Loading…

Broad Whitefish

Understanding the ecological niche of some fishes is complicated by their frequent use of a broad range of food resources and habitats across space and time. Little is known about Broad Whitefish (Coregonus nasus) ecological niches in Arctic landscapes even though they are an important subsistence s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0270474
Main Authors: Leppi, Jason C, Rinella, Daniel J, Wipfli, Mark S, Whitman, Matthew S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page e0270474
container_title PloS one
container_volume 17
creator Leppi, Jason C
Rinella, Daniel J
Wipfli, Mark S
Whitman, Matthew S
description Understanding the ecological niche of some fishes is complicated by their frequent use of a broad range of food resources and habitats across space and time. Little is known about Broad Whitefish (Coregonus nasus) ecological niches in Arctic landscapes even though they are an important subsistence species for Alaska's Indigenous communities. We investigated the foraging ecology and habitat use of Broad Whitefish via stable isotope analyses of muscle and liver tissue and otoliths from mature fish migrating in the Colville River within Arctic Alaska. The range of [delta].sup.13 C (-31.8- -21.9%) and [delta].sup.15 N (6.6-13.1%) across tissue types and among individuals overlapped with isotope values previously observed in Arctic lakes and rivers, estuaries, and nearshore marine habitat. The large range of [delta].sup.18 O (4.5-10.9%) and [delta]D (-237.6- -158.9%) suggests fish utilized a broad spectrum of habitats across elevational and latitudinal gradients. Cluster analysis of muscle [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta].sup.15 N, [delta].sup.18 O, and [delta]D indicated that Broad Whitefish occupied four different foraging niches that relied on marine and land-based (i.e., freshwater and terrestrial) food sources to varying degrees. Most individuals had isotopic signatures representative of coastal freshwater habitat (Group 3; 25%) or coastal lagoon and delta habitat (Group 1; 57%), while individuals that mainly utilized inland freshwater (Group 4; 4%) and nearshore marine habitats (Group 2; 14%) represented smaller proportions. Otolith microchemistry confirmed that individuals with more enriched muscle tissue [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta]D, and [delta].sup.18 O tended to use marine habitats, while individuals that mainly used freshwater habitats had values that were less enriched. The isotopic niches identified here represent important foraging habitats utilized by Broad Whitefish. To preserve access to these diverse habitats it will be important to limit barriers along nearshore areas and reduce impacts like roads and climate change on natural flow regimes. Maintaining these diverse connected habitats will facilitate long-term population stability, buffering populations from future environmental and anthropogenic perturbations.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0270474
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A711554497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711554497</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711554497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g997-5ae6e92e8bdbdad141daeb559f437c869d635ea4b96919e038846f4774c83543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFzM1KAzEUhuEgCtYq3oALV4KLmSaTk79lLdUWCgUruhwykzM_JSTSzICX70IX48rV9y4ePkLuGM0ZV2xxjOMpWJ9_xoA5LRQFBWdkxgwvMllQfj7pS3KV0pFSwbWUM3L7dIrW3X90_YBNn7prctFYn_Dmd-fk8Lx-W22y3f5lu1rustYYlQmLEk2BunKVs44BcxYrIUwDXNVaGie5QAuVkYYZpFxrkA0oBbXmAvicPP68ttZj2Yc6hgG_htaOKZXbw2u5VIwJAWDUP3b__tc-TGyH1g9din4c-hjSFH4D-EJXsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Broad Whitefish</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Leppi, Jason C ; Rinella, Daniel J ; Wipfli, Mark S ; Whitman, Matthew S</creator><creatorcontrib>Leppi, Jason C ; Rinella, Daniel J ; Wipfli, Mark S ; Whitman, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the ecological niche of some fishes is complicated by their frequent use of a broad range of food resources and habitats across space and time. Little is known about Broad Whitefish (Coregonus nasus) ecological niches in Arctic landscapes even though they are an important subsistence species for Alaska's Indigenous communities. We investigated the foraging ecology and habitat use of Broad Whitefish via stable isotope analyses of muscle and liver tissue and otoliths from mature fish migrating in the Colville River within Arctic Alaska. The range of [delta].sup.13 C (-31.8- -21.9%) and [delta].sup.15 N (6.6-13.1%) across tissue types and among individuals overlapped with isotope values previously observed in Arctic lakes and rivers, estuaries, and nearshore marine habitat. The large range of [delta].sup.18 O (4.5-10.9%) and [delta]D (-237.6- -158.9%) suggests fish utilized a broad spectrum of habitats across elevational and latitudinal gradients. Cluster analysis of muscle [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta].sup.15 N, [delta].sup.18 O, and [delta]D indicated that Broad Whitefish occupied four different foraging niches that relied on marine and land-based (i.e., freshwater and terrestrial) food sources to varying degrees. Most individuals had isotopic signatures representative of coastal freshwater habitat (Group 3; 25%) or coastal lagoon and delta habitat (Group 1; 57%), while individuals that mainly utilized inland freshwater (Group 4; 4%) and nearshore marine habitats (Group 2; 14%) represented smaller proportions. Otolith microchemistry confirmed that individuals with more enriched muscle tissue [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta]D, and [delta].sup.18 O tended to use marine habitats, while individuals that mainly used freshwater habitats had values that were less enriched. The isotopic niches identified here represent important foraging habitats utilized by Broad Whitefish. To preserve access to these diverse habitats it will be important to limit barriers along nearshore areas and reduce impacts like roads and climate change on natural flow regimes. Maintaining these diverse connected habitats will facilitate long-term population stability, buffering populations from future environmental and anthropogenic perturbations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Climatic changes ; Environmental aspects ; Influence ; Niche (Ecology) ; Properties ; Whitefishes</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0270474</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leppi, Jason C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinella, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wipfli, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitman, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><title>Broad Whitefish</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Understanding the ecological niche of some fishes is complicated by their frequent use of a broad range of food resources and habitats across space and time. Little is known about Broad Whitefish (Coregonus nasus) ecological niches in Arctic landscapes even though they are an important subsistence species for Alaska's Indigenous communities. We investigated the foraging ecology and habitat use of Broad Whitefish via stable isotope analyses of muscle and liver tissue and otoliths from mature fish migrating in the Colville River within Arctic Alaska. The range of [delta].sup.13 C (-31.8- -21.9%) and [delta].sup.15 N (6.6-13.1%) across tissue types and among individuals overlapped with isotope values previously observed in Arctic lakes and rivers, estuaries, and nearshore marine habitat. The large range of [delta].sup.18 O (4.5-10.9%) and [delta]D (-237.6- -158.9%) suggests fish utilized a broad spectrum of habitats across elevational and latitudinal gradients. Cluster analysis of muscle [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta].sup.15 N, [delta].sup.18 O, and [delta]D indicated that Broad Whitefish occupied four different foraging niches that relied on marine and land-based (i.e., freshwater and terrestrial) food sources to varying degrees. Most individuals had isotopic signatures representative of coastal freshwater habitat (Group 3; 25%) or coastal lagoon and delta habitat (Group 1; 57%), while individuals that mainly utilized inland freshwater (Group 4; 4%) and nearshore marine habitats (Group 2; 14%) represented smaller proportions. Otolith microchemistry confirmed that individuals with more enriched muscle tissue [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta]D, and [delta].sup.18 O tended to use marine habitats, while individuals that mainly used freshwater habitats had values that were less enriched. The isotopic niches identified here represent important foraging habitats utilized by Broad Whitefish. To preserve access to these diverse habitats it will be important to limit barriers along nearshore areas and reduce impacts like roads and climate change on natural flow regimes. Maintaining these diverse connected habitats will facilitate long-term population stability, buffering populations from future environmental and anthropogenic perturbations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Niche (Ecology)</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Whitefishes</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFzM1KAzEUhuEgCtYq3oALV4KLmSaTk79lLdUWCgUruhwykzM_JSTSzICX70IX48rV9y4ePkLuGM0ZV2xxjOMpWJ9_xoA5LRQFBWdkxgwvMllQfj7pS3KV0pFSwbWUM3L7dIrW3X90_YBNn7prctFYn_Dmd-fk8Lx-W22y3f5lu1rustYYlQmLEk2BunKVs44BcxYrIUwDXNVaGie5QAuVkYYZpFxrkA0oBbXmAvicPP68ttZj2Yc6hgG_htaOKZXbw2u5VIwJAWDUP3b__tc-TGyH1g9din4c-hjSFH4D-EJXsg</recordid><startdate>20220726</startdate><enddate>20220726</enddate><creator>Leppi, Jason C</creator><creator>Rinella, Daniel J</creator><creator>Wipfli, Mark S</creator><creator>Whitman, Matthew S</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220726</creationdate><title>Broad Whitefish</title><author>Leppi, Jason C ; Rinella, Daniel J ; Wipfli, Mark S ; Whitman, Matthew S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g997-5ae6e92e8bdbdad141daeb559f437c869d635ea4b96919e038846f4774c83543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Niche (Ecology)</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Whitefishes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leppi, Jason C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinella, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wipfli, Mark S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitman, Matthew S</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leppi, Jason C</au><au>Rinella, Daniel J</au><au>Wipfli, Mark S</au><au>Whitman, Matthew S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Broad Whitefish</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2022-07-26</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e0270474</spage><pages>e0270474-</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Understanding the ecological niche of some fishes is complicated by their frequent use of a broad range of food resources and habitats across space and time. Little is known about Broad Whitefish (Coregonus nasus) ecological niches in Arctic landscapes even though they are an important subsistence species for Alaska's Indigenous communities. We investigated the foraging ecology and habitat use of Broad Whitefish via stable isotope analyses of muscle and liver tissue and otoliths from mature fish migrating in the Colville River within Arctic Alaska. The range of [delta].sup.13 C (-31.8- -21.9%) and [delta].sup.15 N (6.6-13.1%) across tissue types and among individuals overlapped with isotope values previously observed in Arctic lakes and rivers, estuaries, and nearshore marine habitat. The large range of [delta].sup.18 O (4.5-10.9%) and [delta]D (-237.6- -158.9%) suggests fish utilized a broad spectrum of habitats across elevational and latitudinal gradients. Cluster analysis of muscle [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta].sup.15 N, [delta].sup.18 O, and [delta]D indicated that Broad Whitefish occupied four different foraging niches that relied on marine and land-based (i.e., freshwater and terrestrial) food sources to varying degrees. Most individuals had isotopic signatures representative of coastal freshwater habitat (Group 3; 25%) or coastal lagoon and delta habitat (Group 1; 57%), while individuals that mainly utilized inland freshwater (Group 4; 4%) and nearshore marine habitats (Group 2; 14%) represented smaller proportions. Otolith microchemistry confirmed that individuals with more enriched muscle tissue [delta].sup.13 CË, [delta]D, and [delta].sup.18 O tended to use marine habitats, while individuals that mainly used freshwater habitats had values that were less enriched. The isotopic niches identified here represent important foraging habitats utilized by Broad Whitefish. To preserve access to these diverse habitats it will be important to limit barriers along nearshore areas and reduce impacts like roads and climate change on natural flow regimes. Maintaining these diverse connected habitats will facilitate long-term population stability, buffering populations from future environmental and anthropogenic perturbations.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0270474</doi><tpages>e0270474</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2022-07, Vol.17 (7), p.e0270474
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A711554497
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Climatic changes
Environmental aspects
Influence
Niche (Ecology)
Properties
Whitefishes
title Broad Whitefish
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A11%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Broad%20Whitefish&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Leppi,%20Jason%20C&rft.date=2022-07-26&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e0270474&rft.pages=e0270474-&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0270474&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA711554497%3C/gale%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g997-5ae6e92e8bdbdad141daeb559f437c869d635ea4b96919e038846f4774c83543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A711554497&rfr_iscdi=true