Loading…

Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador

The recent application of Content and Language Integrated Learning programs in higher education provides an extensive area for research due to the quick implementation of English as the medium of instruction for university programs, as well as to the need of university students around the world to c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Latin American journal of content & language integrated learning 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.65-86
Main Authors: Argudo, Juanita, Abad, Mónica, Fajardo-Dack, Tammy, Cabrera, Patricio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title Latin American journal of content & language integrated learning
container_volume 11
creator Argudo, Juanita
Abad, Mónica
Fajardo-Dack, Tammy
Cabrera, Patricio
description The recent application of Content and Language Integrated Learning programs in higher education provides an extensive area for research due to the quick implementation of English as the medium of instruction for university programs, as well as to the need of university students around the world to communicate through English and to try different learning strategies and methodologies than the ones they used to work with. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) program at the University of Cuenca designed for students who wish to become EFL teachers complies with the principles of the Content and Language Integrated Learning approach. The 121 participants of this study were students from the fourth, fifth, and seventh semesters of the program. A general proficiency English test was administered to these students; some writing assignments to evaluate the development of Higher Order Thinking Skills were considered; and a survey to inquire about students’ perceptions on the development of language, content, and Higher Order Thinking Skills in their content subject classes was also applied. The findings revealed that 52% of the students are between A1 and A2 level according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages; this means that they do not have the necessary linguistic conditions to take content subjects. It seems that the parameters teachers used to plan their classes do not consider the three dimensions of this approach (content, language, and procedures); therefore, students are not developing these dimensions simultaneously.
doi_str_mv 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1190977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1190977</ericid><sourcerecordid>2126485970</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9LwzAQx4soOOb-AUEo-OJLay5N0uZxlKqTgoLuOaRpunV0zUzawfzrzTbxwXu5Xx_ujvsGwS2gmGJOHjupuraLMYIsBoghJhfBBCcYRzzFcOljBBAxH18HM-c2yFtGIUthEph5L7vDd9uvQhm-Wx19aLtvlQ6Lp9LnZmXlNhzW1oyrtfc6LHXvtAtNc8ryclGG893OGqnWoRxOxWXf7rV17XA4YvmoeyWjQo2yNvYmuGpk5_Ts10-D5VPxmb9E5dvzIp-XkcIMDVGaccTqmiheMQ0M07SWgKuKMl4TRmVNCE5kkzGeEAm04qxWKMOAk6ZuWMWSaXB3nqttq8TOtltpD6J4BeCIp6nvP5z7_vSvUbtBbFundNfJXpvRCQyUck5IRjx6_w_dmNH6tx0pzEhGeYo8hc-UssY5q5u_pYDEUSZxlkkcZRIAAgRJfgC4CYQP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2126485970</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Argudo, Juanita ; Abad, Mónica ; Fajardo-Dack, Tammy ; Cabrera, Patricio</creator><creatorcontrib>Argudo, Juanita ; Abad, Mónica ; Fajardo-Dack, Tammy ; Cabrera, Patricio</creatorcontrib><description>The recent application of Content and Language Integrated Learning programs in higher education provides an extensive area for research due to the quick implementation of English as the medium of instruction for university programs, as well as to the need of university students around the world to communicate through English and to try different learning strategies and methodologies than the ones they used to work with. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) program at the University of Cuenca designed for students who wish to become EFL teachers complies with the principles of the Content and Language Integrated Learning approach. The 121 participants of this study were students from the fourth, fifth, and seventh semesters of the program. A general proficiency English test was administered to these students; some writing assignments to evaluate the development of Higher Order Thinking Skills were considered; and a survey to inquire about students’ perceptions on the development of language, content, and Higher Order Thinking Skills in their content subject classes was also applied. The findings revealed that 52% of the students are between A1 and A2 level according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages; this means that they do not have the necessary linguistic conditions to take content subjects. It seems that the parameters teachers used to plan their classes do not consider the three dimensions of this approach (content, language, and procedures); therefore, students are not developing these dimensions simultaneously.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2011-6721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2322-9721</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bogota: The Latin American Journal of Content &amp; Language Integration Learning</publisher><subject>Bilingual education ; Bilingualism ; College Students ; Content and language integrated learning ; Course Content ; Critical thinking ; Educational Environment ; Educational standards ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language instruction ; English as a second language teaching methods ; English proficiency ; Foreign Countries ; Guidelines ; Higher education ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Language Acquisition ; Language of Instruction ; Language Proficiency ; Language Teachers ; Language Tests ; Learning Activities ; Learning Processes ; Learning Strategies ; Medium of instruction ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Program Descriptions ; Rating Scales ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language teachers ; Second language writing ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher education ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills ; Writing Assignments</subject><ispartof>Latin American journal of content &amp; language integrated learning, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.65-86</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9330-4622 ; 0000-0001-8381-5982 ; 0000-0002-3337-7803 ; 0000-0002-1741-8804</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2126485970/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2126485970?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12851,21378,21382,21394,25753,27924,27925,31220,31269,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,37012,37013,43733,43880,43896,44590,62661,62662,62664,62677,74196,74221,74397,74413,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1190977$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Argudo, Juanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fajardo-Dack, Tammy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera, Patricio</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador</title><title>Latin American journal of content &amp; language integrated learning</title><description>The recent application of Content and Language Integrated Learning programs in higher education provides an extensive area for research due to the quick implementation of English as the medium of instruction for university programs, as well as to the need of university students around the world to communicate through English and to try different learning strategies and methodologies than the ones they used to work with. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) program at the University of Cuenca designed for students who wish to become EFL teachers complies with the principles of the Content and Language Integrated Learning approach. The 121 participants of this study were students from the fourth, fifth, and seventh semesters of the program. A general proficiency English test was administered to these students; some writing assignments to evaluate the development of Higher Order Thinking Skills were considered; and a survey to inquire about students’ perceptions on the development of language, content, and Higher Order Thinking Skills in their content subject classes was also applied. The findings revealed that 52% of the students are between A1 and A2 level according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages; this means that they do not have the necessary linguistic conditions to take content subjects. It seems that the parameters teachers used to plan their classes do not consider the three dimensions of this approach (content, language, and procedures); therefore, students are not developing these dimensions simultaneously.</description><subject>Bilingual education</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Content and language integrated learning</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational standards</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language instruction</subject><subject>English as a second language teaching methods</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language of Instruction</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Medium of instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Program Descriptions</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language teachers</subject><subject>Second language writing</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><issn>2011-6721</issn><issn>2322-9721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9LwzAQx4soOOb-AUEo-OJLay5N0uZxlKqTgoLuOaRpunV0zUzawfzrzTbxwXu5Xx_ujvsGwS2gmGJOHjupuraLMYIsBoghJhfBBCcYRzzFcOljBBAxH18HM-c2yFtGIUthEph5L7vDd9uvQhm-Wx19aLtvlQ6Lp9LnZmXlNhzW1oyrtfc6LHXvtAtNc8ryclGG893OGqnWoRxOxWXf7rV17XA4YvmoeyWjQo2yNvYmuGpk5_Ts10-D5VPxmb9E5dvzIp-XkcIMDVGaccTqmiheMQ0M07SWgKuKMl4TRmVNCE5kkzGeEAm04qxWKMOAk6ZuWMWSaXB3nqttq8TOtltpD6J4BeCIp6nvP5z7_vSvUbtBbFundNfJXpvRCQyUck5IRjx6_w_dmNH6tx0pzEhGeYo8hc-UssY5q5u_pYDEUSZxlkkcZRIAAgRJfgC4CYQP</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Argudo, Juanita</creator><creator>Abad, Mónica</creator><creator>Fajardo-Dack, Tammy</creator><creator>Cabrera, Patricio</creator><general>The Latin American Journal of Content &amp; Language Integration Learning</general><general>Universidad de La Sabana</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-4622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-5982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-7803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-8804</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador</title><author>Argudo, Juanita ; Abad, Mónica ; Fajardo-Dack, Tammy ; Cabrera, Patricio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bilingual education</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Content and language integrated learning</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational standards</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language instruction</topic><topic>English as a second language teaching methods</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language of Instruction</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Medium of instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Program Descriptions</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language teachers</topic><topic>Second language writing</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Argudo, Juanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fajardo-Dack, Tammy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabrera, Patricio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Latin America &amp; Iberia Database</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Latin American journal of content &amp; language integrated learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Argudo, Juanita</au><au>Abad, Mónica</au><au>Fajardo-Dack, Tammy</au><au>Cabrera, Patricio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1190977</ericid><atitle>Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador</atitle><jtitle>Latin American journal of content &amp; language integrated learning</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>65-86</pages><issn>2011-6721</issn><eissn>2322-9721</eissn><abstract>The recent application of Content and Language Integrated Learning programs in higher education provides an extensive area for research due to the quick implementation of English as the medium of instruction for university programs, as well as to the need of university students around the world to communicate through English and to try different learning strategies and methodologies than the ones they used to work with. This study aimed to estimate the extent to which the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) program at the University of Cuenca designed for students who wish to become EFL teachers complies with the principles of the Content and Language Integrated Learning approach. The 121 participants of this study were students from the fourth, fifth, and seventh semesters of the program. A general proficiency English test was administered to these students; some writing assignments to evaluate the development of Higher Order Thinking Skills were considered; and a survey to inquire about students’ perceptions on the development of language, content, and Higher Order Thinking Skills in their content subject classes was also applied. The findings revealed that 52% of the students are between A1 and A2 level according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages; this means that they do not have the necessary linguistic conditions to take content subjects. It seems that the parameters teachers used to plan their classes do not consider the three dimensions of this approach (content, language, and procedures); therefore, students are not developing these dimensions simultaneously.</abstract><cop>Bogota</cop><pub>The Latin American Journal of Content &amp; Language Integration Learning</pub><doi>10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-4622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8381-5982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-7803</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-8804</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2011-6721
ispartof Latin American journal of content & language integrated learning, 2018-01, Vol.11 (1), p.65-86
issn 2011-6721
2322-9721
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1190977
source Social Science Premium Collection; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Education Collection
subjects Bilingual education
Bilingualism
College Students
Content and language integrated learning
Course Content
Critical thinking
Educational Environment
Educational standards
English (Second Language)
English as a second language instruction
English as a second language teaching methods
English proficiency
Foreign Countries
Guidelines
Higher education
Interdisciplinary Approach
Language Acquisition
Language of Instruction
Language Proficiency
Language Teachers
Language Tests
Learning Activities
Learning Processes
Learning Strategies
Medium of instruction
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Preservice Teacher Education
Program Descriptions
Rating Scales
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Second language teachers
Second language writing
Student Attitudes
Teacher education
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Thinking Skills
Writing Assignments
title Analyzing a Pre-Service EFL Program through the Lenses of the CLIL Approach at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A12%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20a%20Pre-Service%20EFL%20Program%20through%20the%20Lenses%20of%20the%20CLIL%20Approach%20at%20the%20University%20of%20Cuenca-Ecuador&rft.jtitle=Latin%20American%20journal%20of%20content%20&%20language%20integrated%20learning&rft.au=Argudo,%20Juanita&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=65-86&rft.issn=2011-6721&rft.eissn=2322-9721&rft_id=info:doi/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2126485970%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-78906dd4c9b6e16257da12bb569d465ad4423af86934a15b96dc082123fdf6b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2126485970&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1190977&rfr_iscdi=true