Effectiveness of Student's Note-Taking Activities and Characteristics of Their Learning Performance in Two Types of Online Learning

Aspects of learning behavior during two types of university courses, a blended learning course and a fully online course, were examined using note taking activity. The contribution of student's characteristics and styles of learning to note taking activity and learning performance were analyzed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of distance education technologies 2017-07, Vol.15 (3), p.47-64
Main Authors: Nakayama, Minoru, Mutsuura, Kouichi, Yamamoto, Hiroh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Achievement Gains
Analysis
Blended Learning
Cognitive Style
College Students
Colleges & universities
Computer assisted instruction
Content Analysis
Distance education
Distance learning
Electronic Learning
Intermode Differences
Learning
Learning Activities
Learning Strategies
Notetaking
Online Courses
Online education
Organizations
Performance Based Assessment
Student Characteristics
Student Surveys
Students
Universities
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243
container_end_page 64
container_issue 3
container_start_page 47
container_title International journal of distance education technologies
container_volume 15
creator Nakayama, Minoru
Mutsuura, Kouichi
Yamamoto, Hiroh
description Aspects of learning behavior during two types of university courses, a blended learning course and a fully online course, were examined using note taking activity. The contribution of student's characteristics and styles of learning to note taking activity and learning performance were analyzed, and the relationships between the two types of courses were compared using causal analysis techniques. In addition, lexical analysis of the contents of notes taken was introduced. Features of notes taken, such as the number of terms, the word ratios of student's notes and the degree of coverage of the lecturer's notes were compared. The results of the evaluation of the two types of learning styles were summarized by determining the relationships between student's characteristics and metrics of the contents of notes taken. The metrics were significantly different between the two learning styles. The contributions of students' characteristics to learning performance were also different. These results provide points to consider for the design and organization of the two types of learning.
doi_str_mv 10.4018/IJDET.2017070104
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1145222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759477777</galeid><ericid>EJ1145222</ericid><sourcerecordid>A759477777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1vFCEYxidGE2v17sVkEg96mZUXmA-Om-1a22xaE8czIezLljoLK7CanvuPl91pprGJcIDA73m_nqJ4D2TGCXRfLi7Plv2MEmhJS4DwF8UJ1ExUDEC8nO6EvC7exHhLCAXB2UlxvzQGdbJ_0GGMpTflj7Rfo0ufYnnlE1a9-mXdppwfGJssxlK5dbm4UUHphMHGZPVR19-gDeUKVXAHwXcMxoetchpL68r-ry_7ux0e0Ws3WIcT-7Z4ZdQQ8d3jeVr8_LrsF9-q1fX5xWK-qnRNmlRx2jKOxnSCN1Qj73gLHTRIOyEYEtCMCt3WNaXIlQEwDXaKqdynMi2hnJ0Wn8e4u-B_7zEmubVR4zAoh34fJYg8JdpwARn9-Ay99fvgcnWSCgY5Yy4mU7OR2qgBpXXGpzyVvNe4tdo7NDa_z9ta8PawsoCMAh18jAGN3AW7VeFOApEHG-XRRvlkY5Z8GCV51nrCl5cAPHdK8__5-G839qnIyVHpjXx0VEZ55f-XJ3c-jeefSM9BuVsb9gAllb0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2931899273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Student's Note-Taking Activities and Characteristics of Their Learning Performance in Two Types of Online Learning</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Nakayama, Minoru ; Mutsuura, Kouichi ; Yamamoto, Hiroh</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Minoru ; Mutsuura, Kouichi ; Yamamoto, Hiroh</creatorcontrib><description>Aspects of learning behavior during two types of university courses, a blended learning course and a fully online course, were examined using note taking activity. The contribution of student's characteristics and styles of learning to note taking activity and learning performance were analyzed, and the relationships between the two types of courses were compared using causal analysis techniques. In addition, lexical analysis of the contents of notes taken was introduced. Features of notes taken, such as the number of terms, the word ratios of student's notes and the degree of coverage of the lecturer's notes were compared. The results of the evaluation of the two types of learning styles were summarized by determining the relationships between student's characteristics and metrics of the contents of notes taken. The metrics were significantly different between the two learning styles. The contributions of students' characteristics to learning performance were also different. These results provide points to consider for the design and organization of the two types of learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-3100</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-3119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/IJDET.2017070104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Analysis ; Blended Learning ; Cognitive Style ; College Students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Computer assisted instruction ; Content Analysis ; Distance education ; Distance learning ; Electronic Learning ; Intermode Differences ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Learning Strategies ; Notetaking ; Online Courses ; Online education ; Organizations ; Performance Based Assessment ; Student Characteristics ; Student Surveys ; Students ; Universities</subject><ispartof>International journal of distance education technologies, 2017-07, Vol.15 (3), p.47-64</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 IGI Global</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2931899273/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2931899273?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11666,21356,21359,21372,27281,27900,27901,33587,33588,33853,33854,33882,33883,34111,36036,36037,43708,43855,43867,44338,74191,74366,74378,74864</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1145222$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutsuura, Kouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Hiroh</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Student's Note-Taking Activities and Characteristics of Their Learning Performance in Two Types of Online Learning</title><title>International journal of distance education technologies</title><description>Aspects of learning behavior during two types of university courses, a blended learning course and a fully online course, were examined using note taking activity. The contribution of student's characteristics and styles of learning to note taking activity and learning performance were analyzed, and the relationships between the two types of courses were compared using causal analysis techniques. In addition, lexical analysis of the contents of notes taken was introduced. Features of notes taken, such as the number of terms, the word ratios of student's notes and the degree of coverage of the lecturer's notes were compared. The results of the evaluation of the two types of learning styles were summarized by determining the relationships between student's characteristics and metrics of the contents of notes taken. The metrics were significantly different between the two learning styles. The contributions of students' characteristics to learning performance were also different. These results provide points to consider for the design and organization of the two types of learning.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Distance education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Intermode Differences</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Notetaking</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Performance Based Assessment</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1539-3100</issn><issn>1539-3119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1vFCEYxidGE2v17sVkEg96mZUXmA-Om-1a22xaE8czIezLljoLK7CanvuPl91pprGJcIDA73m_nqJ4D2TGCXRfLi7Plv2MEmhJS4DwF8UJ1ExUDEC8nO6EvC7exHhLCAXB2UlxvzQGdbJ_0GGMpTflj7Rfo0ufYnnlE1a9-mXdppwfGJssxlK5dbm4UUHphMHGZPVR19-gDeUKVXAHwXcMxoetchpL68r-ry_7ux0e0Ws3WIcT-7Z4ZdQQ8d3jeVr8_LrsF9-q1fX5xWK-qnRNmlRx2jKOxnSCN1Qj73gLHTRIOyEYEtCMCt3WNaXIlQEwDXaKqdynMi2hnJ0Wn8e4u-B_7zEmubVR4zAoh34fJYg8JdpwARn9-Ay99fvgcnWSCgY5Yy4mU7OR2qgBpXXGpzyVvNe4tdo7NDa_z9ta8PawsoCMAh18jAGN3AW7VeFOApEHG-XRRvlkY5Z8GCV51nrCl5cAPHdK8__5-G839qnIyVHpjXx0VEZ55f-XJ3c-jeefSM9BuVsb9gAllb0Q</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Nakayama, Minoru</creator><creator>Mutsuura, Kouichi</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Hiroh</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Student's Note-Taking Activities and Characteristics of Their Learning Performance in Two Types of Online Learning</title><author>Nakayama, Minoru ; Mutsuura, Kouichi ; Yamamoto, Hiroh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Distance education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Intermode Differences</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Notetaking</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Performance Based Assessment</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutsuura, Kouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Hiroh</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of distance education technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakayama, Minoru</au><au>Mutsuura, Kouichi</au><au>Yamamoto, Hiroh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1145222</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness of Student's Note-Taking Activities and Characteristics of Their Learning Performance in Two Types of Online Learning</atitle><jtitle>International journal of distance education technologies</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>47-64</pages><issn>1539-3100</issn><eissn>1539-3119</eissn><abstract>Aspects of learning behavior during two types of university courses, a blended learning course and a fully online course, were examined using note taking activity. The contribution of student's characteristics and styles of learning to note taking activity and learning performance were analyzed, and the relationships between the two types of courses were compared using causal analysis techniques. In addition, lexical analysis of the contents of notes taken was introduced. Features of notes taken, such as the number of terms, the word ratios of student's notes and the degree of coverage of the lecturer's notes were compared. The results of the evaluation of the two types of learning styles were summarized by determining the relationships between student's characteristics and metrics of the contents of notes taken. The metrics were significantly different between the two learning styles. The contributions of students' characteristics to learning performance were also different. These results provide points to consider for the design and organization of the two types of learning.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/IJDET.2017070104</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1539-3100
ispartof International journal of distance education technologies, 2017-07, Vol.15 (3), p.47-64
issn 1539-3100
1539-3119
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1145222
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); ABI/INFORM Global; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; ERIC; Education Collection
subjects Achievement Gains
Analysis
Blended Learning
Cognitive Style
College Students
Colleges & universities
Computer assisted instruction
Content Analysis
Distance education
Distance learning
Electronic Learning
Intermode Differences
Learning
Learning Activities
Learning Strategies
Notetaking
Online Courses
Online education
Organizations
Performance Based Assessment
Student Characteristics
Student Surveys
Students
Universities
title Effectiveness of Student's Note-Taking Activities and Characteristics of Their Learning Performance in Two Types of Online Learning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T12%3A36%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Student's%20Note-Taking%20Activities%20and%20Characteristics%20of%20Their%20Learning%20Performance%20in%20Two%20Types%20of%20Online%20Learning&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20distance%20education%20technologies&rft.au=Nakayama,%20Minoru&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=47-64&rft.issn=1539-3100&rft.eissn=1539-3119&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/IJDET.2017070104&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA759477777%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-42734eff89462ce48471816e28993e01c329c75522e4af11f6e8a3a194af70243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2931899273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A759477777&rft_ericid=EJ1145222&rfr_iscdi=true