Loading…
The Devil Is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement
For "civic engagement" work to have meaningful and long-term impact upon students, partners, and postsecondary institutions, each institution must undertake the difficult work of defining civic engagement for itself such that the definition aligns with the institution's educational mi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of higher education outreach and engagement. 2009, Vol.13 (2), p.59 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Journal of higher education outreach and engagement. |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Brabant, Margaret Braid, Donald |
description | For "civic engagement" work to have meaningful and long-term impact upon students, partners, and postsecondary institutions, each institution must undertake the difficult work of defining civic engagement for itself such that the definition aligns with the institution's educational mission and local context. We argue that civic engagement is inherently political and that definitional dilemmas have arisen from the conflation of the terms "service-learning" and "civic engagement." Here we present lessons we have learned from using service-learning to teach citizenship and applying essentially political definitions about "community" and how "citizens" should behave, and offer insights from an extended community-building project that we analyze for its revelations concerning universities' and communities' limited capacities for undertaking long-term civic engagement projects. We conclude by placing the problem of definition in a broader context of issues regarding cost and other limitations universities still need to consider to achieve and sustain civic engagement. (Contains 13 endnotes.) |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ905397</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ905397</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ905397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ9053973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDU20TUzNDDiYOAtLs4yAAJjSzMzEzNOBrOQjFQFl9SyzBwFz2KFzDyFEjC_JDEzp9gKyEjLzMvMS1dwzizLTFZwzUtPTE_NTc0r4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxrl6WBqbGlubGBKQBP8Qu8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Devil Is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Brabant, Margaret ; Braid, Donald</creator><creatorcontrib>Brabant, Margaret ; Braid, Donald</creatorcontrib><description>For "civic engagement" work to have meaningful and long-term impact upon students, partners, and postsecondary institutions, each institution must undertake the difficult work of defining civic engagement for itself such that the definition aligns with the institution's educational mission and local context. We argue that civic engagement is inherently political and that definitional dilemmas have arisen from the conflation of the terms "service-learning" and "civic engagement." Here we present lessons we have learned from using service-learning to teach citizenship and applying essentially political definitions about "community" and how "citizens" should behave, and offer insights from an extended community-building project that we analyze for its revelations concerning universities' and communities' limited capacities for undertaking long-term civic engagement projects. We conclude by placing the problem of definition in a broader context of issues regarding cost and other limitations universities still need to consider to achieve and sustain civic engagement. (Contains 13 endnotes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-6102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education</publisher><subject>Alignment (Education) ; Citizen Participation ; Citizenship ; Citizenship Education ; Context Effect ; Higher Education ; Indiana ; Institutional Mission ; Outreach Programs ; Partnerships in Education ; Service Learning</subject><ispartof>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement., 2009, Vol.13 (2), p.59</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ905397$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brabant, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braid, Donald</creatorcontrib><title>The Devil Is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement</title><title>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.</title><description>For "civic engagement" work to have meaningful and long-term impact upon students, partners, and postsecondary institutions, each institution must undertake the difficult work of defining civic engagement for itself such that the definition aligns with the institution's educational mission and local context. We argue that civic engagement is inherently political and that definitional dilemmas have arisen from the conflation of the terms "service-learning" and "civic engagement." Here we present lessons we have learned from using service-learning to teach citizenship and applying essentially political definitions about "community" and how "citizens" should behave, and offer insights from an extended community-building project that we analyze for its revelations concerning universities' and communities' limited capacities for undertaking long-term civic engagement projects. We conclude by placing the problem of definition in a broader context of issues regarding cost and other limitations universities still need to consider to achieve and sustain civic engagement. (Contains 13 endnotes.)</description><subject>Alignment (Education)</subject><subject>Citizen Participation</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Citizenship Education</subject><subject>Context Effect</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>Institutional Mission</subject><subject>Outreach Programs</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Service Learning</subject><issn>1534-6102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDU20TUzNDDiYOAtLs4yAAJjSzMzEzNOBrOQjFQFl9SyzBwFz2KFzDyFEjC_JDEzp9gKyEjLzMvMS1dwzizLTFZwzUtPTE_NTc0r4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxrl6WBqbGlubGBKQBP8Qu8g</recordid><startdate>2009</startdate><enddate>2009</enddate><creator>Brabant, Margaret</creator><creator>Braid, Donald</creator><general>Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2009</creationdate><title>The Devil Is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement</title><author>Brabant, Margaret ; Braid, Donald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ9053973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Alignment (Education)</topic><topic>Citizen Participation</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Citizenship Education</topic><topic>Context Effect</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>Institutional Mission</topic><topic>Outreach Programs</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Service Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brabant, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braid, Donald</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brabant, Margaret</au><au>Braid, Donald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ905397</ericid><atitle>The Devil Is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of higher education outreach and engagement.</jtitle><date>2009</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>59</spage><pages>59-</pages><issn>1534-6102</issn><abstract>For "civic engagement" work to have meaningful and long-term impact upon students, partners, and postsecondary institutions, each institution must undertake the difficult work of defining civic engagement for itself such that the definition aligns with the institution's educational mission and local context. We argue that civic engagement is inherently political and that definitional dilemmas have arisen from the conflation of the terms "service-learning" and "civic engagement." Here we present lessons we have learned from using service-learning to teach citizenship and applying essentially political definitions about "community" and how "citizens" should behave, and offer insights from an extended community-building project that we analyze for its revelations concerning universities' and communities' limited capacities for undertaking long-term civic engagement projects. We conclude by placing the problem of definition in a broader context of issues regarding cost and other limitations universities still need to consider to achieve and sustain civic engagement. (Contains 13 endnotes.)</abstract><pub>Office of the Vice President for Public Service and Outreach, University of Georgia and the Institute of Higher Education</pub><tpages>29</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-6102 |
ispartof | Journal of higher education outreach and engagement., 2009, Vol.13 (2), p.59 |
issn | 1534-6102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ905397 |
source | Freely Accessible Journals |
subjects | Alignment (Education) Citizen Participation Citizenship Citizenship Education Context Effect Higher Education Indiana Institutional Mission Outreach Programs Partnerships in Education Service Learning |
title | The Devil Is in the Details: Defining Civic Engagement |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Devil%20Is%20in%20the%20Details:%20Defining%20Civic%20Engagement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20higher%20education%20outreach%20and%20engagement.&rft.au=Brabant,%20Margaret&rft.date=2009&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=59&rft.pages=59-&rft.issn=1534-6102&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ905397%3C/eric%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ9053973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ905397&rfr_iscdi=true |