Grade 9 ; High School Students ; Learning ; Learning Modules ; Literary Criticism ; Literary Devices ; Literary Genres ; Literature ; Mixed Methods Research ; Persuasive Discourse ; Pretests Posttests ; Symbolism ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the learning sciences, 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.93-132</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Taylor and Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/43828390$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/43828390$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31220,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1091037$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sosa, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Allison H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Susan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Carol D.</creatorcontrib><title>Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation</title><title>The Journal of the learning sciences</title><description>Literature can be a powerful resource for adolescents' psychosocial development, as it provides opportunities to experience the world through the perspectives of others and juxtapose these with one's own experiences. However, gaining access to these perspectives requires going beyond literal words on the page to explore interpretive meanings. This mixed-methods case study addresses the need to better understand how adolescent students learn to interpret literary works. Specifically, 9th-grade students participated in a 5-week instructional module focused on symbolic interpretation and coming of age themes in texts with a variety of sources of complexity. The primary data sources were an intentional sample of classroom discussions and essays written before and after instruction. Analyses indicate that students learned to make interpretive claims around symbolism. Textual evidence to support these claims was evident in whole-class discussions but less so in the written essays. Students also struggled to reason about why evidence supported particular claims and how the interpretive claims were related to understanding the characters and their worlds. Discussion focuses on the value of symbolic interpretation as a starting point for engaging adolescents in interpretive practices but notes that developing facility with literary interpretation takes concerted effort over longer periods of time.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Classroom Communication</subject><subject>Classroom discussion</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Discussion</subject><subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Grade 9</subject><subject>High School Students</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Modules</subject><subject>Literary Criticism</subject><subject>Literary Devices</subject><subject>Literary Genres</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1050-8406</issn><issn>1532-7809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEs9PqBSJDZuUGcd2nB0Vb1SJBbC2XNdpXSVxsRNQ_x5XKSCxYDUzvueOxjdJRghjBAGXCAwEBT4mgGyMSChQ2EuOkOUkKwSU-7GPTLaFDpPjEFYAwBDKo2RyYz5M7da2XaQvm2bmaqvTx7Yzfu1Npzrr2vR16V2_WKZTG5-V36QTv-gb0w7yaXJQqTqYs109Sd7ubl-vH7Lp8_3j9WSaacpJlyleKkIqUShChdKcVvM4IQKnhJVmpikgMka5UpBXusjnoPMyTrQsWcVIfpJcDHvX3r33JnSysUGbulatcX2QKAhnBFlRRPT8D7pyvW_jdRILLjgRgBApNlDauxC8qeTa2yb-TyLIbbDyO1i5DVbugo2-0eAz3uofz-1TzDNuLX71Veic_wFoLojIy63_atBtWznfqE_n67ns1KZ2vvKq1TbI_P8TvgClOJCy</recordid><startdate>20160102</startdate><enddate>20160102</enddate><creator>Sosa, Teresa</creator><creator>Hall, Allison H.</creator><creator>Goldman, Susan R.</creator><creator>Lee, Carol D.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160102</creationdate><title>Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation</title><author>Sosa, Teresa ; Hall, Allison H. ; Goldman, Susan R. ; Lee, Carol D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Classroom Communication</topic><topic>Classroom discussion</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Discussion</topic><topic>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Grade 9</topic><topic>High School Students</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Modules</topic><topic>Literary Criticism</topic><topic>Literary Devices</topic><topic>Literary Genres</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sosa, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Allison H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldman, Susan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Carol D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sosa, Teresa</au><au>Hall, Allison H.</au><au>Goldman, Susan R.</au><au>Lee, Carol D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1091037</ericid><atitle>Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle><date>2016-01-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>93-132</pages><issn>1050-8406</issn><eissn>1532-7809</eissn><coden>JLSBE3</coden><abstract>Literature can be a powerful resource for adolescents' psychosocial development, as it provides opportunities to experience the world through the perspectives of others and juxtapose these with one's own experiences. However, gaining access to these perspectives requires going beyond literal words on the page to explore interpretive meanings. This mixed-methods case study addresses the need to better understand how adolescent students learn to interpret literary works. Specifically, 9th-grade students participated in a 5-week instructional module focused on symbolic interpretation and coming of age themes in texts with a variety of sources of complexity. The primary data sources were an intentional sample of classroom discussions and essays written before and after instruction. Analyses indicate that students learned to make interpretive claims around symbolism. Textual evidence to support these claims was evident in whole-class discussions but less so in the written essays. Students also struggled to reason about why evidence supported particular claims and how the interpretive claims were related to understanding the characters and their worlds. Discussion focuses on the value of symbolic interpretation as a starting point for engaging adolescents in interpretive practices but notes that developing facility with literary interpretation takes concerted effort over longer periods of time.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040</doi><tpages>40</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-8406
ispartof The Journal of the learning sciences, 2016-01, Vol.25 (1), p.93-132
issn 1050-8406
1532-7809
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1091037
source Taylor & Francis; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; ERIC
subjects Adolescents
Case Studies
Classroom Communication
Classroom discussion
Content Analysis
Difficulty Level
Discussion
Discussion (Teaching Technique)
Essays
Grade 9
High School Students
Learning
Learning Modules
Literary Criticism
Literary Devices
Literary Genres
Literature
Mixed Methods Research
Persuasive Discourse
Pretests Posttests
Symbolism
Teaching Methods
title Developing Symbolic Interpretation Through Literary Argumentation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A09%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20Symbolic%20Interpretation%20Through%20Literary%20Argumentation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20learning%20sciences&rft.au=Sosa,%20Teresa&rft.date=2016-01-02&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=93-132&rft.issn=1050-8406&rft.eissn=1532-7809&rft.coden=JLSBE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_eric_%3E43828390%3C/jstor_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a69a22f87a248ac64fd2f811064259ebc40115546aa03fc73d0c396aa4995f523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768628010&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1091037&rft_jstor_id=43828390&rfr_iscdi=true