Loading…
Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research
As researchers seek to make sense of young people's online literacy practices and participation, questions of methodology are important to consider. In our work to understand the culture of physical, virtual and blended spheres that adolescents inhabit, we find it necessary to expand Gee's...
Saved in:
Published in: | English teaching : practice and critique 2012-07, Vol.11 (2), p.44 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | English teaching : practice and critique |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | C. Lammers, Jayne Curwood, Jen Scott Magnifico, Alecia Marie |
description | As researchers seek to make sense of young people's online literacy practices and participation, questions of methodology are important to consider. In our work to understand the culture of physical, virtual and blended spheres that adolescents inhabit, we find it necessary to expand Gee's (2004) notion of affinity spaces. In this article, we draw on our research examining adolescent literacies related to The Sims video games, The Hunger Games novels, and the Neopets online game to explicate nine features of affinity space research that reflect participation in, and research about, online environments. We argue that studying adolescent literacies in affinity spaces affords us access to participants outside our geographic proximity, readily available web-based historical record of the affinity spaces' practices, and a way to trace literacy practices across portals, modes and texts. However, affinity space research poses challenges, including issues of recruiting and maintaining relationships with participants, the instability and impermanence of online environments and artefacts, and the porous boundaries of field sites. This article concludes with recommendations for future literacy research conducted in online spaces and implications for literacy teaching and learning. Our aim is to begin articulating a new methodological framework for studying affinity spaces: affinity space ethnography. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ973940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ973940</ericid><sourcerecordid>2796971091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e204t-81800d72379731eb7e5fd087c34d9b9f2e45e413fb8cb9889883cfaf296c89c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1LxDAYhIMoWFf_gYeA50K-ukm8SVk_lgUv67mkyRs3S7epSRfpvzewwsDM8MAwV6iiVDa1kkRdo4qRRteNZPIW3eV8JGTNNKEV2u7jr0kOmxEb78MY5gXnyVjAJ5gP0cUhfi_PuI1jDg6SmUNJ2MeEhzCXbhecIINJ9nCPbrwZMjz8-wp9vW727Xu9-3z7aF92NTAi5lpRRYiTjEstOYVeQuMdUdJy4XSvPQPRgKDc98r2Wqkibr3xTK-t0lbyFXq87EIKtptSOJm0dJttmdOCFPx0wVOKP2fIc3eM5zSWRx2lVKhGcyL4H_6mU2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114859304</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>C. Lammers, Jayne ; Curwood, Jen Scott ; Magnifico, Alecia Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>C. Lammers, Jayne ; Curwood, Jen Scott ; Magnifico, Alecia Marie</creatorcontrib><description>As researchers seek to make sense of young people's online literacy practices and participation, questions of methodology are important to consider. In our work to understand the culture of physical, virtual and blended spheres that adolescents inhabit, we find it necessary to expand Gee's (2004) notion of affinity spaces. In this article, we draw on our research examining adolescent literacies related to The Sims video games, The Hunger Games novels, and the Neopets online game to explicate nine features of affinity space research that reflect participation in, and research about, online environments. We argue that studying adolescent literacies in affinity spaces affords us access to participants outside our geographic proximity, readily available web-based historical record of the affinity spaces' practices, and a way to trace literacy practices across portals, modes and texts. However, affinity space research poses challenges, including issues of recruiting and maintaining relationships with participants, the instability and impermanence of online environments and artefacts, and the porous boundaries of field sites. This article concludes with recommendations for future literacy research conducted in online spaces and implications for literacy teaching and learning. Our aim is to begin articulating a new methodological framework for studying affinity spaces: affinity space ethnography.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-5727</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1175-8708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1175-8708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hamilton: University of Waikato, Department of English</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Computer & video games ; Distance learning ; Ethnography ; Games ; Informal Education ; Information Literacy ; Internet ; Literacy ; Literacy Education ; Methods ; Multimedia Materials ; Novels ; Popular Culture ; Social Networks ; Teacher Educators ; Video Games</subject><ispartof>English teaching : practice and critique, 2012-07, Vol.11 (2), p.44</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Waikato, Department of English Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1114859304?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21378,21394,33611,33877,43733,43880</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ973940$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>C. Lammers, Jayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curwood, Jen Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnifico, Alecia Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research</title><title>English teaching : practice and critique</title><description>As researchers seek to make sense of young people's online literacy practices and participation, questions of methodology are important to consider. In our work to understand the culture of physical, virtual and blended spheres that adolescents inhabit, we find it necessary to expand Gee's (2004) notion of affinity spaces. In this article, we draw on our research examining adolescent literacies related to The Sims video games, The Hunger Games novels, and the Neopets online game to explicate nine features of affinity space research that reflect participation in, and research about, online environments. We argue that studying adolescent literacies in affinity spaces affords us access to participants outside our geographic proximity, readily available web-based historical record of the affinity spaces' practices, and a way to trace literacy practices across portals, modes and texts. However, affinity space research poses challenges, including issues of recruiting and maintaining relationships with participants, the instability and impermanence of online environments and artefacts, and the porous boundaries of field sites. This article concludes with recommendations for future literacy research conducted in online spaces and implications for literacy teaching and learning. Our aim is to begin articulating a new methodological framework for studying affinity spaces: affinity space ethnography.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Computer & video games</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Informal Education</subject><subject>Information Literacy</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multimedia Materials</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Popular Culture</subject><subject>Social Networks</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Video Games</subject><issn>2059-5727</issn><issn>1175-8708</issn><issn>1175-8708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk1LxDAYhIMoWFf_gYeA50K-ukm8SVk_lgUv67mkyRs3S7epSRfpvzewwsDM8MAwV6iiVDa1kkRdo4qRRteNZPIW3eV8JGTNNKEV2u7jr0kOmxEb78MY5gXnyVjAJ5gP0cUhfi_PuI1jDg6SmUNJ2MeEhzCXbhecIINJ9nCPbrwZMjz8-wp9vW727Xu9-3z7aF92NTAi5lpRRYiTjEstOYVeQuMdUdJy4XSvPQPRgKDc98r2Wqkibr3xTK-t0lbyFXq87EIKtptSOJm0dJttmdOCFPx0wVOKP2fIc3eM5zSWRx2lVKhGcyL4H_6mU2c</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>C. Lammers, Jayne</creator><creator>Curwood, Jen Scott</creator><creator>Magnifico, Alecia Marie</creator><general>University of Waikato, Department of English</general><general>Wilf Malcolm Institute for Educational Research, University of Waikato</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research</title><author>C. Lammers, Jayne ; Curwood, Jen Scott ; Magnifico, Alecia Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e204t-81800d72379731eb7e5fd087c34d9b9f2e45e413fb8cb9889883cfaf296c89c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Computer & video games</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Informal Education</topic><topic>Information Literacy</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multimedia Materials</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Popular Culture</topic><topic>Social Networks</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Video Games</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>C. Lammers, Jayne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curwood, Jen Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnifico, Alecia Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>English teaching : practice and critique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>C. Lammers, Jayne</au><au>Curwood, Jen Scott</au><au>Magnifico, Alecia Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ973940</ericid><atitle>Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research</atitle><jtitle>English teaching : practice and critique</jtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>44</spage><pages>44-</pages><issn>2059-5727</issn><issn>1175-8708</issn><eissn>1175-8708</eissn><abstract>As researchers seek to make sense of young people's online literacy practices and participation, questions of methodology are important to consider. In our work to understand the culture of physical, virtual and blended spheres that adolescents inhabit, we find it necessary to expand Gee's (2004) notion of affinity spaces. In this article, we draw on our research examining adolescent literacies related to The Sims video games, The Hunger Games novels, and the Neopets online game to explicate nine features of affinity space research that reflect participation in, and research about, online environments. We argue that studying adolescent literacies in affinity spaces affords us access to participants outside our geographic proximity, readily available web-based historical record of the affinity spaces' practices, and a way to trace literacy practices across portals, modes and texts. However, affinity space research poses challenges, including issues of recruiting and maintaining relationships with participants, the instability and impermanence of online environments and artefacts, and the porous boundaries of field sites. This article concludes with recommendations for future literacy research conducted in online spaces and implications for literacy teaching and learning. Our aim is to begin articulating a new methodological framework for studying affinity spaces: affinity space ethnography.</abstract><cop>Hamilton</cop><pub>University of Waikato, Department of English</pub><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2059-5727 |
ispartof | English teaching : practice and critique, 2012-07, Vol.11 (2), p.44 |
issn | 2059-5727 1175-8708 1175-8708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ973940 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Adolescents Computer & video games Distance learning Ethnography Games Informal Education Information Literacy Internet Literacy Literacy Education Methods Multimedia Materials Novels Popular Culture Social Networks Teacher Educators Video Games |
title | Toward an affinity space methodology: Considerations for literacy research |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T20%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20affinity%20space%20methodology:%20Considerations%20for%20literacy%20research&rft.jtitle=English%20teaching%20:%20practice%20and%20critique&rft.au=C.%20Lammers,%20Jayne&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=44&rft.pages=44-&rft.issn=2059-5727&rft.eissn=1175-8708&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2796971091%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e204t-81800d72379731eb7e5fd087c34d9b9f2e45e413fb8cb9889883cfaf296c89c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114859304&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ973940&rfr_iscdi=true |