Loading…

Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities

This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational sciences : theory & practice 2012-01, Vol.12 (1), p.366
Main Author: Aykut, Cigil
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 366
container_title Educational sciences : theory & practice
container_volume 12
creator Aykut, Cigil
description This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ978448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ978448</ericid><sourcerecordid>2614671681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e812-d44d539f015adee96ec81554e7caa34304349c8ae2abd5e1f3cf18688096d8c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1OwzAUhLMAiVK4AQuLfSSndlJ7idLypyKQyD5y7Rf6imsX2ynKdTgpoWU1mvlGoznLJgWjLKdclBfZZYxbSisu-WyS_Sy7DnTCAziIkShnyJigRnB6IL4jtXcxKZfyBndAFmDVcGy9-Jjy5HMLKibyFvxufxQNpg8QCTrSgNIbdB9kodAOZIWHP_P-idZGkjypN2hNAEe-MW3Ik0tg7filV5YsMKo1WkwI8So775SNcP2v06y5Xzb1Y756fXiq71Y5iGKWG85NyWRHi1IZAFmBFkVZcphrpRhnlDMutVAwU2tTQtEx3RWiEoLKygjN2DS7Oc1CQN3uA-5UGNrls5wLzsWIb094H_xXDzG1W98HNx5qJaNCVLSQ7BdnLXEh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>930886019</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Aykut, Cigil</creator><creatorcontrib>Aykut, Cigil</creatorcontrib><description>This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1303-0485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Istanbul: EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.)</publisher><subject>Children ; Cooking Instruction ; Daily Living Skills ; Delay of Gratification ; Elementary Schools ; Foreign Countries ; Generalization ; Intellectual Disability ; Maintenance ; Mental Retardation ; Program Effectiveness ; Prompting ; Rehabilitation Centers ; Sewing Instruction ; Skill Development ; Special Education ; Special Schools ; Teaching Methods ; Time on Task ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Educational sciences : theory &amp; practice, 2012-01, Vol.12 (1), p.366</ispartof><rights>Copyright EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.) Winter 2012</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/930886019/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/930886019?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,21361,21377,33594,33860,43716,43863,73972,74148</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ978448$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aykut, Cigil</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</title><title>Educational sciences : theory &amp; practice</title><description>This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.</description><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cooking Instruction</subject><subject>Daily Living Skills</subject><subject>Delay of Gratification</subject><subject>Elementary Schools</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Generalization</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Mental Retardation</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Prompting</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Centers</subject><subject>Sewing Instruction</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Special Schools</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time on Task</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>1303-0485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNotjk1OwzAUhLMAiVK4AQuLfSSndlJ7idLypyKQyD5y7Rf6imsX2ynKdTgpoWU1mvlGoznLJgWjLKdclBfZZYxbSisu-WyS_Sy7DnTCAziIkShnyJigRnB6IL4jtXcxKZfyBndAFmDVcGy9-Jjy5HMLKibyFvxufxQNpg8QCTrSgNIbdB9kodAOZIWHP_P-idZGkjypN2hNAEe-MW3Ik0tg7filV5YsMKo1WkwI8So775SNcP2v06y5Xzb1Y756fXiq71Y5iGKWG85NyWRHi1IZAFmBFkVZcphrpRhnlDMutVAwU2tTQtEx3RWiEoLKygjN2DS7Oc1CQN3uA-5UGNrls5wLzsWIb094H_xXDzG1W98HNx5qJaNCVLSQ7BdnLXEh</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Aykut, Cigil</creator><general>EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.)</general><general>Educational Consultancy, Ltd (EDAM)</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</title><author>Aykut, Cigil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e812-d44d539f015adee96ec81554e7caa34304349c8ae2abd5e1f3cf18688096d8c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cooking Instruction</topic><topic>Daily Living Skills</topic><topic>Delay of Gratification</topic><topic>Elementary Schools</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Generalization</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Mental Retardation</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Prompting</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Centers</topic><topic>Sewing Instruction</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Special Schools</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time on Task</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aykut, Cigil</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Educational sciences : theory &amp; practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aykut, Cigil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ978448</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Educational sciences : theory &amp; practice</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>366</spage><pages>366-</pages><issn>1303-0485</issn><abstract>This study is aimed at comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of constant-time delay and most-to-least prompt procedures in teaching daily living skills to children with mental retardation. Adapted alternating treatment design was used. The outcome shows that both procedures were equally effective in teaching the daily living skills. However, the most-to-least prompt procedure is more efficient than a constant-time delay procedure in terms of total training time, number of trials and training errors. Both strategies are found to have similar effectiveness in maintenance and generalization for daily living skills.</abstract><cop>Istanbul</cop><pub>EDAM (Educational Consultancy Ltd.)</pub><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1303-0485
ispartof Educational sciences : theory & practice, 2012-01, Vol.12 (1), p.366
issn 1303-0485
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ978448
source Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection
subjects Children
Cooking Instruction
Daily Living Skills
Delay of Gratification
Elementary Schools
Foreign Countries
Generalization
Intellectual Disability
Maintenance
Mental Retardation
Program Effectiveness
Prompting
Rehabilitation Centers
Sewing Instruction
Skill Development
Special Education
Special Schools
Teaching Methods
Time on Task
Turkey
title Effectiveness and Efficiency of Constant-Time Delay and Most-to-least Prompt Procedures in Teaching Daily Living Skills to Children with Intellectual Disabilities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20and%20Efficiency%20of%20Constant-Time%20Delay%20and%20Most-to-least%20Prompt%20Procedures%20in%20Teaching%20Daily%20Living%20Skills%20to%20Children%20with%20Intellectual%20Disabilities&rft.jtitle=Educational%20sciences%20:%20theory%20&%20practice&rft.au=Aykut,%20Cigil&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=366&rft.pages=366-&rft.issn=1303-0485&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2614671681%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e812-d44d539f015adee96ec81554e7caa34304349c8ae2abd5e1f3cf18688096d8c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=930886019&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ978448&rfr_iscdi=true