Loading…

Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students

Changing trends in educational technology are one of the driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation of students who have been surrounded...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electronic journal of e-Learning 2020-08, Vol.18 (4), p.347-356
Main Authors: Magano, José, Alves, Marta, Durão, Rita, de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3
cites
container_end_page 356
container_issue 4
container_start_page 347
container_title Electronic journal of e-Learning
container_volume 18
creator Magano, José
Alves, Marta
Durão, Rita
de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz
description Changing trends in educational technology are one of the driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students, Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable to determine their Behavioural Intention.
doi_str_mv 10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1276338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1276338</ericid><sourcerecordid>2453907546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwARiQLPaE5z9x7LGq0kJVxEA7W47jlECIg50O_fakFCGme_fudMMPoVsCKeNEwUOxKtYphZTIlKcA-RmaEJ6rhHNg5__uS3QV4zsAZ0DkBC1mle-HxnfYdBXeRod9jYtqb83xaVq8cfat863fHfDG-zbi8oCfTfhwQ9Pt8Ouwr1w3xGt0UZs2uptfnaLtotjMH5P1y_JpPlsnlio-JJQK5ygoJRXLSklKR5UoRZXXmZV8tIwqqCUIA6VwuSMlUMkMy2ytLAjHpujutOtCY3Ufmk8TDrpYEZoLxuSY35_yPvivvYuDDq73YYia8owpyDMuxhI5lWzwMQZX_w0R0D809ZGmpqCJ1FyPNNk38Jlljw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2453907546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Magano, José ; Alves, Marta ; Durão, Rita ; de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creator><creatorcontrib>Magano, José ; Alves, Marta ; Durão, Rita ; de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creatorcontrib><description>Changing trends in educational technology are one of the driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students, Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable to determine their Behavioural Intention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-4403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-4403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reading: Academic Conferences International Limited</publisher><subject>Business Administration Education ; Classrooms ; College Students ; Digital literacy ; Digital technology ; Distance learning ; Educational Environment ; Educational Practices ; Educational Strategies ; Educational Technology ; Experiential Learning ; Higher education ; Humanities ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Interactive learning ; Learning ; Learning management systems ; Marketing ; MOOCs ; Motivation ; Online instruction ; Pedagogy ; Social sciences ; Students ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Acceptance Model ; Technology adoption ; Technology Integration ; Technology Uses in Education ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Electronic journal of e-Learning, 2020-08, Vol.18 (4), p.347-356</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2453907546?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21498,21501,21514,25757,27924,27925,33614,33880,33909,37014,43733,43880,43892,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1276338$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magano, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durão, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creatorcontrib><title>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</title><title>Electronic journal of e-Learning</title><description>Changing trends in educational technology are one of the driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students, Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable to determine their Behavioural Intention.</description><subject>Business Administration Education</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Digital literacy</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning management systems</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>MOOCs</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology Integration</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1479-4403</issn><issn>1479-4403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkD9PwzAUxC0EEqXwARiQLPaE5z9x7LGq0kJVxEA7W47jlECIg50O_fakFCGme_fudMMPoVsCKeNEwUOxKtYphZTIlKcA-RmaEJ6rhHNg5__uS3QV4zsAZ0DkBC1mle-HxnfYdBXeRod9jYtqb83xaVq8cfat863fHfDG-zbi8oCfTfhwQ9Pt8Ouwr1w3xGt0UZs2uptfnaLtotjMH5P1y_JpPlsnlio-JJQK5ygoJRXLSklKR5UoRZXXmZV8tIwqqCUIA6VwuSMlUMkMy2ytLAjHpujutOtCY3Ufmk8TDrpYEZoLxuSY35_yPvivvYuDDq73YYia8owpyDMuxhI5lWzwMQZX_w0R0D809ZGmpqCJ1FyPNNk38Jlljw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Magano, José</creator><creator>Alves, Marta</creator><creator>Durão, Rita</creator><creator>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creator><general>Academic Conferences International Limited</general><general>Academic Conferences Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</title><author>Magano, José ; Alves, Marta ; Durão, Rita ; de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business Administration Education</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Digital literacy</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning management systems</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>MOOCs</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology Integration</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magano, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durão, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Electronic journal of e-Learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magano, José</au><au>Alves, Marta</au><au>Durão, Rita</au><au>de Carvalho, Carlos Vaz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1276338</ericid><atitle>Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students</atitle><jtitle>Electronic journal of e-Learning</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>347-356</pages><issn>1479-4403</issn><eissn>1479-4403</eissn><abstract>Changing trends in educational technology are one of the driving forces behind many of the new educational strategies Higher Education Institutions are introducing. These changes are frequently justified with the “digital native” nature of the current generation of students who have been surrounded by digital technology from the moment they were born and are expected to also feel comfortable to use and adopt technological tools for their learning purposes. There have been many studies trying to assess the veracity of this assumption, but we still do not have enough data to confirm or deny this willingness and aptitude or even assess if students benefit from a technologically supported approach to learning. More studies are therefore necessary, in particular in subject areas that are not so connected to the technology, like humanities, economics, and social sciences, where students cannot be expected to be so proficient in the use of those tools and therefore their technology adoption process might be dependent of other variables. This article intends to contribute to this effort by presenting a study that uses the UTAUT model to assess which variables influence the use and adoption of educational technologies’ tools by Higher Education Marketing students. The result showed that, for these students, Social Influence (or Social Factors) was the most relevant variable to determine their Behavioural Intention.</abstract><cop>Reading</cop><pub>Academic Conferences International Limited</pub><doi>10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-4403
ispartof Electronic journal of e-Learning, 2020-08, Vol.18 (4), p.347-356
issn 1479-4403
1479-4403
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1276338
source Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Library & Information Science Collection; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
subjects Business Administration Education
Classrooms
College Students
Digital literacy
Digital technology
Distance learning
Educational Environment
Educational Practices
Educational Strategies
Educational Technology
Experiential Learning
Higher education
Humanities
Integrated Learning Systems
Interactive learning
Learning
Learning management systems
Marketing
MOOCs
Motivation
Online instruction
Pedagogy
Social sciences
Students
Teaching Methods
Technology Acceptance Model
Technology adoption
Technology Integration
Technology Uses in Education
Variables
title Adoption and Use of Educational Technology Tools by Marketing Students
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adoption%20and%20Use%20of%20Educational%20Technology%20Tools%20by%20Marketing%20Students&rft.jtitle=Electronic%20journal%20of%20e-Learning&rft.au=Magano,%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=347-356&rft.issn=1479-4403&rft.eissn=1479-4403&rft_id=info:doi/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.4.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2453907546%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c294t-226ee20998935b81be296b6d7f5c841be3290f806a0b6e7e1b0283a35cf9c06e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2453907546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1276338&rfr_iscdi=true