Wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging

• Published in: PloS one 2023-05, Vol.18 (5), p.e0285089
• Main Authors: Oh, Hyunji, Yim, Younghee, Chung, Mi Sun, Byun, Jun Soo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Brain; Comparative analysis; Gadobutrol; Injuries; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetization; Medical imaging equipment; Methods
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285089

We aimed to validate the diagnostic performance of accelerated post-contrast magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) using wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (Wave-CAIPI) for enhancing intracranial lesions, compared with conventional MPRAGE. A total of 233 consecutive patients who underwent post-contrast Wave-CAIPI and conventional MPRAGE (scan time: 2 min 39 s vs. 4 min 30 s) were retrospectively evaluated. Two radiologists independently assessed whole images for the presence and diagnosis of enhancing lesions. The diagnostic performance for non-enhancing lesions, quantitative parameters (diameter of enhancing lesions, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR], and contrast rate), qualitative parameters (grey-white matter differentiation and conspicuity of enhancing lesions), and image qualities (overall image quality and motion artifacts) were also surveyed. The weighted kappa and percent agreement were used to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between the two sequences. Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE achieved significantly high agreement for the detection (98.7%[460/466], [kappa] = 0.965) and diagnosis (97.8%[455/466], [kappa] = 0.955) of enhancing intracranial lesions with conventional MPRAGE in pooled analysis. Detection and diagnosis of non-enhancing lesions (97.6% and 96.9% agreement), and diameter of enhancing lesions (P>0.05) also demonstrated high agreements between two sequences. Although Wave-CAIPI MPRAGE show lower SNR (P