Loading…
A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis
HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness among high-risk populations. In Thailand, PrEP has been included in the National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention since 2014. As a part of the national monitoring and evaluation framework for Thailand'...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268407 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e0268407 |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Rayanakorn, Ajaree Chautrakarn, Sineenart Intawong, Kannikar Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa Khemngern, Porntip Olson, Debra Chariyalertsak, Suwat |
description | HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness among high-risk populations. In Thailand, PrEP has been included in the National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention since 2014. As a part of the national monitoring and evaluation framework for Thailand's universal coverage inclusion, this cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess knowledge of, attitudes to and practice (KAP) of PrEP service providers in Thailand. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to explore knowledge of, and attitudes towards PrEP among providers from hospital and Key Population Led Health Services (KPLHS) settings. The questionnaire was distributed online in July 2020. Descriptive and univariate analysis using an independent-sample t-test were applied in the analyses. Attitudes were ranked from the most negative (score of 1) to the most positive (score of 5). Overall, there were 196 respondents (158 from hospitals and 38 from KPLHS) in which most hospital providers are female nurse practitioners while half of those from KPLHS report current gender as gay. Most respondents report a high level of PrEP knowledge and support provision in all high-risk groups with residual concern regarding anti-retroviral drugs resistance. Over two-fifths of providers from both settings perceive that PrEP would result in risk compensation and half of KPLHS providers are concerned regarding risk of sexual transmitted infections. Limited PrEP counselling time is a challenge for hospital providers. Service integration between both settings, more involvement and distribution of KPLHS in reaching key populations would be essential in optimizing PrEP uptake and retention. Continuing support particularly in raising awareness about PrEP among healthcare providers and key populations, facilities and manpower, unlimited quota of patient recruitment and PrEP training to strengthen providers' confidence and knowledge would be essential for successful PrEP implementation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0268407 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A703449126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A703449126</galeid><sourcerecordid>A703449126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g996-d7f9ab799d41acd7fc0422ff5301786ef99af94a435bf042e40ae5382fcb8ecd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjk1Lw0AYhBdRsFb_gYecBA-p-5VN9liKH4VCQYvX8iZ5N01dd0N2g_XfG9FDPXmaGeZhGEKuGZ0xkbO7vR96B3bWeYczylUhaX5CJkwLnipOxemRPycXIewpzUSh1IQs5knl3zvo2-Bd4k0CMbZxqDEk4OrkzfkPi3WD31XXY4qHzoehxzH4bvdp4dCGS3JmwAa8-tUp2TzcbxZP6Wr9uFzMV2mjtUrr3Ggoc61ryaAaU0Ul58ZkgrK8UGi0BqMlSJGVZqxQUsDxJTdVWWBViym5_ZltwOK2dZV3EQ-xgSGE7fLleTvPqZBSM67-Ydevf9mbI3aHYOMueDvE1rtwDH4BFDls0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Rayanakorn, Ajaree ; Chautrakarn, Sineenart ; Intawong, Kannikar ; Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa ; Khemngern, Porntip ; Olson, Debra ; Chariyalertsak, Suwat</creator><creatorcontrib>Rayanakorn, Ajaree ; Chautrakarn, Sineenart ; Intawong, Kannikar ; Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa ; Khemngern, Porntip ; Olson, Debra ; Chariyalertsak, Suwat</creatorcontrib><description>HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness among high-risk populations. In Thailand, PrEP has been included in the National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention since 2014. As a part of the national monitoring and evaluation framework for Thailand's universal coverage inclusion, this cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess knowledge of, attitudes to and practice (KAP) of PrEP service providers in Thailand. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to explore knowledge of, and attitudes towards PrEP among providers from hospital and Key Population Led Health Services (KPLHS) settings. The questionnaire was distributed online in July 2020. Descriptive and univariate analysis using an independent-sample t-test were applied in the analyses. Attitudes were ranked from the most negative (score of 1) to the most positive (score of 5). Overall, there were 196 respondents (158 from hospitals and 38 from KPLHS) in which most hospital providers are female nurse practitioners while half of those from KPLHS report current gender as gay. Most respondents report a high level of PrEP knowledge and support provision in all high-risk groups with residual concern regarding anti-retroviral drugs resistance. Over two-fifths of providers from both settings perceive that PrEP would result in risk compensation and half of KPLHS providers are concerned regarding risk of sexual transmitted infections. Limited PrEP counselling time is a challenge for hospital providers. Service integration between both settings, more involvement and distribution of KPLHS in reaching key populations would be essential in optimizing PrEP uptake and retention. Continuing support particularly in raising awareness about PrEP among healthcare providers and key populations, facilities and manpower, unlimited quota of patient recruitment and PrEP training to strengthen providers' confidence and knowledge would be essential for successful PrEP implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268407</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268407</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rayanakorn, Ajaree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chautrakarn, Sineenart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intawong, Kannikar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khemngern, Porntip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chariyalertsak, Suwat</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis</title><title>PloS one</title><description>HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness among high-risk populations. In Thailand, PrEP has been included in the National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention since 2014. As a part of the national monitoring and evaluation framework for Thailand's universal coverage inclusion, this cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess knowledge of, attitudes to and practice (KAP) of PrEP service providers in Thailand. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to explore knowledge of, and attitudes towards PrEP among providers from hospital and Key Population Led Health Services (KPLHS) settings. The questionnaire was distributed online in July 2020. Descriptive and univariate analysis using an independent-sample t-test were applied in the analyses. Attitudes were ranked from the most negative (score of 1) to the most positive (score of 5). Overall, there were 196 respondents (158 from hospitals and 38 from KPLHS) in which most hospital providers are female nurse practitioners while half of those from KPLHS report current gender as gay. Most respondents report a high level of PrEP knowledge and support provision in all high-risk groups with residual concern regarding anti-retroviral drugs resistance. Over two-fifths of providers from both settings perceive that PrEP would result in risk compensation and half of KPLHS providers are concerned regarding risk of sexual transmitted infections. Limited PrEP counselling time is a challenge for hospital providers. Service integration between both settings, more involvement and distribution of KPLHS in reaching key populations would be essential in optimizing PrEP uptake and retention. Continuing support particularly in raising awareness about PrEP among healthcare providers and key populations, facilities and manpower, unlimited quota of patient recruitment and PrEP training to strengthen providers' confidence and knowledge would be essential for successful PrEP implementation.</description><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjk1Lw0AYhBdRsFb_gYecBA-p-5VN9liKH4VCQYvX8iZ5N01dd0N2g_XfG9FDPXmaGeZhGEKuGZ0xkbO7vR96B3bWeYczylUhaX5CJkwLnipOxemRPycXIewpzUSh1IQs5knl3zvo2-Bd4k0CMbZxqDEk4OrkzfkPi3WD31XXY4qHzoehxzH4bvdp4dCGS3JmwAa8-tUp2TzcbxZP6Wr9uFzMV2mjtUrr3Ggoc61ryaAaU0Ul58ZkgrK8UGi0BqMlSJGVZqxQUsDxJTdVWWBViym5_ZltwOK2dZV3EQ-xgSGE7fLleTvPqZBSM67-Ydevf9mbI3aHYOMueDvE1rtwDH4BFDls0Q</recordid><startdate>20220512</startdate><enddate>20220512</enddate><creator>Rayanakorn, Ajaree</creator><creator>Chautrakarn, Sineenart</creator><creator>Intawong, Kannikar</creator><creator>Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa</creator><creator>Khemngern, Porntip</creator><creator>Olson, Debra</creator><creator>Chariyalertsak, Suwat</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220512</creationdate><title>A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis</title><author>Rayanakorn, Ajaree ; Chautrakarn, Sineenart ; Intawong, Kannikar ; Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa ; Khemngern, Porntip ; Olson, Debra ; Chariyalertsak, Suwat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g996-d7f9ab799d41acd7fc0422ff5301786ef99af94a435bf042e40ae5382fcb8ecd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rayanakorn, Ajaree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chautrakarn, Sineenart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intawong, Kannikar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khemngern, Porntip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chariyalertsak, Suwat</creatorcontrib><collection>Opposing Viewpoints in Context (Gale)</collection><collection>Science In Context</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rayanakorn, Ajaree</au><au>Chautrakarn, Sineenart</au><au>Intawong, Kannikar</au><au>Chariyalertsak, Chonlisa</au><au>Khemngern, Porntip</au><au>Olson, Debra</au><au>Chariyalertsak, Suwat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-05-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e0268407</spage><pages>e0268407-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has demonstrated efficacy and effectiveness among high-risk populations. In Thailand, PrEP has been included in the National Guidelines on HIV/AIDS Treatment and Prevention since 2014. As a part of the national monitoring and evaluation framework for Thailand's universal coverage inclusion, this cross-sectional survey was conducted to assess knowledge of, attitudes to and practice (KAP) of PrEP service providers in Thailand. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to explore knowledge of, and attitudes towards PrEP among providers from hospital and Key Population Led Health Services (KPLHS) settings. The questionnaire was distributed online in July 2020. Descriptive and univariate analysis using an independent-sample t-test were applied in the analyses. Attitudes were ranked from the most negative (score of 1) to the most positive (score of 5). Overall, there were 196 respondents (158 from hospitals and 38 from KPLHS) in which most hospital providers are female nurse practitioners while half of those from KPLHS report current gender as gay. Most respondents report a high level of PrEP knowledge and support provision in all high-risk groups with residual concern regarding anti-retroviral drugs resistance. Over two-fifths of providers from both settings perceive that PrEP would result in risk compensation and half of KPLHS providers are concerned regarding risk of sexual transmitted infections. Limited PrEP counselling time is a challenge for hospital providers. Service integration between both settings, more involvement and distribution of KPLHS in reaching key populations would be essential in optimizing PrEP uptake and retention. Continuing support particularly in raising awareness about PrEP among healthcare providers and key populations, facilities and manpower, unlimited quota of patient recruitment and PrEP training to strengthen providers' confidence and knowledge would be essential for successful PrEP implementation.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0268407</doi><tpages>e0268407</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2022-05, Vol.17 (5), p.e0268407 |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A703449126 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
title | A comparison of attitudes and knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A15%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20attitudes%20and%20knowledge%20of%20pre-exposure%20prophylaxis&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Rayanakorn,%20Ajaree&rft.date=2022-05-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0268407&rft.pages=e0268407-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0268407&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA703449126%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g996-d7f9ab799d41acd7fc0422ff5301786ef99af94a435bf042e40ae5382fcb8ecd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A703449126&rfr_iscdi=true |