Loading…

Addressing Measurement Issues Related to Bullying Involvement

In this article, we address measurement issues related to select aspects of bullying involvement with the goal of moving psychometrically sound measurement practices toward applied bullying research. We first provide a nontechnical introduction to psychometric considerations in measuring bullying in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:School psychology review 2015-12, Vol.44 (4), p.353-371
Main Authors: Casper, Deborah M., Meter, Diana J., Card, Noel A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253
container_end_page 371
container_issue 4
container_start_page 353
container_title School psychology review
container_volume 44
creator Casper, Deborah M.
Meter, Diana J.
Card, Noel A.
description In this article, we address measurement issues related to select aspects of bullying involvement with the goal of moving psychometrically sound measurement practices toward applied bullying research. We first provide a nontechnical introduction to psychometric considerations in measuring bullying involvement, highlighting the importance of establishing measurement equivalence across contexts and intervention conditions. We then discuss different forms of data collection for antibullying-intervention evaluation, interinformant agreement, and benefits of using information from multiple reporters. In the third section, we address the importance of using valid and reliable measures of the different forms of bullying, particularly when measuring bullying involvement across development. Finally, we advocate for studying the larger peer ecology by capturing the different ways in which youth actively or passively participate in bullying incidents. We conclude with a brief consideration of how psychometrically sound measurement of bullying involvement can inform the development of appropriate, effective, evidence-based bullying interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.17105/spr-15-0036.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1141614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A445737480</galeid><ericid>EJ1141614</ericid><sourcerecordid>A445737480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVJoI7Ta2-FhZzX0ehjtTr04Jq0dXAIhBZ6E7KkNWu0K0dap_jfR7ZDQ8ANcxiYed6ZYV6EPgOegADMr9MmlsBLjGk1gQ9oRKggpayqP2dohImQZYWBf0QXKa1xhigjI_R1am10KbX9qrhzOm2j61w_FPOUti4VD87rwdliCMW3rfe7PTbvn4J_OmCX6LzRPrlPL3mMfn-_-TX7WS7uf8xn00VpGGNDSWmDScUEg2rJiaY1qbBdgpTgKIVGMCuWAgtLBKc1l9owShpdV9JKIyjhdIyujnM3MTzmuwa1DtvY55UKhMA1MMnkK7XS3qm2b8IQtenaZNSUMS6oYDXOVHmCWrneRe1D75o2l9_wkxN8Duu61rwnMDGkFF2jNrHtdNwpwOrglMpOKeBq75SCLPhyFLjYmn_wzS1Afhiw3JfH_n557PTfEL1Vg975EJuoe9MmRf8z-xmk85_a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770814949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addressing Measurement Issues Related to Bullying Involvement</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Casper, Deborah M. ; Meter, Diana J. ; Card, Noel A.</creator><contributor>Rose, Chad A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Casper, Deborah M. ; Meter, Diana J. ; Card, Noel A. ; Rose, Chad A.</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we address measurement issues related to select aspects of bullying involvement with the goal of moving psychometrically sound measurement practices toward applied bullying research. We first provide a nontechnical introduction to psychometric considerations in measuring bullying involvement, highlighting the importance of establishing measurement equivalence across contexts and intervention conditions. We then discuss different forms of data collection for antibullying-intervention evaluation, interinformant agreement, and benefits of using information from multiple reporters. In the third section, we address the importance of using valid and reliable measures of the different forms of bullying, particularly when measuring bullying involvement across development. Finally, we advocate for studying the larger peer ecology by capturing the different ways in which youth actively or passively participate in bullying incidents. We conclude with a brief consideration of how psychometrically sound measurement of bullying involvement can inform the development of appropriate, effective, evidence-based bullying interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0279-6015</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2372-966X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2372-966X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17105/spr-15-0036.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Aggression ; Aggressiveness ; Bullying ; Intervention ; Measurement ; Measurement Techniques ; Methods ; Politics of Education ; Psychological tests ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Repetition ; Researchers ; Schools ; Social Status ; Studies ; Teaching Methods ; Validity ; Victimization ; Victims of Crime</subject><ispartof>School psychology review, 2015-12, Vol.44 (4), p.353-371</ispartof><rights>2015 by the National Association of School Psychologists 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright National Association of School Psychologists Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1770814949/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1770814949?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33854,43709,43856,73964,74140</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1141614$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Rose, Chad A.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Casper, Deborah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meter, Diana J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Card, Noel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Addressing Measurement Issues Related to Bullying Involvement</title><title>School psychology review</title><description>In this article, we address measurement issues related to select aspects of bullying involvement with the goal of moving psychometrically sound measurement practices toward applied bullying research. We first provide a nontechnical introduction to psychometric considerations in measuring bullying involvement, highlighting the importance of establishing measurement equivalence across contexts and intervention conditions. We then discuss different forms of data collection for antibullying-intervention evaluation, interinformant agreement, and benefits of using information from multiple reporters. In the third section, we address the importance of using valid and reliable measures of the different forms of bullying, particularly when measuring bullying involvement across development. Finally, we advocate for studying the larger peer ecology by capturing the different ways in which youth actively or passively participate in bullying incidents. We conclude with a brief consideration of how psychometrically sound measurement of bullying involvement can inform the development of appropriate, effective, evidence-based bullying interventions.</description><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Aggressiveness</subject><subject>Bullying</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Politics of Education</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social Status</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Victims of Crime</subject><issn>0279-6015</issn><issn>2372-966X</issn><issn>2372-966X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVJoI7Ta2-FhZzX0ehjtTr04Jq0dXAIhBZ6E7KkNWu0K0dap_jfR7ZDQ8ANcxiYed6ZYV6EPgOegADMr9MmlsBLjGk1gQ9oRKggpayqP2dohImQZYWBf0QXKa1xhigjI_R1am10KbX9qrhzOm2j61w_FPOUti4VD87rwdliCMW3rfe7PTbvn4J_OmCX6LzRPrlPL3mMfn-_-TX7WS7uf8xn00VpGGNDSWmDScUEg2rJiaY1qbBdgpTgKIVGMCuWAgtLBKc1l9owShpdV9JKIyjhdIyujnM3MTzmuwa1DtvY55UKhMA1MMnkK7XS3qm2b8IQtenaZNSUMS6oYDXOVHmCWrneRe1D75o2l9_wkxN8Duu61rwnMDGkFF2jNrHtdNwpwOrglMpOKeBq75SCLPhyFLjYmn_wzS1Afhiw3JfH_n557PTfEL1Vg975EJuoe9MmRf8z-xmk85_a</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Casper, Deborah M.</creator><creator>Meter, Diana J.</creator><creator>Card, Noel A.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>National Association of School Psychologists</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Addressing Measurement Issues Related to Bullying Involvement</title><author>Casper, Deborah M. ; Meter, Diana J. ; Card, Noel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Aggressiveness</topic><topic>Bullying</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Politics of Education</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social Status</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Victims of Crime</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casper, Deborah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meter, Diana J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Card, Noel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>School psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casper, Deborah M.</au><au>Meter, Diana J.</au><au>Card, Noel A.</au><au>Rose, Chad A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1141614</ericid><atitle>Addressing Measurement Issues Related to Bullying Involvement</atitle><jtitle>School psychology review</jtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>353-371</pages><issn>0279-6015</issn><issn>2372-966X</issn><eissn>2372-966X</eissn><abstract>In this article, we address measurement issues related to select aspects of bullying involvement with the goal of moving psychometrically sound measurement practices toward applied bullying research. We first provide a nontechnical introduction to psychometric considerations in measuring bullying involvement, highlighting the importance of establishing measurement equivalence across contexts and intervention conditions. We then discuss different forms of data collection for antibullying-intervention evaluation, interinformant agreement, and benefits of using information from multiple reporters. In the third section, we address the importance of using valid and reliable measures of the different forms of bullying, particularly when measuring bullying involvement across development. Finally, we advocate for studying the larger peer ecology by capturing the different ways in which youth actively or passively participate in bullying incidents. We conclude with a brief consideration of how psychometrically sound measurement of bullying involvement can inform the development of appropriate, effective, evidence-based bullying interventions.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.17105/spr-15-0036.1</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0279-6015
ispartof School psychology review, 2015-12, Vol.44 (4), p.353-371
issn 0279-6015
2372-966X
2372-966X
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1141614
source Social Science Premium Collection; ERIC; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list); Education Collection
subjects Aggression
Aggressiveness
Bullying
Intervention
Measurement
Measurement Techniques
Methods
Politics of Education
Psychological tests
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Repetition
Researchers
Schools
Social Status
Studies
Teaching Methods
Validity
Victimization
Victims of Crime
title Addressing Measurement Issues Related to Bullying Involvement
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A51%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addressing%20Measurement%20Issues%20Related%20to%20Bullying%20Involvement&rft.jtitle=School%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Casper,%20Deborah%20M.&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=353-371&rft.issn=0279-6015&rft.eissn=2372-966X&rft_id=info:doi/10.17105/spr-15-0036.1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA445737480%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-33f02647416b52a38260db1991e331f74d7b707d2753859ac432fa869d9c73253%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770814949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A445737480&rft_ericid=EJ1141614&rfr_iscdi=true