Loading…
Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio
Introduction: In the current standard of care (SoC) RT-PCR method for COVID-19, the patient's swab was extracted in viral transport media (VTM). For the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the patient swab is flushed out in extraction buffer, of which a small fraction is used for testing, leavin...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases 2021-09, Vol.25 (5), p.1 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De Galliez, Rafael Mello Faffe, Debora Souza Mariani, Diana Tanuri, Amilcar Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos Ferreira, Orlando Costa |
description | Introduction: In the current standard of care (SoC) RT-PCR method for COVID-19, the patient's swab was extracted in viral transport media (VTM). For the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the patient swab is flushed out in extraction buffer, of which a small fraction is used for testing, leaving more than half the sample unused. This study was designed to show that RT-PCR results from the residual sample of the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (called Novel RT-PCR) are not worse than the SoC RT-PCR result. Methods: The study was performed using (1) dilution series of five patient samples, and (2) 413 patient samples comparing SOC versus Novel RT-PCR results. Results: For the dilution series samples, all tested positive by both methods. The bias between Ct values of Novel RT-PCR and SoC RT-PCR did not exceed 3.00 Ct using primers N1 and N2. A total of 413 COVID symptomatic patients seeking COVID testing were tested, of which 89 patients tested positive and 324 tested negative with SoC RT-PCR. In 324 patients who tested negative with SoC RT-PCR, 323 tested negative with Novel RT-PCR, and one (1) tested positive. Out of 89 who tested positive with SoC RT-PCR, 80 tested positive with the Novel RT-PCR, and nine patients showed a negative test result. The Overall Percent Agreement for the 413 valid patient sample pairs was 97.5 [95% CI 97 to 98]. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the performance of the Novel RT-PCR method is acceptable compared to the SoC RT-PCR method and can be a useful tool to perform RT-PCR without the need for new swab collections. Keywords: COVID-19 Antigen rapid test RT-PCR |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_healthsolutions_A695516777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A695516777</galeid><sourcerecordid>A695516777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A6955167773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzbsOgjAUgOEOmoiXdziTG0mRS3U0RONICDs5winUlJa0xefXwQdw-pcv-VcsSrIkjc-F4Bu29f7F-SnnGY9YU5GT1k1oOgIrAQ2gDuQMBvUmqJu4KmuYne2oXxzB4pUZwJFX_YIaPE6zJpDOThBGggrNU9k9W0vUng6_7tjxfmvKRzygpnak72H0Vi9BWePba3HJ86QQQqR_ww9exUHN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio</title><source>SciELO Brazil</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De ; Galliez, Rafael Mello ; Faffe, Debora Souza ; Mariani, Diana ; Tanuri, Amilcar ; Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto ; Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho ; Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos ; Ferreira, Orlando Costa</creator><creatorcontrib>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De ; Galliez, Rafael Mello ; Faffe, Debora Souza ; Mariani, Diana ; Tanuri, Amilcar ; Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto ; Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho ; Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos ; Ferreira, Orlando Costa</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: In the current standard of care (SoC) RT-PCR method for COVID-19, the patient's swab was extracted in viral transport media (VTM). For the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the patient swab is flushed out in extraction buffer, of which a small fraction is used for testing, leaving more than half the sample unused. This study was designed to show that RT-PCR results from the residual sample of the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (called Novel RT-PCR) are not worse than the SoC RT-PCR result. Methods: The study was performed using (1) dilution series of five patient samples, and (2) 413 patient samples comparing SOC versus Novel RT-PCR results. Results: For the dilution series samples, all tested positive by both methods. The bias between Ct values of Novel RT-PCR and SoC RT-PCR did not exceed 3.00 Ct using primers N1 and N2. A total of 413 COVID symptomatic patients seeking COVID testing were tested, of which 89 patients tested positive and 324 tested negative with SoC RT-PCR. In 324 patients who tested negative with SoC RT-PCR, 323 tested negative with Novel RT-PCR, and one (1) tested positive. Out of 89 who tested positive with SoC RT-PCR, 80 tested positive with the Novel RT-PCR, and nine patients showed a negative test result. The Overall Percent Agreement for the 413 valid patient sample pairs was 97.5 [95% CI 97 to 98]. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the performance of the Novel RT-PCR method is acceptable compared to the SoC RT-PCR method and can be a useful tool to perform RT-PCR without the need for new swab collections. Keywords: COVID-19 Antigen rapid test RT-PCR</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-8670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Contexto</publisher><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><ispartof>The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases, 2021-09, Vol.25 (5), p.1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Contexto</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galliez, Rafael Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faffe, Debora Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanuri, Amilcar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Orlando Costa</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio</title><title>The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases</title><description>Introduction: In the current standard of care (SoC) RT-PCR method for COVID-19, the patient's swab was extracted in viral transport media (VTM). For the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the patient swab is flushed out in extraction buffer, of which a small fraction is used for testing, leaving more than half the sample unused. This study was designed to show that RT-PCR results from the residual sample of the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (called Novel RT-PCR) are not worse than the SoC RT-PCR result. Methods: The study was performed using (1) dilution series of five patient samples, and (2) 413 patient samples comparing SOC versus Novel RT-PCR results. Results: For the dilution series samples, all tested positive by both methods. The bias between Ct values of Novel RT-PCR and SoC RT-PCR did not exceed 3.00 Ct using primers N1 and N2. A total of 413 COVID symptomatic patients seeking COVID testing were tested, of which 89 patients tested positive and 324 tested negative with SoC RT-PCR. In 324 patients who tested negative with SoC RT-PCR, 323 tested negative with Novel RT-PCR, and one (1) tested positive. Out of 89 who tested positive with SoC RT-PCR, 80 tested positive with the Novel RT-PCR, and nine patients showed a negative test result. The Overall Percent Agreement for the 413 valid patient sample pairs was 97.5 [95% CI 97 to 98]. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the performance of the Novel RT-PCR method is acceptable compared to the SoC RT-PCR method and can be a useful tool to perform RT-PCR without the need for new swab collections. Keywords: COVID-19 Antigen rapid test RT-PCR</description><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><issn>1413-8670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNzbsOgjAUgOEOmoiXdziTG0mRS3U0RONICDs5winUlJa0xefXwQdw-pcv-VcsSrIkjc-F4Bu29f7F-SnnGY9YU5GT1k1oOgIrAQ2gDuQMBvUmqJu4KmuYne2oXxzB4pUZwJFX_YIaPE6zJpDOThBGggrNU9k9W0vUng6_7tjxfmvKRzygpnak72H0Vi9BWePba3HJ86QQQqR_ww9exUHN</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De</creator><creator>Galliez, Rafael Mello</creator><creator>Faffe, Debora Souza</creator><creator>Mariani, Diana</creator><creator>Tanuri, Amilcar</creator><creator>Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto</creator><creator>Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho</creator><creator>Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos</creator><creator>Ferreira, Orlando Costa</creator><general>Contexto</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio</title><author>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De ; Galliez, Rafael Mello ; Faffe, Debora Souza ; Mariani, Diana ; Tanuri, Amilcar ; Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto ; Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho ; Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos ; Ferreira, Orlando Costa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A6955167773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galliez, Rafael Mello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faffe, Debora Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanuri, Amilcar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Orlando Costa</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Melo, Mayla Gabryele Miranda De</au><au>Galliez, Rafael Mello</au><au>Faffe, Debora Souza</au><au>Mariani, Diana</au><au>Tanuri, Amilcar</au><au>Castineiras, Terezinha Marta Pereira Pinto</au><au>Leitao, Isabela De Carvalho</au><au>Nascimento, Erica Ramos Dos Santos</au><au>Ferreira, Orlando Costa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio</atitle><jtitle>The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1413-8670</issn><abstract>Introduction: In the current standard of care (SoC) RT-PCR method for COVID-19, the patient's swab was extracted in viral transport media (VTM). For the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, the patient swab is flushed out in extraction buffer, of which a small fraction is used for testing, leaving more than half the sample unused. This study was designed to show that RT-PCR results from the residual sample of the Panbio[TM] COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test (called Novel RT-PCR) are not worse than the SoC RT-PCR result. Methods: The study was performed using (1) dilution series of five patient samples, and (2) 413 patient samples comparing SOC versus Novel RT-PCR results. Results: For the dilution series samples, all tested positive by both methods. The bias between Ct values of Novel RT-PCR and SoC RT-PCR did not exceed 3.00 Ct using primers N1 and N2. A total of 413 COVID symptomatic patients seeking COVID testing were tested, of which 89 patients tested positive and 324 tested negative with SoC RT-PCR. In 324 patients who tested negative with SoC RT-PCR, 323 tested negative with Novel RT-PCR, and one (1) tested positive. Out of 89 who tested positive with SoC RT-PCR, 80 tested positive with the Novel RT-PCR, and nine patients showed a negative test result. The Overall Percent Agreement for the 413 valid patient sample pairs was 97.5 [95% CI 97 to 98]. Conclusion: The study demonstrated that the performance of the Novel RT-PCR method is acceptable compared to the SoC RT-PCR method and can be a useful tool to perform RT-PCR without the need for new swab collections. Keywords: COVID-19 Antigen rapid test RT-PCR</abstract><pub>Contexto</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1413-8670 |
ispartof | The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases, 2021-09, Vol.25 (5), p.1 |
issn | 1413-8670 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_healthsolutions_A695516777 |
source | SciELO Brazil; ScienceDirect®; PubMed Central |
subjects | Polymerase chain reaction |
title | Performance of an alternative RT-PCR procedure using residual sample from the Panbio |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A43%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20an%20alternative%20RT-PCR%20procedure%20using%20residual%20sample%20from%20the%20Panbio&rft.jtitle=The%20Brazilian%20journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Melo,%20Mayla%20Gabryele%20Miranda%20De&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1413-8670&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA695516777%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_healthsolutions_A6955167773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A695516777&rfr_iscdi=true |