Information Feedback, Targeting, and Coordination: An Experimental Study

There are many contexts in which an “everybody else is doing it” attitude is relevant. We evaluate the impact of this attitude in a multithreshold public goods game. We use a lab experiment to study the role of providing information about contribution behavior to targeted subsets of individuals, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Information systems research 2017-06, Vol.28 (2), p.289-308
Main Authors: Hashim, Matthew J., Kannan, Karthik N., Maximiano, Sandra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Crowdfunding
economics of IS
Experimental economics
piracy
public good
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There are many contexts in which an “everybody else is doing it” attitude is relevant. We evaluate the impact of this attitude in a multithreshold public goods game. We use a lab experiment to study the role of providing information about contribution behavior to targeted subsets of individuals, and its effect on coordination. Treatments include one in which no information is provided and three other treatments, i.e., where information is provided to a random sample of subjects; to those whose contributions are below the average of their group, and to those whose contributions are above the average of their group. We find that the random provision of information is no different than not providing information. More important, average contributions improve with targeted treatments. Coordination waste is also lower with targeted treatments. The insights from this research are more broadly relevant in the contexts of piracy, open innovation, and crowdfunding. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0663
ISSN:1047-7047
1526-5536
DOI:10.1287/isre.2016.0663