Loading…

Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2: More Different than Similar

The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2 (AGQ 3 x 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of psychoeducational assessment 2023-10, Vol.41 (7), p.764
Main Authors: Lopez, J, Johnson, C, Dai, L, Jones, M. H, Nodine, M, Cooper, D, Eckel, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 764
container_title Journal of psychoeducational assessment
container_volume 41
creator Lopez, J
Johnson, C
Dai, L
Jones, M. H
Nodine, M
Cooper, D
Eckel, S
description The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2 (AGQ 3 x 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/07342829231185854
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1391509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1391509</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1391509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e107t-533466fd7a89cd53746c17c11de61ea200d226ec062873ba5196c217a7fde2243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjMFKAzEURbNQsFY_wIWQHxjNSybJjLtSa1VGVKrr8kze2JRppmRiqX-vRVfncrgcxi5AXAFYey2sKmUla6kAKl3p8oiNDq44yBN2OgxrIUqhpRyx9QvmTCkOvG_5xOM2hx3xhjDFED_5wmFHA8fo-cStAu1oQzHzeY8df_2iIYc-RgyJuOJ7Lm_4U_-7b0PbUjoc8wojX4RN6DCdseMWu4HO_zlm73ezt-l90TzPH6aTpiAQNhdaqdKY1lusaue1sqVxYB2AJwOEUggvpSEnjKys-kANtXESLNrWk5SlGrPLvy6l4JbbFDaYvpezR1A1aFGrH1_zVJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2: More Different than Similar</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Lopez, J ; Johnson, C ; Dai, L ; Jones, M. H ; Nodine, M ; Cooper, D ; Eckel, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopez, J ; Johnson, C ; Dai, L ; Jones, M. H ; Nodine, M ; Cooper, D ; Eckel, S</creatorcontrib><description>The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2 (AGQ 3 x 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-2829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/07342829231185854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Comparative Analysis ; Factor Analysis ; Goal Orientation ; Structural Equation Models ; Student Motivation ; Surveys ; Test Validity ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 2023-10, Vol.41 (7), p.764</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0009-0006-7306-3477 ; 0000-0002-3694-9707</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1391509$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nodine, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckel, S</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2: More Different than Similar</title><title>Journal of psychoeducational assessment</title><description>The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2 (AGQ 3 x 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0734-2829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNotjMFKAzEURbNQsFY_wIWQHxjNSybJjLtSa1VGVKrr8kze2JRppmRiqX-vRVfncrgcxi5AXAFYey2sKmUla6kAKl3p8oiNDq44yBN2OgxrIUqhpRyx9QvmTCkOvG_5xOM2hx3xhjDFED_5wmFHA8fo-cStAu1oQzHzeY8df_2iIYc-RgyJuOJ7Lm_4U_-7b0PbUjoc8wojX4RN6DCdseMWu4HO_zlm73ezt-l90TzPH6aTpiAQNhdaqdKY1lusaue1sqVxYB2AJwOEUggvpSEnjKys-kANtXESLNrWk5SlGrPLvy6l4JbbFDaYvpezR1A1aFGrH1_zVJY</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Lopez, J</creator><creator>Johnson, C</creator><creator>Dai, L</creator><creator>Jones, M. H</creator><creator>Nodine, M</creator><creator>Cooper, D</creator><creator>Eckel, S</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7306-3477</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-9707</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2: More Different than Similar</title><author>Lopez, J ; Johnson, C ; Dai, L ; Jones, M. H ; Nodine, M ; Cooper, D ; Eckel, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e107t-533466fd7a89cd53746c17c11de61ea200d226ec062873ba5196c217a7fde2243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nodine, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckel, S</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychoeducational assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopez, J</au><au>Johnson, C</au><au>Dai, L</au><au>Jones, M. H</au><au>Nodine, M</au><au>Cooper, D</au><au>Eckel, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1391509</ericid><atitle>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2: More Different than Similar</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychoeducational assessment</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>764</spage><pages>764-</pages><issn>0734-2829</issn><abstract>The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2 (AGQ 3 x 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 x 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.</abstract><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/07342829231185854</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7306-3477</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-9707</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0734-2829
ispartof Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 2023-10, Vol.41 (7), p.764
issn 0734-2829
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1391509
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); ERIC
subjects Academic Achievement
Comparative Analysis
Factor Analysis
Goal Orientation
Structural Equation Models
Student Motivation
Surveys
Test Validity
Undergraduate Students
title Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 x 2: More Different than Similar
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T07%3A32%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20Adaptive%20Learning%20Scales%20and%20Achievement%20Goal%20Questionnaire%203%20x%202:%20More%20Different%20than%20Similar&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychoeducational%20assessment&rft.au=Lopez,%20J&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=764&rft.pages=764-&rft.issn=0734-2829&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/07342829231185854&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1391509%3C/eric%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e107t-533466fd7a89cd53746c17c11de61ea200d226ec062873ba5196c217a7fde2243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1391509&rfr_iscdi=true