Loading…
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities
This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effecti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational sciences : theory & practice 2012-01, Vol.12 (1), p.366 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 366 |
container_title | Educational sciences : theory & practice |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Aykut, Cigil |
description | This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ978448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ978448</ericid><sourcerecordid>2614671681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e812-d44d539f015adee96ec81554e7caa34304349c8ae2abd5e1f3cf18688096d8c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1OwzAUhLMAiVK4AQuLfSSndlJ7idLypyKQyD5y7Rf6imsX2ynKdTgpoWU1mvlGoznLJgWjLKdclBfZZYxbSisu-WyS_Sy7DnTCAziIkShnyJigRnB6IL4jtXcxKZfyBndAFmDVcGy9-Jjy5HMLKibyFvxufxQNpg8QCTrSgNIbdB9kodAOZIWHP_P-idZGkjypN2hNAEe-MW3Ik0tg7filV5YsMKo1WkwI8So775SNcP2v06y5Xzb1Y756fXiq71Y5iGKWG85NyWRHi1IZAFmBFkVZcphrpRhnlDMutVAwU2tTQtEx3RWiEoLKygjN2DS7Oc1CQN3uA-5UGNrls5wLzsWIb094H_xXDzG1W98HNx5qJaNCVLSQ7BdnLXEh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>930886019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Aykut, Cigil</creator><creatorcontrib>Aykut, Cigil</creatorcontrib><description>This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1303-0485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Istanbul: EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.)</publisher><subject>Children ; Cooking Instruction ; Daily Living Skills ; Delay of Gratification ; Elementary Schools ; Foreign Countries ; Generalization ; Intellectual Disability ; Maintenance ; Mental Retardation ; Program Effectiveness ; Prompting ; Rehabilitation Centers ; Sewing Instruction ; Skill Development ; Special Education ; Special Schools ; Teaching Methods ; Time on Task ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Educational sciences : theory & practice, 2012-01, Vol.12 (1), p.366</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.) Winter 2012</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/930886019/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/930886019?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,21361,21377,33594,33860,43716,43863,73972,74148</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ978448$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aykut, Cigil</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</title><title>Educational sciences : theory & practice</title><description>This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cooking Instruction</subject><subject>Daily Living Skills</subject><subject>Delay of Gratification</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Generalization</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Prompting</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers</subject><subject>Sewing Instruction</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Special Schools</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time on Task</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>1303-0485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk1OwzAUhLMAiVK4AQuLfSSndlJ7idLypyKQyD5y7Rf6imsX2ynKdTgpoWU1mvlGoznLJgWjLKdclBfZZYxbSisu-WyS_Sy7DnTCAziIkShnyJigRnB6IL4jtXcxKZfyBndAFmDVcGy9-Jjy5HMLKibyFvxufxQNpg8QCTrSgNIbdB9kodAOZIWHP_P-idZGkjypN2hNAEe-MW3Ik0tg7filV5YsMKo1WkwI8So775SNcP2v06y5Xzb1Y756fXiq71Y5iGKWG85NyWRHi1IZAFmBFkVZcphrpRhnlDMutVAwU2tTQtEx3RWiEoLKygjN2DS7Oc1CQN3uA-5UGNrls5wLzsWIb094H_xXDzG1W98HNx5qJaNCVLSQ7BdnLXEh</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Aykut, Cigil</creator><general>EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.)</general><general>Educational Consultancy, Ltd (EDAM)</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</title><author>Aykut, Cigil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e812-d44d539f015adee96ec81554e7caa34304349c8ae2abd5e1f3cf18688096d8c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cooking Instruction</topic><topic>Daily Living Skills</topic><topic>Delay of Gratification</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Generalization</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Prompting</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers</topic><topic>Sewing Instruction</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Special Schools</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time on Task</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aykut, Cigil</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Educational sciences : theory & practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aykut, Cigil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ978448</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Educational sciences : theory & practice</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>366</spage><pages>366-</pages><issn>1303-0485</issn><abstract>This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.</abstract><cop>Istanbul</cop><pub>EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.)</pub><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1303-0485 |
ispartof | Educational sciences : theory & practice, 2012-01, Vol.12 (1), p.366 |
issn | 1303-0485 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ978448 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Children Cooking Instruction Daily Living Skills Delay of Gratification Elementary Schools Foreign Countries Generalization Intellectual Disability Maintenance Mental Retardation Program Effectiveness Prompting Rehabilitation Centers Sewing Instruction Skill Development Special Education Special Schools Teaching Methods Time on Task Turkey |
title | Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20Efficiency%20of%20Constant-Time%20Delay%20and%20Most-to-least%20Prompt%20Procedures%20in%20Teaching%20Daily%20Living%20Skills%20to%20Children%20with%20Intellectual%20Disabilities&rft.jtitle=Educational%20sciences%20:%20theory%20&%20practice&rft.au=Aykut,%20Cigil&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=366&rft.pages=366-&rft.issn=1303-0485&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2614671681%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e812-d44d539f015adee96ec81554e7caa34304349c8ae2abd5e1f3cf18688096d8c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=930886019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ978448&rfr_iscdi=true |