Loading…
Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER
Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and anal...
Saved in:
Published in: | Open learning 2023-10, Vol.38 (4), p.315-330 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643 |
container_end_page | 330 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Open learning |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Perifanou, Maria Economides, Anastasios A. |
description | Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1400982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1400982</ericid><sourcerecordid>2878924893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIATcKDg1t5lJXCml3lAKxX1IZxJNmU7GJIP0BXxuM7a6dJEb__fnnPMDcIrRBCOOrhApOMoxnRBESNooxZjtgRFmhciEyPk-GA1MNkCH4CiEFUKI5IyPwNeLVqH3tn2DH71qbNxcws51faP8z73Wa9XWcFh9UG8aOgMXunPBRuetDsN73ukWzuq-UtG6VjUJCK73VVLPF_PZ4uIaKhhiX2-ga2F8tz7q5NiVgQNyDA6MaoI-2Z1j8Ho3e50-ZM_z-8fp7XNWMVTGDDODhEGVoQQXOi_pUtdLkpcsqbxYYkRYRbTSRihSLtP4rC5FkWavSUELRsfgbPtt591Hr0OUq9RoajlIwksuCOOCJirfUpV3IXhtZOftWvmNxEgOicvfxOWQuNwlnnynW5_2tvrzzJ4wQ0hwkvSbrW5b4_xafTrf1DKqTeO88aqtbJD0_xLfvwyQlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878924893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Perifanou, Maria ; Economides, Anastasios A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perifanou, Maria ; Economides, Anastasios A.</creatorcontrib><description>Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harlow: Routledge</publisher><subject>Directories ; Educational Quality ; Educational Resources ; Institutional repositories ; Learning ; Multilingualism ; OER ; OER repositories ; Open Educational Resources ; Peer Acceptance ; Popularity ; Quality ; Quality Assurance ; SimilarWeb ; Usability ; Use Studies ; web analytics ; Web Sites</subject><ispartof>Open learning, 2023-10, Vol.38 (4), p.315-330</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2022</rights><rights>2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,34134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1400982$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perifanou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Economides, Anastasios A.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</title><title>Open learning</title><description>Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .</description><subject>Directories</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Institutional repositories</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Multilingualism</subject><subject>OER</subject><subject>OER repositories</subject><subject>Open Educational Resources</subject><subject>Peer Acceptance</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>SimilarWeb</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>Use Studies</subject><subject>web analytics</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><issn>0268-0513</issn><issn>1469-9958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIATcKDg1t5lJXCml3lAKxX1IZxJNmU7GJIP0BXxuM7a6dJEb__fnnPMDcIrRBCOOrhApOMoxnRBESNooxZjtgRFmhciEyPk-GA1MNkCH4CiEFUKI5IyPwNeLVqH3tn2DH71qbNxcws51faP8z73Wa9XWcFh9UG8aOgMXunPBRuetDsN73ukWzuq-UtG6VjUJCK73VVLPF_PZ4uIaKhhiX2-ga2F8tz7q5NiVgQNyDA6MaoI-2Z1j8Ho3e50-ZM_z-8fp7XNWMVTGDDODhEGVoQQXOi_pUtdLkpcsqbxYYkRYRbTSRihSLtP4rC5FkWavSUELRsfgbPtt591Hr0OUq9RoajlIwksuCOOCJirfUpV3IXhtZOftWvmNxEgOicvfxOWQuNwlnnynW5_2tvrzzJ4wQ0hwkvSbrW5b4_xafTrf1DKqTeO88aqtbJD0_xLfvwyQlQ</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Perifanou, Maria</creator><creator>Economides, Anastasios A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</title><author>Perifanou, Maria ; Economides, Anastasios A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Directories</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Institutional repositories</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Multilingualism</topic><topic>OER</topic><topic>OER repositories</topic><topic>Open Educational Resources</topic><topic>Peer Acceptance</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>SimilarWeb</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>Use Studies</topic><topic>web analytics</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perifanou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Economides, Anastasios A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis (Open access)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Open learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perifanou, Maria</au><au>Economides, Anastasios A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1400982</ericid><atitle>Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER</atitle><jtitle>Open learning</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>315-330</pages><issn>0268-0513</issn><eissn>1469-9958</eissn><abstract>Open Educational Resources (OER) could be used by educators and learners for online teaching and learning. All over the world, various OER repositories and directories curate OER in various subjects. However, little is known about their quality, popularity and usage. This paper investigates and analyses qualitatively and quantitatively 13 well-known repositories of OER (ROER) from the users' point of view. The following web traffic analytics tools were used: Google MobileFriendly, Google PageSpeed Insights, OpenLink Profiler, SimilarWeb, and WAVE. Most of these ROER curate OER and links pointing to OER of multiple types, multiple languages, multiple disciplines (subjects), and multiple educational levels. Also, almost all of them provide mobile friendly design, some form of OER quality evaluation, and facilities so that anyone can search them for OER and their members can interact, communicate, and collaborate among themselves. However, most of them provide poor speed and their information about their OER does not always correspond to the reality. Most of these ROER have registered members and social media followers, and are well recognised by thousands of websites that point to them. Thousands of users visit these ROER. On average, visitors visit 3.6 pages and spend 2.6 minutes per visit in an ROER. .</abstract><cop>Harlow</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-0513 |
ispartof | Open learning, 2023-10, Vol.38 (4), p.315-330 |
issn | 0268-0513 1469-9958 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1400982 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor & Francis; ERIC |
subjects | Directories Educational Quality Educational Resources Institutional repositories Learning Multilingualism OER OER repositories Open Educational Resources Peer Acceptance Popularity Quality Quality Assurance SimilarWeb Usability Use Studies web analytics Web Sites |
title | Measuring quality, popularity, demand and usage of Repositories of Open Educational Resources (ROER): a study on thirteen popular ROER |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A28%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20quality,%20popularity,%20demand%20and%20usage%20of%20Repositories%20of%20Open%20Educational%20Resources%20(ROER):%20a%20study%20on%20thirteen%20popular%20ROER&rft.jtitle=Open%20learning&rft.au=Perifanou,%20Maria&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=315-330&rft.issn=0268-0513&rft.eissn=1469-9958&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02680513.2022.2033114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2878924893%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-14f09f0cf3216e573bedb257440786b1024c2eaef9a27b4694d796026d263643%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878924893&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1400982&rfr_iscdi=true |