miniSASS - A novel technique for community participation in river health monitoring and management

Reliable indicators of water quality and river health are often difficult and expensive to derive. This paper reports on a process to develop a low technology, scientifically reliable and robust technique to monitor water quality in rivers and streams. With these requirements in mind the authors set...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:African journal of aquatic science 2004, Vol.29 (1), p.25-35
Main Authors: Graham, P.M, Dickens, C.W.S. (Umgeni Water, Pietermaritzburg (South Africa). Hydrobiology), Taylor, R.J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AFRIQUE DU SUD
AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES
AQUATIC ORGANISMS
BIOMONITORING
CALIDAD DEL AGUA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COURS D'EAU
CURSOS DE AGUA
DESARROLLO DE LA COMUNIDAD
DÉVELOPPEMENT DE LA COMMUNAUTÉ
Freshwater
Invertebrata
MONITORING
ORGANISME AQUATIQUE
ORGANISMOS ACUÁTICOS
QUALITÉ DE L'EAU
RIVERS
SASS
SOUTH AFRICA
SUDÁFRICA
SURVEILLANCE
TECHNOLOGIE
TECHNOLOGY
TECNOLOGÍA
VIGILANCIA
WATER QUALITY
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Reliable indicators of water quality and river health are often difficult and expensive to derive. This paper reports on a process to develop a low technology, scientifically reliable and robust technique to monitor water quality in rivers and streams. With these requirements in mind the authors set about developing a simplified method of biomonitoring based on the tried and tested SASS (South African Scoring System) technique. This involved reducing the taxonomic complexity of SASS to a few aquatic invertebrate 'groupings' which would act as surrogates for the complete suite of SASS taxa. To be efficient the technique had to satisfy the following requirements: 1. minimise the number of aquatic invertebrate groupings necessary to perform miniSASS; 2. aquatic invertebrate groups should be easily identifiable; 3. the method should be robust and produce results comparable to the full SASS technique; and 4. be geographically widely applicable. These requirements were met in this development and for a large set of data (>2 000 records) covering the Mpumalanga / Eastern Seaboard (Umgeni Water) and Western Cape regions there appear to be no statistically significant differences between SASS and miniSASS scores. However, once the data becomes split into various water quality classes (as defined in the Draft Procedures for the Water Quality Reserve, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry 2002) statistically significant differences between SASS and miniSASS become apparent. Nonetheless, these differences are relatively small and are usually less than 1 ASPT score different. Potentially, every school, environmental or community group in the country could become a monitoring cell, and with this geographical spread use the miniSASS tool as a 'red flag' for the identification of aquatic pollution sources and events in their immediate environment. The parallel and supporting initiative, to be able to enter this 'real aquatic biomonitoring data' onto an internet web-based mapping programme (see www.riverhealth.co.za), extends the application of the resource making networking and broad based catchment water quality monitoring a real possibility. miniSASS can therefore be used with some confidence, producing data which vary slightly from SASS, but which is sufficiently accurate to be of value to all stakeholders with an interest in river health. The increased opportunity for communities to become involved, use a scientifically valid tool and undertake real biomonitoring o
ISSN:1608-5914
1727-9364
DOI:10.2989/16085910409503789