Are the International Components of Global Learning Programs Ethical and Appropriate? Some Considerations Utilizing a Fair Trade Learning Framework

Educational approaches that emphasize engagement within community-based contexts in both domestic and international settings are widely recognized as high-impact pedagogical practices. However, the international components of global learning programs are increasingly being viewed through rigorous et...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of higher education outreach and engagement. 2022, Vol.26 (3), p.207
Main Authors: Gendle, Mathew H, Tapler, Amanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Best Practices
Costs
Criticism
Educational Benefits
Ethics
Global Approach
Global Education
International Cooperation
Outcomes of Education
Partnerships in Education
Service Learning
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 207
container_title Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.
container_volume 26
creator Gendle, Mathew H
Tapler, Amanda
description Educational approaches that emphasize engagement within community-based contexts in both domestic and international settings are widely recognized as high-impact pedagogical practices. However, the international components of global learning programs are increasingly being viewed through rigorous ethical lenses as the potential and actual harms of these initiatives have become more widely recognized. Six common criticisms of international components embedded within global learning programs are highlighted in this essay, along with responses and counterpoints to each. We assert that although each of these concerns warrants significant discussion, all six can be satisfactorily addressed using proactive and ethical strategies that are already employed in best-practice community-based global learning (CBGL) work.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1375349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1375349</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1375349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e92t-dc13856d483cf3f18dbd3393b258ca3e1fb5f32ebc39464ed497fcb3bc8f19a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0F1KAzEQB_B9ULDUHkHIBRaand3t5klKaWuloGB9LpNk0kZ3kyUJiF7DCxs_wHkZmD_zY5iLYsIbqMuWz6urYhbjyzwXiLat20nxuQzE0pnYziUKDpP1Dnu28sPoHbkUmTds23uZh3vC4Kw7scfgTwGHyNbpbFVO0Gm2HMfgx2Ax0S178gNlxEWrKfygkT0n29uP731kG7SBHQJq-lc3maQ3H16vi0uDfaTZX58Wh836sLor9w_b3Wq5L0lUqdSKQ9e0uu5AGTC801IDCJBV0ykE4kY2BiqSCkTd1qRrsTBKglSd4QIFTIubX5aCVcd8-YDh_bi-57DI_xLwBav1Ya0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are the International Components of Global Learning Programs Ethical and Appropriate? Some Considerations Utilizing a Fair Trade Learning Framework</title><source>Freely Accessible Social Science Journals</source><creator>Gendle, Mathew H ; Tapler, Amanda</creator><creatorcontrib>Gendle, Mathew H ; Tapler, Amanda</creatorcontrib><description>Educational approaches that emphasize engagement within community-based contexts in both domestic and international settings are widely recognized as high-impact pedagogical practices. However, the international components of global learning programs are increasingly being viewed through rigorous ethical lenses as the potential and actual harms of these initiatives have become more widely recognized. Six common criticisms of international components embedded within global learning programs are highlighted in this essay, along with responses and counterpoints to each. We assert that although each of these concerns warrants significant discussion, all six can be satisfactorily addressed using proactive and ethical strategies that are already employed in best-practice community-based global learning (CBGL) work.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-6102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Costs ; Criticism ; Educational Benefits ; Ethics ; Global Approach ; Global Education ; International Cooperation ; Outcomes of Education ; Partnerships in Education ; Service Learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement., 2022, Vol.26 (3), p.207</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1375349$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gendle, Mathew H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapler, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>Are the International Components of Global Learning Programs Ethical and Appropriate? Some Considerations Utilizing a Fair Trade Learning Framework</title><title>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.</title><description>Educational approaches that emphasize engagement within community-based contexts in both domestic and international settings are widely recognized as high-impact pedagogical practices. However, the international components of global learning programs are increasingly being viewed through rigorous ethical lenses as the potential and actual harms of these initiatives have become more widely recognized. Six common criticisms of international components embedded within global learning programs are highlighted in this essay, along with responses and counterpoints to each. We assert that although each of these concerns warrants significant discussion, all six can be satisfactorily addressed using proactive and ethical strategies that are already employed in best-practice community-based global learning (CBGL) work.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Educational Benefits</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Global Approach</subject><subject>Global Education</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Service Learning</subject><issn>1534-6102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0F1KAzEQB_B9ULDUHkHIBRaand3t5klKaWuloGB9LpNk0kZ3kyUJiF7DCxs_wHkZmD_zY5iLYsIbqMuWz6urYhbjyzwXiLat20nxuQzE0pnYziUKDpP1Dnu28sPoHbkUmTds23uZh3vC4Kw7scfgTwGHyNbpbFVO0Gm2HMfgx2Ax0S178gNlxEWrKfygkT0n29uP731kG7SBHQJq-lc3maQ3H16vi0uDfaTZX58Wh836sLor9w_b3Wq5L0lUqdSKQ9e0uu5AGTC801IDCJBV0ykE4kY2BiqSCkTd1qRrsTBKglSd4QIFTIubX5aCVcd8-YDh_bi-57DI_xLwBav1Ya0</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Gendle, Mathew H</creator><creator>Tapler, Amanda</creator><general>Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Are the International Components of Global Learning Programs Ethical and Appropriate? Some Considerations Utilizing a Fair Trade Learning Framework</title><author>Gendle, Mathew H ; Tapler, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e92t-dc13856d483cf3f18dbd3393b258ca3e1fb5f32ebc39464ed497fcb3bc8f19a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Educational Benefits</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Global Approach</topic><topic>Global Education</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Service Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gendle, Mathew H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tapler, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gendle, Mathew H</au><au>Tapler, Amanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1375349</ericid><atitle>Are the International Components of Global Learning Programs Ethical and Appropriate? Some Considerations Utilizing a Fair Trade Learning Framework</atitle><jtitle>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>207</spage><pages>207-</pages><issn>1534-6102</issn><abstract>Educational approaches that emphasize engagement within community-based contexts in both domestic and international settings are widely recognized as high-impact pedagogical practices. However, the international components of global learning programs are increasingly being viewed through rigorous ethical lenses as the potential and actual harms of these initiatives have become more widely recognized. Six common criticisms of international components embedded within global learning programs are highlighted in this essay, along with responses and counterpoints to each. We assert that although each of these concerns warrants significant discussion, all six can be satisfactorily addressed using proactive and ethical strategies that are already employed in best-practice community-based global learning (CBGL) work.</abstract><pub>Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education</pub><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-6102
ispartof Journal of higher education outreach and engagement., 2022, Vol.26 (3), p.207
issn 1534-6102
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1375349
source Freely Accessible Social Science Journals
subjects Best Practices
Costs
Criticism
Educational Benefits
Ethics
Global Approach
Global Education
International Cooperation
Outcomes of Education
Partnerships in Education
Service Learning
title Are the International Components of Global Learning Programs Ethical and Appropriate? Some Considerations Utilizing a Fair Trade Learning Framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-27T04%3A15%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20the%20International%20Components%20of%20Global%20Learning%20Programs%20Ethical%20and%20Appropriate?%20Some%20Considerations%20Utilizing%20a%20Fair%20Trade%20Learning%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20higher%20education%20outreach%20and%20engagement.&rft.au=Gendle,%20Mathew%20H&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=207&rft.pages=207-&rft.issn=1534-6102&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1375349%3C/eric%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e92t-dc13856d483cf3f18dbd3393b258ca3e1fb5f32ebc39464ed497fcb3bc8f19a93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1375349&rfr_iscdi=true