Winter wheat straw management on subsequent processing tomato yield, quality, economics and nitrogen dynamics

• Published in: Canadian journal of plant science 2015-03, Vol.95 (2), p.273-283
• Main Authors: Eerd, Laura L. Van, Loewen, Steven A, Vyn, Richard J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: biomass; calcium ammonium nitrate; color; cover crops; crop yield; fertilizer application; field experimentation; fruit quality; marge bénéficiaire; nitrogen; nitrogen fertilizers; paille; planting; profit margins; profits and margins; qualité des fruits; rye; Secale cereale; Solanum lycopersicum; stover; tomatoes; total soluble solids; Triticum aestivum; Vegetable; wheat straw; winter wheat
• ISSN: 0008-4220; 1918-1833; 1918-1833
• DOI: 10.1139/CJPS-2014-321

Van Eerd, L. L., Loewen, S. A. and Vyn, R. J. 2015. Winter wheat straw management on subsequent processing tomato yield, quality, economics and nitrogen dynamics. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 273-283. The removal of crop residues to meet the anticipated demand for the bioeconomy sector may impact subsequent crop productivity. A field experiment was designed to evaluate the response of processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw management practices of: (1) retaining straw, (2) removing straw, or (3) retaining straw with a fall application of calcium ammonium nitrate at 34 kg N ha-1 to enhance straw decomposition. At two locations in 2006-2009, a split-plot design within a randomized complete block experiment, with wheat straw management as main-plot factor and nitrogen fertilizer (0 and 145 or 224 kg N ha-1) to the tomato crop as split-plot factor. At Ridgetown, marketable and total yield and profit margins were significantly higher with straw retained compared with straw removed treatments (total yield of 74.4 vs. 66.3 Mg ha-1 yr-1, respectively) but the straw retained plus fall N treatment (total yield 72.8 Mg ha-1 yr-1) was not different. However, at Leamington, straw management had no effect on yield or profit margins likely due to the rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop used in the production system. At both locations, tomato quality (color, pH, soluble solids) was not influenced by straw or N management. Nitrogen fertilizer application to tomato had a significant effect on total processing yield, soil mineral N, and plant N, but wheat straw management had no effect on these parameters and there were no N fertilizer by straw management interactions. Winter wheat straw management did not impact soil N fertility for subsequent crop production. Thus, there may be significant undesired effects of removing crop residues on a subsequent crop yield; however, planting a cover crop may mitigate subsequent yield losses associated with biomass removal.