Loading…

Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Evaluation of 4-Meter Walking Speed in Older Individuals

Manual measurement of 4-meter gait speed by a stopwatch is the gold standard test for functional assessment in older adults. However, the accuracy of this technique may be biased by several factors, including intra- and inter-operator variability. Instrumental techniques of measurement using acceler...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE 2016, Vol.11 (4)
Main Authors: Maggio, Marcello, Ceda, Gian Paolo, Ticinesi, Andrea, De Vita, Francesca, Gelmini, Giovanni, Costantino, Cosimo, Meschi, Tiziana, Kressig, Reto W, Cesari, Matteo, Fabi, Massimo, Lauretani, Fulvio
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 11
creator Maggio, Marcello
Ceda, Gian Paolo
Ticinesi, Andrea
De Vita, Francesca
Gelmini, Giovanni
Costantino, Cosimo
Meschi, Tiziana
Kressig, Reto W
Cesari, Matteo
Fabi, Massimo
Lauretani, Fulvio
description Manual measurement of 4-meter gait speed by a stopwatch is the gold standard test for functional assessment in older adults. However, the accuracy of this technique may be biased by several factors, including intra- and inter-operator variability. Instrumental techniques of measurement using accelerometers may have a higher accuracy. Studies addressing the concordance between these two techniques are missing. The aim of the present community-based observational study was to compare manual and instrumental measurements of 4-meter gait speed in older individuals and to assess their relationship with other indicators of physical performance. One-hundred seventy-two (69 men, 103 women) non-disabled community-dwellers aged [greater than or equal to]65 years were enrolled. They underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment including physical function by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), hand grip strength, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Timed usual walking speed on a 4-meter course was assessed by using both a stopwatch (4-meter manual measurement, 4-MM) and a tri-axial accelerometer (4-meter automatic measurement, 4-MA). Correlations between these performance measures were evaluated separately in men and women by partial correlation coefficients. In both genders, 4-MA was associated with 4-MM (men r = 0.62, p
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0153583
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A453448121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453448121</galeid><sourcerecordid>A453448121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A4534481213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVikFrwjAYQMPYYOr8Bx5y3aE1adquHoc41oMKVhB2KR_LZ4mLX6RJxJ8_Dzvocaf3eDzGJlKkUr3J6cHFnsCmJ0eYClmoolIPbCBnKkvKTKjHG39mQ-8PQhSqKssB-6rJhz4ekQJYDqT5ylFyFxdnsBGCccTdnufJEgP2fAf2x1DHmxOi5ob42uprrkmbs9ERrH9hT_srcPzHEXv9WGznn0kHFltD344CXkIH0fu2bjbte16oPK9kJtV_3l9YMU-2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Evaluation of 4-Meter Walking Speed in Older Individuals</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Maggio, Marcello ; Ceda, Gian Paolo ; Ticinesi, Andrea ; De Vita, Francesca ; Gelmini, Giovanni ; Costantino, Cosimo ; Meschi, Tiziana ; Kressig, Reto W ; Cesari, Matteo ; Fabi, Massimo ; Lauretani, Fulvio</creator><creatorcontrib>Maggio, Marcello ; Ceda, Gian Paolo ; Ticinesi, Andrea ; De Vita, Francesca ; Gelmini, Giovanni ; Costantino, Cosimo ; Meschi, Tiziana ; Kressig, Reto W ; Cesari, Matteo ; Fabi, Massimo ; Lauretani, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><description>Manual measurement of 4-meter gait speed by a stopwatch is the gold standard test for functional assessment in older adults. However, the accuracy of this technique may be biased by several factors, including intra- and inter-operator variability. Instrumental techniques of measurement using accelerometers may have a higher accuracy. Studies addressing the concordance between these two techniques are missing. The aim of the present community-based observational study was to compare manual and instrumental measurements of 4-meter gait speed in older individuals and to assess their relationship with other indicators of physical performance. One-hundred seventy-two (69 men, 103 women) non-disabled community-dwellers aged [greater than or equal to]65 years were enrolled. They underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment including physical function by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), hand grip strength, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Timed usual walking speed on a 4-meter course was assessed by using both a stopwatch (4-meter manual measurement, 4-MM) and a tri-axial accelerometer (4-meter automatic measurement, 4-MA). Correlations between these performance measures were evaluated separately in men and women by partial correlation coefficients. In both genders, 4-MA was associated with 4-MM (men r = 0.62, p&lt;0.001; women r = 0.73, p&lt;0.001), handgrip strength (men r = 0.40, p = 0.005; women r = 0.29, p = 0.001) and 6MWT (men r = 0.50, p = 0.0004; women r = 0.22, p = 0.048). 4-MM was associated with handgrip strength and 6MWT in both men and women. Considering gait speed &lt;0.6 m/s as diagnostic of dismobility syndrome, the two methods of assessment disagreed, with a different categorization of subjects, in 19% of men and 23% of women. The use of accelerometer resulted in 29 (13 M, 16 F) additional diagnoses of dismobility, compared with the 4-MM. In an older population, the concordance of gait speeds manually or instrumentally assessed is not optimal. The results suggest that manual measures might lead to misclassification of a substantial number of subjects. However, longitudinal studies using standardized and validated procedures aimed at the comparison of different techniques are needed before recommending the use of accelerometers in comprehensive geriatric assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153583</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Elderly ; Gait ; Physiological aspects ; Walking</subject><ispartof>PLoS ONE, 2016, Vol.11 (4)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780,4476,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maggio, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceda, Gian Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ticinesi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vita, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelmini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meschi, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kressig, Reto W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesari, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabi, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauretani, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><title>Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Evaluation of 4-Meter Walking Speed in Older Individuals</title><title>PLoS ONE</title><description>Manual measurement of 4-meter gait speed by a stopwatch is the gold standard test for functional assessment in older adults. However, the accuracy of this technique may be biased by several factors, including intra- and inter-operator variability. Instrumental techniques of measurement using accelerometers may have a higher accuracy. Studies addressing the concordance between these two techniques are missing. The aim of the present community-based observational study was to compare manual and instrumental measurements of 4-meter gait speed in older individuals and to assess their relationship with other indicators of physical performance. One-hundred seventy-two (69 men, 103 women) non-disabled community-dwellers aged [greater than or equal to]65 years were enrolled. They underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment including physical function by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), hand grip strength, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Timed usual walking speed on a 4-meter course was assessed by using both a stopwatch (4-meter manual measurement, 4-MM) and a tri-axial accelerometer (4-meter automatic measurement, 4-MA). Correlations between these performance measures were evaluated separately in men and women by partial correlation coefficients. In both genders, 4-MA was associated with 4-MM (men r = 0.62, p&lt;0.001; women r = 0.73, p&lt;0.001), handgrip strength (men r = 0.40, p = 0.005; women r = 0.29, p = 0.001) and 6MWT (men r = 0.50, p = 0.0004; women r = 0.22, p = 0.048). 4-MM was associated with handgrip strength and 6MWT in both men and women. Considering gait speed &lt;0.6 m/s as diagnostic of dismobility syndrome, the two methods of assessment disagreed, with a different categorization of subjects, in 19% of men and 23% of women. The use of accelerometer resulted in 29 (13 M, 16 F) additional diagnoses of dismobility, compared with the 4-MM. In an older population, the concordance of gait speeds manually or instrumentally assessed is not optimal. The results suggest that manual measures might lead to misclassification of a substantial number of subjects. However, longitudinal studies using standardized and validated procedures aimed at the comparison of different techniques are needed before recommending the use of accelerometers in comprehensive geriatric assessment.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><recordid>eNqVikFrwjAYQMPYYOr8Bx5y3aE1adquHoc41oMKVhB2KR_LZ4mLX6RJxJ8_Dzvocaf3eDzGJlKkUr3J6cHFnsCmJ0eYClmoolIPbCBnKkvKTKjHG39mQ-8PQhSqKssB-6rJhz4ekQJYDqT5ylFyFxdnsBGCccTdnufJEgP2fAf2x1DHmxOi5ob42uprrkmbs9ERrH9hT_srcPzHEXv9WGznn0kHFltD344CXkIH0fu2bjbte16oPK9kJtV_3l9YMU-2</recordid><startdate>20160414</startdate><enddate>20160414</enddate><creator>Maggio, Marcello</creator><creator>Ceda, Gian Paolo</creator><creator>Ticinesi, Andrea</creator><creator>De Vita, Francesca</creator><creator>Gelmini, Giovanni</creator><creator>Costantino, Cosimo</creator><creator>Meschi, Tiziana</creator><creator>Kressig, Reto W</creator><creator>Cesari, Matteo</creator><creator>Fabi, Massimo</creator><creator>Lauretani, Fulvio</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160414</creationdate><title>Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Evaluation of 4-Meter Walking Speed in Older Individuals</title><author>Maggio, Marcello ; Ceda, Gian Paolo ; Ticinesi, Andrea ; De Vita, Francesca ; Gelmini, Giovanni ; Costantino, Cosimo ; Meschi, Tiziana ; Kressig, Reto W ; Cesari, Matteo ; Fabi, Massimo ; Lauretani, Fulvio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A4534481213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggio, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ceda, Gian Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ticinesi, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vita, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelmini, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meschi, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kressig, Reto W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesari, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabi, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauretani, Fulvio</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggio, Marcello</au><au>Ceda, Gian Paolo</au><au>Ticinesi, Andrea</au><au>De Vita, Francesca</au><au>Gelmini, Giovanni</au><au>Costantino, Cosimo</au><au>Meschi, Tiziana</au><au>Kressig, Reto W</au><au>Cesari, Matteo</au><au>Fabi, Massimo</au><au>Lauretani, Fulvio</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Evaluation of 4-Meter Walking Speed in Older Individuals</atitle><jtitle>PLoS ONE</jtitle><date>2016-04-14</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Manual measurement of 4-meter gait speed by a stopwatch is the gold standard test for functional assessment in older adults. However, the accuracy of this technique may be biased by several factors, including intra- and inter-operator variability. Instrumental techniques of measurement using accelerometers may have a higher accuracy. Studies addressing the concordance between these two techniques are missing. The aim of the present community-based observational study was to compare manual and instrumental measurements of 4-meter gait speed in older individuals and to assess their relationship with other indicators of physical performance. One-hundred seventy-two (69 men, 103 women) non-disabled community-dwellers aged [greater than or equal to]65 years were enrolled. They underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment including physical function by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), hand grip strength, and 6-minute walking test (6MWT). Timed usual walking speed on a 4-meter course was assessed by using both a stopwatch (4-meter manual measurement, 4-MM) and a tri-axial accelerometer (4-meter automatic measurement, 4-MA). Correlations between these performance measures were evaluated separately in men and women by partial correlation coefficients. In both genders, 4-MA was associated with 4-MM (men r = 0.62, p&lt;0.001; women r = 0.73, p&lt;0.001), handgrip strength (men r = 0.40, p = 0.005; women r = 0.29, p = 0.001) and 6MWT (men r = 0.50, p = 0.0004; women r = 0.22, p = 0.048). 4-MM was associated with handgrip strength and 6MWT in both men and women. Considering gait speed &lt;0.6 m/s as diagnostic of dismobility syndrome, the two methods of assessment disagreed, with a different categorization of subjects, in 19% of men and 23% of women. The use of accelerometer resulted in 29 (13 M, 16 F) additional diagnoses of dismobility, compared with the 4-MM. In an older population, the concordance of gait speeds manually or instrumentally assessed is not optimal. The results suggest that manual measures might lead to misclassification of a substantial number of subjects. However, longitudinal studies using standardized and validated procedures aimed at the comparison of different techniques are needed before recommending the use of accelerometers in comprehensive geriatric assessment.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0153583</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PLoS ONE, 2016, Vol.11 (4)
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A453448121
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Elderly
Gait
Physiological aspects
Walking
title Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Evaluation of 4-Meter Walking Speed in Older Individuals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T21%3A26%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Instrumental%20and%20Non-Instrumental%20Evaluation%20of%204-Meter%20Walking%20Speed%20in%20Older%20Individuals&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20ONE&rft.au=Maggio,%20Marcello&rft.date=2016-04-14&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0153583&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA453448121%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A4534481213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A453448121&rfr_iscdi=true