The Effect of Social Isolation on Sarcopenia: A Longitudinal Study among the Middle-Aged and Older Population in China

• Published in: Gerontology (Basel) 2023-06, Vol.69 (6), p.748-756
• Main Authors: Hu, Peipei, Zhang, Dexing, Wong, Samuel Yeung Shan, Woo, Jean, Yu, Ruby, Yip, Benjamin Hon Kei, Poon, Paul Kwok Ming
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Behavioral Science Section: Research Article; Care and treatment; Diagnosis; Health aspects; Sarcopenia; Social isolation
• ISSN: 0304-324X; 1423-0003
• DOI: 10.1159/000529443

Abstract Introduction: Although social isolation is associated with premature death and somatic and mental diseases, evidence of its long-term effect on sarcopenia is scarce. This study aimed to examine the longitudinal association between social isolation and possible sarcopenia. Methods: We extracted baseline and 4-year follow-up data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study and included participants aged 45 years or above. Social isolation was measured by factors including living alone, marital status, frequency of contact with adult children and friends, and participation in social activity. The change in social isolation from baseline to follow-up was classified into stable, progressive, and regressive groups. Possible sarcopenia was detected using the handgrip strength and five-time chair-stand test. Using mixed-effects logistic regression, we studied the effect of baseline isolation and the change in isolation status on possible sarcopenia at a 4-year follow-up. Results: A total of 5,289 participants aged 45–90 years and without possible sarcopenia at baseline were included. After 4 years, possible sarcopenia was detected in 21.7% (1,146/5,289) of the participants. Compared with the low social isolation group, the middle (OR = 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16–2.04, p = 0.003) and high social isolation groups (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.26–2.18, p < 0.001) were associated with a higher risk of possible sarcopenia. Being not married/cohabiting (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.19–2.10, p = 0.002), lack of contact with children (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.21–2.85, p = 0.004), and lack of social activities (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.04–1.53, p = 0.019) were associated with an increased risk of possible sarcopenia. Compared with the stable social isolation group, the progressive group was associated with a greater risk of possible sarcopenia (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.17–1.95, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Social isolation is associated with an increased risk of possible sarcopenia. Progressive social isolation further elevates the risk. The most vulnerable groups are middle-aged and older people who live alone, are not socially active, and lack contact with their children.