Loading…
Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred
Background: Patient-centered care is respectful to a patient's preference. All prior clinical trials on patient self-titration algorithms for basal insulin were decided by physicians. We hypothesized that patients and physicians have different preferences. Patients and methods: Physicians and d...
Saved in:
Published in: | Patient preference and adherence 2020-03, p.1253 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1253 |
container_title | Patient preference and adherence |
container_volume | |
creator | Wang, Yunlin He, Ling Chen, Chen,Bo Li, Xiaowei Zhao, Yunjuan Zhang, Xiaodan Du, Tao Zhang, Tong Li, Wangen Liu, Ruike |
description | Background: Patient-centered care is respectful to a patient's preference. All prior clinical trials on patient self-titration algorithms for basal insulin were decided by physicians. We hypothesized that patients and physicians have different preferences. Patients and methods: Physicians and diabetes patients were asked to choose their preferred insulin glargine self-titration algorithm among 5 algorithms. Algorithm 1, 1 U increase once daily; algorithm 2, 2 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 3, 3 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 4, titration every 3 days according to fasting blood glucose, and algorithm 5, weekly titration 2-8 U based on 3-day mean fasting blood glucose levels. Results: Eleven (5.2%) out of 210 physicians and 180 (90.9%) out of 198 patients preferred algorithm 1 ([chi square]=300.4, p=0.000). In contrast, 195 (92.9%) physicians and 18 (9.1%) patients preferred algorithm 2 ([chi square]=286.6, p=0.000). In addition, 4 (1.9%) physicians but no patients preferred algorithm 3 ([chi square]=2.099, p=0.124). Neither physicians nor patients chose algorithms 4 or 5. Most physicians preferred algorithm 2 since it is recommended by guidelines, but most patients preferred algorithm 1 for its simplicity. Conclusion: Patients had different preferences compared with physicians. Attention should be given to patients' preferences to increase adherence and improve glycemic control. Keywords: type 2 diabetes, titration algorithm, insulin glargine, basal insulin, self-adjustment, shared decision-making, adherence |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_healthsolutions_A622160824</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A622160824</galeid><sourcerecordid>A622160824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A6221608243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjD0LwjAURYMoWD_-Qya3QptKWt1EFAeHDg5u5dm-ttGQSF5U_PcqCjo63cs9h9thQRynaZhls333p_fZgOgYRTKRIg4YbKE8cVvz0lpXKQNeWcMP6G-Ihp_BeYOO5lyZK5JXzZs__by9kyoVmDB3WKNzWHEwFc-fBhr_XUesV4MmHH9yyCbr1W65CRvQWLQI2rdk9eV1TMVCChHLKBPT5G_xAbvjSbk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Wang, Yunlin ; He, Ling ; Chen, Chen,Bo ; Li, Xiaowei ; Zhao, Yunjuan ; Zhang, Xiaodan ; Du, Tao ; Zhang, Tong ; Li, Wangen ; Liu, Ruike</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yunlin ; He, Ling ; Chen, Chen,Bo ; Li, Xiaowei ; Zhao, Yunjuan ; Zhang, Xiaodan ; Du, Tao ; Zhang, Tong ; Li, Wangen ; Liu, Ruike</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Patient-centered care is respectful to a patient's preference. All prior clinical trials on patient self-titration algorithms for basal insulin were decided by physicians. We hypothesized that patients and physicians have different preferences. Patients and methods: Physicians and diabetes patients were asked to choose their preferred insulin glargine self-titration algorithm among 5 algorithms. Algorithm 1, 1 U increase once daily; algorithm 2, 2 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 3, 3 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 4, titration every 3 days according to fasting blood glucose, and algorithm 5, weekly titration 2-8 U based on 3-day mean fasting blood glucose levels. Results: Eleven (5.2%) out of 210 physicians and 180 (90.9%) out of 198 patients preferred algorithm 1 ([chi square]=300.4, p=0.000). In contrast, 195 (92.9%) physicians and 18 (9.1%) patients preferred algorithm 2 ([chi square]=286.6, p=0.000). In addition, 4 (1.9%) physicians but no patients preferred algorithm 3 ([chi square]=2.099, p=0.124). Neither physicians nor patients chose algorithms 4 or 5. Most physicians preferred algorithm 2 since it is recommended by guidelines, but most patients preferred algorithm 1 for its simplicity. Conclusion: Patients had different preferences compared with physicians. Attention should be given to patients' preferences to increase adherence and improve glycemic control. Keywords: type 2 diabetes, titration algorithm, insulin glargine, basal insulin, self-adjustment, shared decision-making, adherence</description><identifier>ISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1177-889X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dove Medical Press Limited</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Blood glucose ; Clinical trials ; Decision making ; Glucose ; Hypoglycemic agents ; Insulin ; Insulin glargine ; Patient care ; Type 2 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Patient preference and adherence, 2020-03, p.1253</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yunlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chen,Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yunjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wangen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruike</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred</title><title>Patient preference and adherence</title><description>Background: Patient-centered care is respectful to a patient's preference. All prior clinical trials on patient self-titration algorithms for basal insulin were decided by physicians. We hypothesized that patients and physicians have different preferences. Patients and methods: Physicians and diabetes patients were asked to choose their preferred insulin glargine self-titration algorithm among 5 algorithms. Algorithm 1, 1 U increase once daily; algorithm 2, 2 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 3, 3 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 4, titration every 3 days according to fasting blood glucose, and algorithm 5, weekly titration 2-8 U based on 3-day mean fasting blood glucose levels. Results: Eleven (5.2%) out of 210 physicians and 180 (90.9%) out of 198 patients preferred algorithm 1 ([chi square]=300.4, p=0.000). In contrast, 195 (92.9%) physicians and 18 (9.1%) patients preferred algorithm 2 ([chi square]=286.6, p=0.000). In addition, 4 (1.9%) physicians but no patients preferred algorithm 3 ([chi square]=2.099, p=0.124). Neither physicians nor patients chose algorithms 4 or 5. Most physicians preferred algorithm 2 since it is recommended by guidelines, but most patients preferred algorithm 1 for its simplicity. Conclusion: Patients had different preferences compared with physicians. Attention should be given to patients' preferences to increase adherence and improve glycemic control. Keywords: type 2 diabetes, titration algorithm, insulin glargine, basal insulin, self-adjustment, shared decision-making, adherence</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Blood glucose</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic agents</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Insulin glargine</subject><subject>Patient care</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><issn>1177-889X</issn><issn>1177-889X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjD0LwjAURYMoWD_-Qya3QptKWt1EFAeHDg5u5dm-ttGQSF5U_PcqCjo63cs9h9thQRynaZhls333p_fZgOgYRTKRIg4YbKE8cVvz0lpXKQNeWcMP6G-Ihp_BeYOO5lyZK5JXzZs__by9kyoVmDB3WKNzWHEwFc-fBhr_XUesV4MmHH9yyCbr1W65CRvQWLQI2rdk9eV1TMVCChHLKBPT5G_xAbvjSbk</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Wang, Yunlin</creator><creator>He, Ling</creator><creator>Chen, Chen,Bo</creator><creator>Li, Xiaowei</creator><creator>Zhao, Yunjuan</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiaodan</creator><creator>Du, Tao</creator><creator>Zhang, Tong</creator><creator>Li, Wangen</creator><creator>Liu, Ruike</creator><general>Dove Medical Press Limited</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred</title><author>Wang, Yunlin ; He, Ling ; Chen, Chen,Bo ; Li, Xiaowei ; Zhao, Yunjuan ; Zhang, Xiaodan ; Du, Tao ; Zhang, Tong ; Li, Wangen ; Liu, Ruike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A6221608243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Blood glucose</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic agents</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Insulin glargine</topic><topic>Patient care</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yunlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chen,Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaowei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yunjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiaodan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wangen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ruike</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Yunlin</au><au>He, Ling</au><au>Chen, Chen,Bo</au><au>Li, Xiaowei</au><au>Zhao, Yunjuan</au><au>Zhang, Xiaodan</au><au>Du, Tao</au><au>Zhang, Tong</au><au>Li, Wangen</au><au>Liu, Ruike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred</atitle><jtitle>Patient preference and adherence</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><spage>1253</spage><pages>1253-</pages><issn>1177-889X</issn><eissn>1177-889X</eissn><abstract>Background: Patient-centered care is respectful to a patient's preference. All prior clinical trials on patient self-titration algorithms for basal insulin were decided by physicians. We hypothesized that patients and physicians have different preferences. Patients and methods: Physicians and diabetes patients were asked to choose their preferred insulin glargine self-titration algorithm among 5 algorithms. Algorithm 1, 1 U increase once daily; algorithm 2, 2 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 3, 3 U increase every 3 days; algorithm 4, titration every 3 days according to fasting blood glucose, and algorithm 5, weekly titration 2-8 U based on 3-day mean fasting blood glucose levels. Results: Eleven (5.2%) out of 210 physicians and 180 (90.9%) out of 198 patients preferred algorithm 1 ([chi square]=300.4, p=0.000). In contrast, 195 (92.9%) physicians and 18 (9.1%) patients preferred algorithm 2 ([chi square]=286.6, p=0.000). In addition, 4 (1.9%) physicians but no patients preferred algorithm 3 ([chi square]=2.099, p=0.124). Neither physicians nor patients chose algorithms 4 or 5. Most physicians preferred algorithm 2 since it is recommended by guidelines, but most patients preferred algorithm 1 for its simplicity. Conclusion: Patients had different preferences compared with physicians. Attention should be given to patients' preferences to increase adherence and improve glycemic control. Keywords: type 2 diabetes, titration algorithm, insulin glargine, basal insulin, self-adjustment, shared decision-making, adherence</abstract><pub>Dove Medical Press Limited</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1177-889X |
ispartof | Patient preference and adherence, 2020-03, p.1253 |
issn | 1177-889X 1177-889X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_healthsolutions_A622160824 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Algorithms Blood glucose Clinical trials Decision making Glucose Hypoglycemic agents Insulin Insulin glargine Patient care Type 2 diabetes |
title | Lack of coordination between partners: investigation of Physician-Preferred and Patient-Preferred |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A01%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20coordination%20between%20partners:%20investigation%20of%20Physician-Preferred%20and%20Patient-Preferred&rft.jtitle=Patient%20preference%20and%20adherence&rft.au=Wang,%20Yunlin&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.spage=1253&rft.pages=1253-&rft.issn=1177-889X&rft.eissn=1177-889X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA622160824%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A6221608243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A622160824&rfr_iscdi=true |