Reply to which post? An analysis of peer reviews in a high school SPOC

Peer review has been commonly applied to university-level online courses, but less at the high-school level. Little is known about high school students' tendencies when they give reviews to their peers, specifically which posts are more likely to receive reviews. This study adopted social netwo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Interactive learning environments 2020-07, Vol.28 (5), p.574-585
Main Authors: Wang, Mengqian, Guo, Wenge, Le, Huixiao, Qiao, Bo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Colleges & universities
Computer Mediated Communication
Content analysis
Discussion Groups
Feedback (Response)
Foreign Countries
high school
High School Students
Interaction
Interpersonal Competence
Interpersonal Relationship
Network analysis
Online Courses
online interaction
Peer Evaluation
Peer Relationship
Peer review
Peers
Persuasive Discourse
Regression analysis
Secondary schools
Small Classes
social network analysis
Social Networks
SPOC
Students
Time Management
Writing Evaluation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Peer review has been commonly applied to university-level online courses, but less at the high-school level. Little is known about high school students' tendencies when they give reviews to their peers, specifically which posts are more likely to receive reviews. This study adopted social network analysis, regression analysis and content analysis to investigate the structure of students' peer review network and tendency characteristics of peer reviews in a high school SPOC (small private online course). We report four findings: (1) Students' peer review networks appeared to be core-periphery structures; (2) Time is a major factor in that students who posted earlier in writing tasks were more likely to receive reviews from their peers. (3) Interpersonal skills significantly affect the number of peer reviews a student receives. In other words, the more reviews a student gives, the more likely that student is to receive reviews from others. (4) Students with assertive arguments and better interpersonal relationships with peers in offline situations received more reviews from others. These findings might provide insights for course designers and education practitioners to design peer review strategies in high school-level SPOCs.
ISSN:1049-4820
1744-5191
DOI:10.1080/10494820.2019.1696840