Loading…

Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER

Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Open learning 2023-10, Vol.38 (4), p.315-330
Main Authors: Perifanou, Maria, Economides, Anastasios A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643
container_end_page 330
container_issue 4
container_start_page 315
container_title Open learning
container_volume 38
creator Perifanou, Maria
Economides, Anastasios A.
description Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1400982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1400982</ericid><sourcerecordid>2878924893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIATcKDg1t5lJXCml3lAKxX1IZxJNmU7GJIP0BXxuM7a6dJEb__fnnPMDcIrRBCOOrhApOMoxnRBESNooxZjtgRFmhciEyPk-GA1MNkCH4CiEFUKI5IyPwNeLVqH3tn2DH71qbNxcws51faP8z73Wa9XWcFh9UG8aOgMXunPBRuetDsN73ukWzuq-UtG6VjUJCK73VVLPF_PZ4uIaKhhiX2-ga2F8tz7q5NiVgQNyDA6MaoI-2Z1j8Ho3e50-ZM_z-8fp7XNWMVTGDDODhEGVoQQXOi_pUtdLkpcsqbxYYkRYRbTSRihSLtP4rC5FkWavSUELRsfgbPtt591Hr0OUq9RoajlIwksuCOOCJirfUpV3IXhtZOftWvmNxEgOicvfxOWQuNwlnnynW5_2tvrzzJ4wQ0hwkvSbrW5b4_xafTrf1DKqTeO88aqtbJD0_xLfvwyQlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878924893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Perifanou, Maria ; Economides, Anastasios A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perifanou, Maria ; Economides, Anastasios A.</creatorcontrib><description>Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harlow: Routledge</publisher><subject>Directories ; Educational Quality ; Educational Resources ; Institutional repositories ; Learning ; Multilingualism ; OER ; OER repositories ; Open Educational Resources ; Peer Acceptance ; Popularity ; Quality ; Quality Assurance ; SimilarWeb ; Usability ; Use Studies ; web analytics ; Web Sites</subject><ispartof>Open learning, 2023-10, Vol.38 (4), p.315-330</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,34134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1400982$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perifanou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Economides, Anastasios A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</title><title>Open learning</title><description>Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .</description><subject>Directories</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Institutional repositories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>OER</subject><subject>OER repositories</subject><subject>Open Educational Resources</subject><subject>Peer Acceptance</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>SimilarWeb</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Use Studies</subject><subject>web analytics</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><issn>0268-0513</issn><issn>1469-9958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIATcKDg1t5lJXCml3lAKxX1IZxJNmU7GJIP0BXxuM7a6dJEb__fnnPMDcIrRBCOOrhApOMoxnRBESNooxZjtgRFmhciEyPk-GA1MNkCH4CiEFUKI5IyPwNeLVqH3tn2DH71qbNxcws51faP8z73Wa9XWcFh9UG8aOgMXunPBRuetDsN73ukWzuq-UtG6VjUJCK73VVLPF_PZ4uIaKhhiX2-ga2F8tz7q5NiVgQNyDA6MaoI-2Z1j8Ho3e50-ZM_z-8fp7XNWMVTGDDODhEGVoQQXOi_pUtdLkpcsqbxYYkRYRbTSRihSLtP4rC5FkWavSUELRsfgbPtt591Hr0OUq9RoajlIwksuCOOCJirfUpV3IXhtZOftWvmNxEgOicvfxOWQuNwlnnynW5_2tvrzzJ4wQ0hwkvSbrW5b4_xafTrf1DKqTeO88aqtbJD0_xLfvwyQlQ</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Perifanou, Maria</creator><creator>Economides, Anastasios A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</title><author>Perifanou, Maria ; Economides, Anastasios A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Directories</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Institutional repositories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>OER</topic><topic>OER repositories</topic><topic>Open Educational Resources</topic><topic>Peer Acceptance</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>SimilarWeb</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Use Studies</topic><topic>web analytics</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perifanou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Economides, Anastasios A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis (Open access)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Open learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perifanou, Maria</au><au>Economides, Anastasios A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1400982</ericid><atitle>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</atitle><jtitle>Open learning</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>315-330</pages><issn>0268-0513</issn><eissn>1469-9958</eissn><abstract>Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .</abstract><cop>Harlow</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-0513
ispartof Open learning, 2023-10, Vol.38 (4), p.315-330
issn 0268-0513
1469-9958
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1400982
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor & Francis; ERIC
subjects Directories
Educational Quality
Educational Resources
Institutional repositories
Learning
Multilingualism
OER
OER repositories
Open Educational Resources
Peer Acceptance
Popularity
Quality
Quality Assurance
SimilarWeb
Usability
Use Studies
web analytics
Web Sites
title Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A28%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20quality,%20popularity,%20demand%20and%20usage%20of%20Repositories%20of%20Open%20Educational%20Resources%20(ROER):%20a%20study%20on%20thirteen%20popular%20ROER&rft.jtitle=Open%20learning&rft.au=Perifanou,%20Maria&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=315-330&rft.issn=0268-0513&rft.eissn=1469-9958&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2878924893%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878924893&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1400982&rfr_iscdi=true