Loading…
Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students
Changing trends in educational technology are one of the driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation of students who have been surrounded...
Saved in:
Published in: | Electronic journal of e-Learning 2020-08, Vol.18 (4), p.347-356 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 356 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Electronic journal of e-Learning |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Magano, José Alves, Marta Durão, Rita de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz |
description | Changing trends in educational technology are one of the
driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher
Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently
justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation
of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the
moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to
use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There
have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this
assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny
this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit
from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies
are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not
so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and
social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so
proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology
adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article
intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses
the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and
adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education
Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students,
Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable
to determine their Behavioural Intention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1276338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1276338</ericid><sourcerecordid>2453907546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwARiQLPaE5z9x7LGq0kJVxEA7W47jlECIg50O_fakFCGme_fudMMPoVsCKeNEwUOxKtYphZTIlKcA-RmaEJ6rhHNg5__uS3QV4zsAZ0DkBC1mle-HxnfYdBXeRod9jYtqb83xaVq8cfat863fHfDG-zbi8oCfTfhwQ9Pt8Ouwr1w3xGt0UZs2uptfnaLtotjMH5P1y_JpPlsnlio-JJQK5ygoJRXLSklKR5UoRZXXmZV8tIwqqCUIA6VwuSMlUMkMy2ytLAjHpujutOtCY3Ufmk8TDrpYEZoLxuSY35_yPvivvYuDDq73YYia8owpyDMuxhI5lWzwMQZX_w0R0D809ZGmpqCJ1FyPNNk38Jlljw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2453907546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library & Information Science Collection</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Magano, José ; Alves, Marta ; Durão, Rita ; de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creator><creatorcontrib>Magano, José ; Alves, Marta ; Durão, Rita ; de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creatorcontrib><description>Changing trends in educational technology are one of the
driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher
Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently
justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation
of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the
moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to
use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There
have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this
assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny
this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit
from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies
are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not
so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and
social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so
proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology
adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article
intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses
the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and
adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education
Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students,
Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable
to determine their Behavioural Intention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-4403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-4403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited</publisher><subject>Business Administration Education ; Classrooms ; College Students ; Digital literacy ; Digital technology ; Distance learning ; Educational Environment ; Educational Practices ; Educational Strategies ; Educational Technology ; Experiential Learning ; Higher education ; Humanities ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Interactive learning ; Learning ; Learning management systems ; Marketing ; MOOCs ; Motivation ; Online instruction ; Pedagogy ; Social sciences ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Acceptance Model ; Technology adoption ; Technology Integration ; Technology Uses in Education ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Electronic journal of e-Learning, 2020-08, Vol.18 (4), p.347-356</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2453907546?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21498,21501,21514,25757,27924,27925,33614,33880,33909,37014,43733,43880,43892,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1276338$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magano, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durão, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creatorcontrib><title>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</title><title>Electronic journal of e-Learning</title><description>Changing trends in educational technology are one of the
driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher
Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently
justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation
of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the
moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to
use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There
have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this
assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny
this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit
from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies
are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not
so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and
social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so
proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology
adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article
intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses
the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and
adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education
Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students,
Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable
to determine their Behavioural Intention.</description><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Digital literacy</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning management systems</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>MOOCs</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology Integration</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1479-4403</issn><issn>1479-4403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwARiQLPaE5z9x7LGq0kJVxEA7W47jlECIg50O_fakFCGme_fudMMPoVsCKeNEwUOxKtYphZTIlKcA-RmaEJ6rhHNg5__uS3QV4zsAZ0DkBC1mle-HxnfYdBXeRod9jYtqb83xaVq8cfat863fHfDG-zbi8oCfTfhwQ9Pt8Ouwr1w3xGt0UZs2uptfnaLtotjMH5P1y_JpPlsnlio-JJQK5ygoJRXLSklKR5UoRZXXmZV8tIwqqCUIA6VwuSMlUMkMy2ytLAjHpujutOtCY3Ufmk8TDrpYEZoLxuSY35_yPvivvYuDDq73YYia8owpyDMuxhI5lWzwMQZX_w0R0D809ZGmpqCJ1FyPNNk38Jlljw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Magano, José</creator><creator>Alves, Marta</creator><creator>Durão, Rita</creator><creator>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creator><general>Academic Conferences International Limited</general><general>Academic Conferences Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</title><author>Magano, José ; Alves, Marta ; Durão, Rita ; de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Digital literacy</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning management systems</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>MOOCs</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology Integration</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magano, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durão, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Electronic journal of e-Learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magano, José</au><au>Alves, Marta</au><au>Durão, Rita</au><au>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1276338</ericid><atitle>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</atitle><jtitle>Electronic journal of e-Learning</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>347-356</pages><issn>1479-4403</issn><eissn>1479-4403</eissn><abstract>Changing trends in educational technology are one of the
driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher
Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently
justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation
of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the
moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to
use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There
have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this
assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny
this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit
from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies
are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not
so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and
social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so
proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology
adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article
intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses
the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and
adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education
Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students,
Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable
to determine their Behavioural Intention.</abstract><cop>Reading</cop><pub>Academic Conferences International Limited</pub><doi>10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1479-4403 |
ispartof | Electronic journal of e-Learning, 2020-08, Vol.18 (4), p.347-356 |
issn | 1479-4403 1479-4403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1276338 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ) |
subjects | Business Administration Education Classrooms College Students Digital literacy Digital technology Distance learning Educational Environment Educational Practices Educational Strategies Educational Technology Experiential Learning Higher education Humanities Integrated Learning Systems Interactive learning Learning Learning management systems Marketing MOOCs Motivation Online instruction Pedagogy Social sciences Students Teaching Methods Technology Acceptance Model Technology adoption Technology Integration Technology Uses in Education Variables |
title | Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adoption%20and%20Use%20of%20Educational%20Technology%20Tools%20by%20Marketing%20Students&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20journal%20of%20e-Learning&rft.au=Magano,%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=347-356&rft.issn=1479-4403&rft.eissn=1479-4403&rft_id=info:doi/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2453907546%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2453907546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1276338&rfr_iscdi=true |